By George Will
Saturday, July 22, 2017
Montgomery, Ala.
— The aircraft arrayed around the spacious lawn of Maxwell Air Force Base, home
of the Air University, mostly represent long-retired types. The largest,
however, is a glistening B-52 bomber, which represents a still-employed
component of the Air Force’s aging fleet: The youngest B-52 entered service in 1962. Sons have flown the same
plane their fathers and grandfathers flew.
But, then, the average age of all the Air Force aircraft
is 27 years; fighters, more than 30 years; bombers and helicopters, more than
40 years; refueling tankers more than 50 years. America’s security challenges
change much faster — think of the Soviet Union’s demise and the Islamic State’s
rise — than new technologies can be conceived, designed, approved, built, and
deployed. The F/A-18 and the F-16 were designed about 45 years ago.
On Apr. 15, 1953, two U.S. soldiers in Korea were
attacked and killed by a propeller-driven aircraft supporting Chinese and North
Korean troops. Since then, no U.S. ground troops have been attacked by an enemy
aircraft. Such has been the permissive environment guaranteed by U.S. air
dominance, not since Vietnam has a U.S. pilot used his aircraft’s bullets to
down an enemy fighter plane (although air-to-air missiles downed enemy aircraft
over the Balkans).
The Air Force’s dominance in controlling the air and in
supporting ground troops might have been what an F-16 pilot here calls a
“catastrophic success,” distracting attention from the rapidly evolving challenge
of multi-domain, combined-arms warfare on land, on and under the sea, in the
air, and in space and cyberspace.
From Dec. 8, 1941, through Aug. 5, 1945 — the day before
Hiroshima — there were no radical technological disjunctions during World War II.
Aircraft, aircraft carriers, tanks, and radar were pre-Pearl Harbor
technologies. Future wars, however, will be won by information superiority that
produces superior decisions. Which means that China gave a chilling glimpse of
the future when in January 2007 it successfully launched an anti-satellite
weapon.
Beginning with the liberation of Kuwait in 1991, airpower
has been the first, and sometimes the only, recourse of presidents. In 1991,
six weeks of air attacks enabled U.S. ground forces to finish Iraq’s army in
100 hours. In 1999, in three months of combat over Serbia and Kosovo, airpower
sufficed to enable diplomacy to attain the political objectives. In 1991, in
the first night of the Gulf War air campaign, U.S. airpower struck more targets
than the Eighth Air Force struck in Europe in all of 1942 and 1943.
These recent episodes may, however, be remembered not as
harbingers of future conflicts but as punctuations ending an era. In this, its
70th year as an independent service, the Air Force, like the other branches of
the military, but more than any other, is being required to rethink its mission
in light of rapidly evolving threats and technologies.
The Air Force is in charge of two legs of the
nuclear-deterrence triad — strategic bombers and Minuteman ICBMs — but also has
been delivering 70 percent of the bombs against ISIS. For decades, the Air
Force’s strategic role was defined by President Dwight Eisenhower’s
configuration of U.S. forces for long-range deterrence of the Soviet Union in
order to reduce the need for massive forward-based forces. In 2009, Defense
secretary Robert M. Gates, who perhaps possesses broader knowledge and
experience of national-security matters than any American has ever had, said:
“If the Department of Defense can’t figure out a way to defend the United
States on a budget of more than half a trillion dollars a year, then our
problems are much bigger than anything that can be cured by a few more ships
and planes.” Indeed, safety might come from buying fewer ships and planes, and
more drones.
And developing hypersonic (more than five times the speed
of sound) weapons that can strike anywhere in the world in less than an hour.
And electromagnetic kinetic weapons (railguns) with muzzle velocities of 5,000
miles per hour, twice as fast as the muzzle velocity of a high-caliber bullet. Directed-energy
laser-based weapons operating at the speed of light are about 134,000 times
faster than railguns.
What Air Force people call “fast movers” — fighter
planes, the fastest bombers — are mere plodders compared to weapons that are
not far over the horizon. And compared to the pace of geo-strategic and
technological changes that challenge even the fine Air University’s capacity to
comprehend them.
No comments:
Post a Comment