By Michael Brendan Dougherty
Wednesday, June 22, 2022
Does it feel like a moderate Democrat named Joe
Biden is in charge at the White House?
I don’t think so, either.
Not when the White House is whining about not being able
to spend $6 trillion to transform American society and the federal
government. And not when the White House is issuing executive orders attacking
perhaps a majority of therapists as little better than snake-handling
fundamentalists because they don’t immediately schedule a gelding the first
minute an insecure boy says he’s unsure of his manhood.
In HBO’s comedy Veep, the White House chief
of staff explains to the characters, “We all know the White House would work so
much better if there wasn’t a president, but there is, so we work around that.”
This was a joke in 2013, but in 2022, it’s beginning to feel like the order of
things.
In this case, Donald Trump was a pioneer. Trump’s envoy
to Syria, James Jeffrey, once gave a valedictory interview to DefenseOne, bragging about how he deceived the public and the
president himself on the number of American troops in Syria, thereby helping to
keep them there. “We were always playing shell games to not make clear to our
leadership how many troops we had there,” he said. Jeffrey went on to explain,
“My job is to make a quagmire for the Russians.”
Had the president told him that was his job? Had
Congress? Of course not. He was following the dictates of a foreign-policy
consensus. This is created by a set of people who were previously courtiers of
presidents, a group of people that effectively detached itself from the control
of Congress decades ago. But now this set has recently begun to detach itself
from the presidency, even as it operates throughout the executive branch.
Donald Trump had this problem constantly. His team of
advisers had steered him away from his desired troop withdrawal from Syria.
Then, speaking on the phone to Recep Erdogan, he asked Turkey’s dictator if
Turkey could handle things in the region. When Erdogan said yes, Trump
reportedly shouted down the line to John Bolton, “Start work for the withdrawal
of U.S. troops from Syria.” Shortly thereafter, Trump announced the withdrawal
on Twitter. A few weeks later, the “White House” announced that 200 troops would
stay; only 90 percent would leave. A few days later the Wall Street
Journal reported only half would leave. Maybe there was actually an
increase. Apparently, it’s not the president’s choice, or any of our business,
either.
Historically, most cabinet members and staffers have
relayed that even when they disagreed with their president, they always sought
to faithfully carry out his will. But under Biden, even the top people in the
job seem to not know the mind of their own president, or to simply disregard
it.
In April, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told an audience
that the U.S. wanted Ukraine to win its war, and for the result to be a “weakened Russia.” At the same time, other Biden officials were filling
up the cocktail-party scene with visions of regime change in Russia, according to historian Niall Ferguson. Secretary of State Antony Blinken publicly agreed with
Austin’s comments.
President Joe Biden had to scold them privately.
According to a report in the Hill, Biden was worried that their rhetoric “could set
unrealistic goals and up the chance Washington could get pulled into a direct
conflict with Moscow.”
Maybe they were caught up in the same atmosphere that
informed James Jeffrey that his job was to weaken Russia.
Now of course, it is the job of advisers to float and
advocate for courses of action that may be wise, even if unpopular. But it’s
not hard to spell out precisely why it is so dangerous for the executive branch
to brazenly detach its own head, and continue to operate. The political
responsibility falls to the president himself. He is the one that people elect.
The presidency has evolved into a cumbersome office, and
the executive branch is a gargantuan monstrosity in our republic. When the
presidents are disorganized, lack focus, become overwhelmed, or are too
enfeebled, we end up with the worst of all worlds. We end up with the courtiers
to the president effectively seizing power from him without having any of the
final responsibility. Biden’s right; you could end up in a direct conflict with
Russia this way.
No comments:
Post a Comment