By Jim Geraghty
Friday, June 24, 2022
Considering how overturning Roe v. Wade looked
impossible, or extraordinarily unlikely, when Justice Antonin Scalia died
on February 13, 2016, to many pro-lifers, today seems nothing short of
miraculous.
Democrats who support abortion rights will point a lot of
fingers in the weeks to come. They will blame Senate minority leader Mitch
McConnell for refusing to hold confirmation hearings when Obama nominated
Merrick Garland for the Supreme Court. They probably ought to assign some blame
to Harry Reid for eliminating the filibuster for certain judicial nominees,
which led to Republicans eliminating the filibuster for Supreme Court nominees.
While his vote wasn’t decisive in either case, they will probably set aside
some ire for Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia for voting to confirm Neil
Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. They may well fume about the eleven Senate Democrats who voted to confirm Justice Clarence
Thomas back in 1991.
But there’s one other figure whose decisions
inadvertently but inevitably led to today’s decision: the late justice Ruth
Bader Ginsburg. Back in 2013, President Barack Obama met with Ginsburg,
with hopes that the then-80-year-old, two-time cancer patient could
be persuaded to retire:
Mr. Obama had asked his White House
counsel, Kathryn Ruemmler, to set up the lunch so he could build a closer
rapport with the justice, according to two people briefed on the
conversation. Treading cautiously, he did not directly bring up the subject of
retirement to Justice Ginsburg, at 80 the Supreme Court’s oldest member and a
two-time cancer patient.
He did, however, raise the looming 2014
midterm elections and how Democrats might lose control of the Senate. Implicit
in that conversation was the concern motivating his lunch invitation — the
possibility that if the Senate flipped, he would lose a chance to appoint a
younger, liberal judge who could hold on to the seat for decades.
Senator Patrick Leahy reportedly had a similar
conversation with Ginsburg, hoping to nudge her to retire, to ensure she would
be replaced by a like-minded justice. At the time, Democrats effectively had 55
seats — 53 Democrats and Vermont’s Bernie Sanders and Maine’s Angus King. It
was extremely likely that Obama could have gotten Garland or another
philosophically aligned nominee confirmed by the Democratic-controlled Senate
in 2013 or 2014.
But Ginsburg just wasn’t interested in retiring. After
Ginsburg died in 2020, and President Trump and the GOP-controlled Senate
replaced her with Amy Coney Barrett, many liberals realized Ginsburg had made a catastrophic mistake.
By remaining on the court for another six or seven years, Ginsburg had denied
Democrats their last, best chance to keep a majority on the Court that viewed
the law the way she did.
Today’s decision was 6–3, but in his concurrence, Chief
Justice John Roberts seemed significantly less enthusiastic about
overturning Roe. It is more than fair to wonder if Roberts would
have concurred with Thomas, Alito, and the rest if he was the deciding vote,
and the other justices split four to four. In that scenario, it is likely
Roberts would have attempted to find some narrowly tailored middle path.
In other words, Roe v. Wade probably
wouldn’t have been overturned if Obama’s lunch with Ginsburg had convinced her
to retire.
No comments:
Post a Comment