By Jonah Goldberg
Friday, September 15, 2017
So as Bill Clinton said to the intern the next morning
when she asked him, “What’s my name?”: I got nothing.
It feels like pretty much everything that can be said
about the DACA “deal” has been said already, though it hasn’t been said by
everybody quite yet.
But here’s something that you haven’t heard much,
certainly not from me: President Trump has had a pretty good few weeks. This is
certainly true when grading on a curve based on his previous weeks’
performance. But that’s a bit like plotting the high points of a dead-cat
bounce. No, he’s actually had a legitimately good week or two.
You see, for presidents — and other carbon-based life
forms — what counts as a “success” isn’t always what you do, but what you
avoid.
(I learned this lesson as a young man after I was
kidnapped and forced to live in the fetid dungeons set up for the illegal
fighting pits deep below Prague. Any day you could avoid fighting Günther the
Undying with his preferred weapon — a long motorcycle chain with a cinderblock
at the end — was a good day. The whoosh-whoosh-whoosh-smack-splat sound of that
chunk of concrete hitting my friend Lothar’s head still gives me shivers.
That’s why I mastered the “Pick him! Pick him!” eyeball gesture, which I still
use every now and then when Lowry walks into a meeting and says something like,
“Who wants to write the editorial about debt reduction in the next budget?” It
works as well on Ramesh as it did on Lothar.)
Whether you want to give President Trump 100 percent of
the credit or just some sane amount, the fact is that the federal response to
two daunting hurricanes has been, by all accounts, a very good one. I think
presidents play a much smaller role in these things than the press (and the
public) like to pretend. But you can be sure that if the response had gone
badly or if there were even a few convenient excuses to attack Trump over the
administration’s response, he would have gotten a ton of blame. Dogs that don’t
bark don’t get a lot of attention from the press, but I think people notice these
things (hurricane ratings dwarf the typical Politburo-sized panel discussion on
Russian collusion).
Then there’s the fact that Trump reached out to the
Democrats. Wearing my partisan hat, I want to melt into the Balkan hills and
fight the Nazis. Wearing my political
partisan hat, however, I don’t like the idea of striking deals with “Chuck and
Nancy.” As a conservative, I would prefer it if Trump were more inclined to use
DACA as a bargaining chip, as I write in my column today and as NR elucidates
in our editorial for the umpteenth time.
But as an objective matter, triangulation in politics is
almost always a smart move, at least at first. Do it too much or pick the wrong
thing to triangulate on, and it can blow up on you. But as a general
proposition, Chuck Schumer was right on the hot mike — whoops, sorry, I meant
hot mic. (Chuck on the hot Mike would
be different). Anyway, on Thursday, Schumer was (allegedly) caught by a hot mic
on the Senate floor saying:
Here’s what I told him: “Mr.
President, you are much better off sometimes stepping right and sometimes step
left. [If] you have to step just in one direction, you’re boxed.”
This has been a central insight of presidential politics
for as long as left and right had any meaning in American life. FDR was
slipperier than a greased dachshund; Nixon alternated between using a chair and
a whip on conservatives and feeding them red meat; George W. Bush touted
himself as a “compassionate conservative” and started his presidency by working
with Ted Kennedy on education. Bill Clinton smoked pot but didn’t inhale, said
he agreed with opponents of the first Persian Gulf War but would have voted
with supporters, picked vacation spots based on how they polled with swing
voters, and liked Miller Lite because it was less filling and it tasted great. He followed Yogi Berra’s advice in all things:
When you come to a fork in the road, take it. More on that in a minute.
The point is that Trump’s reaching out to the opposition
party is normal behavior for
presidents. They understand that simply pandering to the base will hurt you
with the meaty chunk of voters in the middle of the ideological bell curve.
That’s why even when Barack Obama did radical things, he sold them as
commonsense “pragmatic” policies. The Left knew what it was getting, and many
in the middle thought it all sounded reasonable enough.
The Shock of The
New
There are two reasons why Trump’s maneuver seems so weird
and came as such a shock to the leaders of Trump Inc., as well as to some of
the Trump voters suffering from political Stockholm syndrome. First, Trump’s
presidency hasn’t been “normal” in the same way a fluorescent-green cycloptic
grizzly bear wearing Mr. Rogers’s sweater as he plays Chopin on a banjo is not
“typical.”
The second reason, which is obviously related to the
first, is that he’s simply winging it. I am convinced Trump agreed to the
debt-ceiling deal last week on the fly in the Oval Office as way to piss off
Mitch McConnell and nothing more. He liked the results in the media so, like
the tic-tac-toe chicken I mentioned in last week’s “news”letter, he kept
pecking in that direction.
If you believed that it was normal for a commander in
chief to pull the oars of his White House based on the drumbeats coming from Fox & Friends and Sean Hannity,
seeing him suddenly veer off course must come as quite a shock to the system.
I’m sure that dude in Grizzly Man,
who really believed he was in perfect harmony with the bears of Alaska,
couldn’t have been more shocked when his friend started eating his face.
No comments:
Post a Comment