By Kyle Smith
Wednesday, June 10, 2020
After the actual riots, the metaphorical ones.
Reputations get burned down. Careers get their windows smashed in. Character
gets assassinated.
Much of this has been nearly as senseless,
emotion-driven, and inane as the actual burning, looting, and destroying of
urban neighborhoods. Attacking Drew Brees for expressing widely held patriotic
beliefs was about as rational as setting fire to a gas station. Brees should
have realized this, taken a deep breath, and reacted in the following way: by
doing nothing. Brees should have let his original statement stand. “I will
never agree with anybody disrespecting the flag of the United States of
America,” was what he said, adding that thinking about the flag and the
national anthem “brings me to tears thinking about all that’s been sacrificed.
Not just those in the military, but for that matter, those throughout the civil
rights movements of the ’60s and all that has been endured by so many people up
until this point.” Brees said paying respect to the flag “shows unity. It shows
that we are all in this together, we can all do better, and that we are all
part of the solution.”
Stirring words, and nothing inflammatory about them. Tony
Dungy chimed in, “Drew Brees can’t be afraid to say that and we can’t be afraid
to say ‘Okay, I don’t agree with you but let’s talk about this.’ We can’t just
say anytime something happens we don’t agree with, ‘Hey I’m done with that and
this person.’ That doesn’t make sense.”
Brees made his situation worse by apologizing for these
remarks, which only turned up the outrage. The quarterback’s ritual groveling
simply made his detractors more powerful. They demanded further groveling, and
he complied. Now he has stamped himself forever as an antagonist to both sides
of the culture war. The radical Left will never forgive him for his original
statement for daring to question woke wisdom, while the majority who love this
country and its symbols can never unsee his pathetic, craven cringing in the
face of the mob.
Do not pour oil on troubled waters if, thanks to an oil
spill, those waters are already on fire. Other public figures should take note:
Begging the mob’s forgiveness doesn’t work. Brees could have simply remained
silent after his original tribute to Old Glory, and tempers would have cooled.
More and more people would have come to his defense. Those who were initially angry
would have come to realize that Brees said nothing offensive.
When you apologize for stating the plain truth, you
almost never succeed in appeasing the mob. Instead, you grant the mob’s
premises. You take its side. You tell the roiling masses that it’s time to open
fire on you, as you volunteer for your own firing squad. Brees is as unused to
being a target of foam-flecked attacks as I am to throwing 50-yard touchdown
passes in the Superdome, but as someone who has been targeted by social-media
dudgeon many times and has never begged forgiveness in the 15 years my
published thoughts have been making people furious, I could have told him:
These things blow over in 48 hours. Nobody in the land of short attention spans
can stay enraged about the same thing for very long. Fires burn out if you
don’t keep refueling them.
All over the culture, that lesson is going unheeded.
Americans who rush to prostrate themselves before the mob are finding that the
mob never replies, “Oh, that’s fine, then. Go on about your life with our
blessing.” Claudia Eller was the editor of Variety last week. Now she
isn’t, because she decided to make gestures of woke obeisance in a lengthy,
self-flagellating column about George Floyd, systemic racism, Donald Trump’s
behavior, and police brutality, none of them obviously topics of much concern
to a showbiz site. The column was full of long quotations from staffers of
color and oozed with both compassion for their plight and vows to add more of
them — “As editor-in-chief of Variety I have tried to diversify our newsroom
over the past 7 years, but I HAVE NOT DONE ENOUGH,” she wrote. Naturally, some
writers smelled blood and began berating her on social media for her
insensitivity. Eller replied to one of them on Twitter, not unreasonably, “When
someone cops to something why would you try to criticize them? You sound really
bitter.” Eller was jobless the next day, issuing more apologies, decrying her
own leadership, and saying she was ashamed on her way out the door. Variety
says Eller is now on a two-month leave, but as the indispensable Hollywood
columnist Richard Rushfield notes in his The Ankler newsletter, “I’m not
sure how you walk back from an admission that you’re unprepared for a
leadership role in a newsroom. You don’t just take two months off and then show
up on the doorstep and say, I watched a MasterClass in leadership and now I’m
ready.”
On the East Coast, nearly the same thing happened at
nearly the same time: Bon Appétit editor Adam Rapoport hurled himself at
the feet of the mob, begged its forgiveness, vowed to do better, and found
himself joining the unemployment rolls. In a column entitled “Food Has Always
Been Political: Bon Appétit’s editor in chief Adam Rapoport on how we’re
covering the nationwide uprisings,” Rapaport repeated talking points from the
woke catechism, inspiring a food writer with 8,000 Twitter followers to berate
him for not doing enough. At some point in the pile-on, someone remembered that
Rapaport had posed as a Puerto Rican at a Halloween party 16 years ago (the
picture had been on Instagram), and his contract was terminated. Follow-up
hysteria-reporting revealed that there had been a “culture of microaggression”
at Bon Appétit. So, it’s a Condé Nast magazine, then.
Though few have the backbone to tell a howling mob to get stuffed, or even calmly to explain why it’s in the wrong, simply mustering the fortitude to ignore its cries is a perfectly workable option. Don’t want your food magazine to get fragged in the culture wars? Maybe don’t write a piece proclaiming, “Food has always been political.” Don’t think you’ve done anything wrong? Then don’t say, “I must do better.” Over in the U.K., a key adviser to Prime Minister Boris Johnson, Dominic Cummings, touched off a press freakout that was startling even by the ten-Red-Bulls-before-breakfast standards of the British media by supposedly breaking his own government’s social-distancing policies when he and his wife were battling coronavirus. Cummings levelly explained that he had broken no law, defended his actions, and declined to fit his neck into the guillotine. Johnson stood by him and the story was over. Courage, we seem to have forgotten, is not only virtuous, it can be useful.
No comments:
Post a Comment