By David French
Wednesday, May 03, 2017
With all due apologies for language and content, I’d like
you to watch the two short excerpts of the “political comedy” — actually just
crude mockery — of Stephen Colbert.
In both, he makes essentially the same joke about Donald
Trump fellating Vladimir Putin. (Hilarious and creative, right?) The truly
troubling thing isn’t the joke itself — there will always be comedians willing
to go low for a laugh, after all — but the crowd’s reaction.
Watch again. Listen to the screaming and cheering.
If you want an explanation for why the Colberts of the
world say the things they do, there it is in the adulation of the audience. He
is their voice. He’s speaking out their rage. He’s not leading them; he’s
riding their wave of progressive scorn, anger, and hate. If he fell, another
would rise to take his place. Angry progressives demand cathartic mockery, and
they shall have it one way or another.
Which is not to say that this phenomenon is unique to the
Left. Spend time with core Trump supporters, the folks who boarded the train
early, and you’ll find that many of them genuinely love the president’s angry, personal schoolyard taunts. They glory
in his trolling and relish every single liberal tantrum it prompts.
It’s not just Trump, either. Countless thousands of
conservatives laughed heartily when Milo Yiannopoulos called comedienne Leslie
Jones a “black dude.” (So creative! So funny!) Some of these same conservatives
ripped anyone who asked for better discourse as a “cuck” or a “beta” unwilling
to do what was necessary to win. Angry conservatives demand vicious insults,
and they shall have them.
There was an interesting phenomenon that took hold on AM
radio last year. Conservative talk-show hosts who were used to leading found
instead that they faced a stark choice: follow their audience onto the Trump
train or face an unrelenting, angry backlash. Conservatives had been begging
for warriors for years, and when Trump stepped up and truly fought the Clintons and the mainstream
media, they had no patience for anyone who would try and restrain him.
Yes, Stephen Colbert is responsible for his actions. Of
course he went too far. But it’s time to understand that when it comes to
elections, to ratings, and to pop culture “moments,” the demagogue goes nowhere
without the people. Without the demand, there is no supply.
“To wander around America is to discover the happy
reality that most liberals and most conservatives are perfectly nice, not
particularly smug, and seldom if ever vitriolic,” Conor Friedersdorf recently
observed in The Atlantic. Yes indeed.
And to wander around a college campus is to discover the “happy reality” that
most students and faculty members dislike rioters and radicals, and just want
to finish their degrees or immerse themselves in their research.
The problem is that this silent majority is largely
irrelevant to the prevailing discourse. Our political and cultural agenda is
typically dictated by those who care the most, and right now those who care the
most also tend to hate their opponents on the other side with a fiery,
reflexive passion. Colbert’s crowd may be smaller than, say, the less-political
Jimmy Fallon’s, but it is much, much more likely to set the terms of the
American discussion.
In short, the people who truly care move this country,
and the people who truly care are truly angry. Their anger is so all-consuming
that it often forecloses the possibility of a debate about ideas. One of the
more remarkable things about the 2016 election was that it was simultaneously
the most vitriolic of my adult lifetime and
the least ideological. Trump and Clinton were and are extraordinarily
malleable, driven by self-interest above all else. Trump shifts positions
almost daily. Yet the partisan devotion remains. Hillary is celebrated as a
martyr to the progressive cause, and Trump’s base holds firm behind him.
There is nothing new under the sun. In ancient times, the
people were forced to choose between Jesus and Barrabas, and they chose
Barrabas. They choose him still today. There is no shortage of opportunists
willing to fill his shoes, just as there is no shortage of onlookers willing to
chant his name. The sad irony here is that Colbert himself is a Christian, a
man who has spoken frequently and with great feeling about his faith.
Hopefully, he will soon remember its commands.
No comments:
Post a Comment