By Kyle Smith
Friday, June 24, 2022
Republicans have won only eight of the last 14
presidential elections (and two of those presidents did not win the popular
vote), so the presidency has seemed like more or less a toss-up since the
debacle of the Lyndon Johnson presidency. However, luck simply fell in favor of
the Republicans; from the election of Richard Nixon through to the start of the
Bill Clinton era, Republicans have seated ten consecutive justices. (There were
four by Nixon, one by Ford, three by Reagan, and two by George H. W. Bush.
Jimmy Carter is the only president in my lifetime who was not able to fill a
Supreme Court vacancy. Donald Trump served only one term, yet got three seats.)
The point is, as a matter of Supreme Court
dynamics, Roe never should have lasted as long as it did. Even
if you date the rise of the pro-life movement to the election of Ronald Reagan
as president (just a few years after he had signed a very permissive abortion
law as governor of California), Republican presidents (all of whom campaigned
as pro-life stalwarts) have chosen ten of the last 14 justices (not counting
Ketanji Brown Jackson, who has yet to be seated) and five of the last seven.
There should have been a majority to overturn Roe many years
ago.
The only reason Roe lasted this long was
that Republican presidents seated many justices who turned out to be either
reliably liberal or at least liberal on the things that are most important to
liberals. (The last Democrat-picked justice who could be described as
conservative was Byron White, whom John F. Kennedy nominated.) For this reason,
Democrats started to think, not without good reason, that the Supreme Court was
functionally a moderately liberal super-legislature that would almost always
cut through the failure of Democrats to persuade voters to make the changes
they wanted at the times they wanted them and come through with the proper
liberal decision (albeit not in Bush v. Gore).
But that isn’t the way the Supreme Court is supposed to
work. Far from being institutionally liberal, it’s supposed to be
institutionally conservative, i.e., it’s supposed to apply the
Constitution. We appear to be at the start of a bold new era in which the Left
of this country will have to recognize the Constitution and work from there.
No comments:
Post a Comment