By David Marcus
Tuesday, January 23, 2018
“Do you support Trump?” It is one of the most loaded and
divisive questions that can be asked in America today. But what does it mean?
What does a yes or no tell us about the people being asked? Does it tell us
anything about their views, policy preferences, hopes for the country? With
Trump’s reelection campaign two years away, is it essentially a moot question?
Is it akin to asking if you support the Astros as World Series champions when,
after all, until next October, what difference does it make?
Typically, in cases of presidents so far from a
reelection bid, we think in terms of approval, not support. There is a subtle
but vital difference between the two concepts. What we approve or disapprove of
is job performance, not the person. What we support, on the other hand, is the
person, not the policies or accomplishments.
One can readily imagine people who approve of the job
that the president has done and appreciate his accomplishments yet still do not
consider themselves to be one of his supporters. This is partly a symptom of
just how unconventional a figure he is for the position he holds. For many, the
coarsening of our discourse and standards, from insulting tweets to alleged
dalliances with porn stars, outweigh what they may see as serious positives
from his first year in office.
How About Looking
At It From the Opposite Angle
Perhaps, in order to understand what it means to support
President Trump, it is useful to consider what it means to oppose him. His
fiercest critics, who make up a good portion of the country, have dubbed
themselves “the resistance” instead of the more typical term, the “opposition.”
Again, the subtle differences between these two terms are telling.
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, opposition
means “Resistance or dissent, expressed in action or argument.” Resistance
means, “The refusal to accept or comply with something.” Resistance is
absolutely the correct term to define how much of the Left has reacted to the
Trump presidency. “Not my president” is a sentiment that refuses to accept the
outcome of the free and fair election. Thus one challenge for Democrats in
office, who might otherwise be open to working with Trump, is that for this
resistance, any deal with Trump is complicity.
Not without some justification, Democrats will point to
Republican obstruction of President Obama’s agenda (and Supreme Court pick) and
say the GOP is reaping what it sowed. But something different is happening with
Trump and what it means to support him.
During Obama’s presidency, “Obama supporter” was roughly
synonymous with “Democrat.” There were a few radicals, like Cornel West, who
called out Obama’s neoliberalism, and Occupy Wall Street expressed some degree
of criticism, but no major faction of Democrats or liberal media were in an
anti-Obama camp.
This is not true for Trump. The Never Trump movement
still has important adherents and many nominal conservatives or Republicans
still openly oppose him. This means the term “Trump supporter” is not
synonymous with “Republican.” Instead, it describes a specific segment of the
population that the media has been spending two years trying to figure out.
J.D. Vance and Salena Zito write about them, and Frank Luntz does focus groups
with them. To the Left, they are at best rubes voting against their own
interests and at worst racists. To the establishment Right, they are an enigma
to be somehow wooed back.
The Difficulties
Of Voxplaining Trump Supporters
The “Trump Supporter” has been dealt with, not with
journalism, but with anthropology. Who are these strange people living in
backwater, anti-dancing Footloose towns that can’t see through Trump’s
chicanery? One day last week, The New
York Times forewent an editorial page to give voice to letters from Trump
supporters. It was a strange gesture, but it made clear how bizarre the
mainstream media finds those who support Trump.
The “Trump Supporter” needs a special section, a Vox
explainer. They need a spread in National
Geographic next to the one on the indigenous people of some nowhere place
who haven’t ever touched Western society. Who
are these people? the right sort asks, while more and more Americans ask, Is it me?
The upshot is that identifying as a Trump supporter means
one is joining a tribe that Hillary Clinton described as deplorable. We have
had these kinds of political designations in our political history, but not
recently. The last real analog was probably the “Reagan Democrat.”
Interestingly, these were to some extent the 1980s version of the Trump
supporter: White, working-class, and traditionally Democratic-leaning ethnic
whites. It was a demographic very similar to the one Trump flipped to win the
presidency.
We are far removed from a world in which, once they win,
all Americans hope for the success of the president. Frankly, this may never
have existed. It may have been simply a form of polite discourse. It might also
have been a form of polite discourse that makes a country run better. But for
better or worse it appears to be abandoned in the scoreboard-driven politics of
our time.
Do you support Trump? What a question. What a measure of
one’s desire for ends and tolerance of means, what a statement of self. The
gravity of this question, and the extent to which good hosts will try to avoid
it, tells us something about our political moment. As more mainstream
conservatives remove the fingers from their noses and support Trump without the
prerequisite reservations, the definition of Trump supporter may be shifting.
Maybe this will mark a change in Trump himself. Perhaps
as the experts and influencers take him more seriously, he will take himself
and his statements more seriously. Whether this happens or not, the question
will stay with stay us: What does it mean to support Donald Trump? I suspect we
will be asking this question for a very long time.
No comments:
Post a Comment