By Michael Brendan Dougherty
Wednesday, May 10, 2017
For the first two months of her job, Nikki Haley was
blazing her own trail as the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. Sounding
more like Trump’s defeated GOP primary opponents than Trump himself, she
announced that sanctions against Russia would not end until Crimea was returned
to an independent Ukraine. She was asked if she was on the same page as the
president. “Look, he’s the president,” she said. “He can say what he wants
whenever he wants, but the direction we’ve gotten is to do our jobs, make sure
that the United States is strong, and that’s what we’ll do.” “I’m following the
spirit, not the letter” is a deft excuse, but eventually the secretary of state
informed Haley that from here on out she’d need to defend Trump’s policies on
big issues, not announce her own.
Ten days ago, the Wall
Street Journal reported that National Security Adviser General H. R.
McMaster went behind the president’s back to reassure America’s South Korean
allies that the United States would pay for a new missile-defense system that
Trump had previously threatened to cancel if South Korea didn’t pay up.
Then on Monday, a reporter for Canada’s National Post relayed that White House
officials had called Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to encourage him to reach
out to their boss and convince him to not withdraw the United States from
NAFTA. This strange gambit has been credited by Breitbart financial reporter John Carney to Mr. Ivanka himself,
Jared Kushner. Although now other theories circulate, holding out hope that
Kushner was merely facilitating communication between allies that would have
happened anyway. After all, Canada is part of Kushner’s portfolio, just after
bringing peace to the Middle East, managing relations in the Pacific, and selling
America on $1 trillion of infrastructure spending.
In the cases of Haley and McMaster, Trump or
administration sources have aired their grievances. Trump joked that Haley was
easily replaceable. And Trump allies told Bloomberg’s
Eli Lake that the boss was fuming about McMaster. Perhaps discount the
Kushner-saves-NAFTA story until Trump jokes about demoting him from Ivanka’s
husband to Tiffany’s.
Trump was always going to have trouble taking possession
of the executive branch upon his election. Doing so requires hiring thousands
of people and top officials who are committed to your vision. As a populist
outsider who did not command deep loyalty from his own party, Trump was never
going to have that kind of bench. Foreign policy in particular was going to be
a challenge when dozens of Republican-leaning foreign-policy scholars and wonks
signed an open letter denouncing Trump during his campaign.
I know what you’re thinking. You’d rather have Haley,
McMaster, and (gulp) Jared Kushner than Trump leading on these matters. Fair
enough. But some clarity about U.S. intentions is going to matter. This week,
Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the leader of U.S. ally Turkey, is picking a rhetorical
fight with U.S. ally Israel. If those allies get into a larger fight, do you
want American policy to turn on whether or not hotel investors from Istanbul or
Ramat Gan have the right phone number for Ivanka? Until the Trump
administration effectively sets priorities and finishes hiring cabinet
under-secretaries, it just might.
The confusion and chaos is a reflection of the man
himself. America’s prosperity and power depends on its having a self-governing
people. But now it doesn’t even have a self-governing president. Trump veers
from one policy stance to another, seemingly when the mood strikes him. He
hires personnel based not on policy affinity or competence, but on whether they
look the part.
In the absence of presidential leadership, what else can
we expect but for subordinates to rush in to fill the void? Haley speaks first
to commit the United States and her party to America’s moral leadership in the
Middle East and Eastern Europe, often plainly contradicting the campaign
promises of Trump. Kushner dashes in to make sure that Trump doesn’t blow up a
trade arrangement in which two of America’s closest allies have invested so
much. McMaster rushes to reassure longstanding allies that the U.S. is still
committed to their security. One fears that in the end, we’ll all be rushing to
pick up the pieces.
No comments:
Post a Comment