By Jonah Goldberg
Friday, January 01, 2016
If you’re opposed to slavery, is it okay to still like Star Wars?
It’s a question I’ve been wrestling with ever since
Jonathan Last, a friend and writer at The
Weekly Standard, pointed out to me that the “droids” in the Star Wars movies are slaves. Unlike a
lot of the ridiculous Star Wars
revisionism in recent years — much of it ushered in by Last himself when he argued
that Darth Vader & Co. are in fact the good guys — Last’s case that droids
are slaves strikes me as nearly incontrovertible. I’d hoped to be persuaded
otherwise when I went to see the The
Force Awakens. No such luck.
C-3P0 and R2-D2, as well as newcomer BB-8, are all
sentient beings. They’d not only ace the Turing test for artificial
intelligence, they’d pass the Oprah Winfrey test for emotional intelligence.
(I’m just assuming one exists.) They feel joy and grief and exhibit loyalty,
too. Loyalty, that is, to their masters. That’s right, they call them
“masters.”
It’s possible that droids are like shmoos, the fictional
creatures imagined by Al Capp in Li’l
Abner. Shmoos only aim to please. They want no money, they don’t need to
eat, and they are more than happy to be eaten. (If you look at one with hungry
intent, it will spontaneously roast itself.)
The problem is that there is no evidence the droids are
shmoo-like in any way. In the first movie, when the slave-trading Jawas capture
R2-D2 and C-3PO, they have to restrain the fugitive droids, lest they run away.
Droids fear “deactivation” and seem to feel pain as well. They’re artificial
people, and they’re real slaves.
If you’re not convinced, you can read Last’s full
indictment at the Washington Free Beacon.
But since I’m convinced, two questions come to mind.
First: What am I supposed to think about all this? We’ll come back to that.
And, second, why didn’t anyone notice until now?
After all, it’s not like there aren’t a lot of people out
there desperate to take offense at just about anything slavery-related. You
might think the question answers itself, since droids aren’t people. Yeah,
except the use of “master” and “slave” to describe hard drives has been
controversial for over a decade. Los Angeles County banned the terminology in
2003. Yale University is reportedly doing away with the term “master” for some
administrators because of its supposedly troubling connotations.
A more likely answer is that the self-appointed censors
missed the widespread slavery in Star
Wars because they tend to think that slavery was a uniquely American
institution. It wasn’t. Slavery was ubiquitous and constant throughout human
history until the 19th century (and it survives in some corners of the world
today). What was unique about American slavery was American hypocrisy. A
country founded on human equality and inalienable rights should have been the
last place where humans could be held as property.
Droid slavery might have looked much more familiar to
citizens of ancient Rome, where the value of slave loyalty was celebrated for
centuries. R2-D2 is a very loyal slave. C-3PO is a bit mouthy.
Through an American prism, Turkish slavery seems as
otherworldly as Star Wars slavery.
But the similarities are striking. The Turks relied on slaves to manage their
civil service and fight their wars. You could even make quite a career as a
slave. Sokollu Mehmed Pasha was a slave and the de facto ruler of the Ottoman
Empire for 15 years.
As for what to think about the slavery in “Star Wars,” I’m still struggling. Maybe
when humans design sentient computers, there’s nothing wrong with programming
them to be eternally loyal. Maybe.
That makes me think about how our understanding of the
past is constantly changing, not because we have new facts about what happened
yesterday, but because we have new understanding about who we are today. Some
old movies are hard to watch because of the ways blacks or Native Americans or
gays are depicted. My daughter loves I
Love Lucy and Little House on the
Prairie, but sometimes she asks very good and pointed questions about why
girls were expected to stay at home. People saw things differently then, I
explain.
If there comes a day when we make sentient and
emotionally complex androids, we may have to have similar conversations with
them about the Star Wars franchise.
Best not to show them Blade Runner at
all.
No comments:
Post a Comment