By Robert Tracinski
Monday, January 11, 2016
A specter is haunting Europe. The specter of Islam.
George W. Bush used to say that we had to fight the
terrorists over there, in the Middle East, so we wouldn’t have to fight them
here at home. A long period of relative security made that claim seem
overblown, like a lame justification for interventionism. But it just might
turn out that he was right, and that it is even more true for Europe than it is
for us.
I was reminded of this reading about the curtailed New
Year’s Eve celebrations in Paris.
About 60,000 police officers and troops were deployed across the
country, and revelers said that made them feel safer. “The same troops who used
to be in Mali, Chad, French Guyana or the Central African Republic are now
ensuring the protection of French people,” said Defense Minister Jean-Yves Le
Drian.
In Belgium, the New Year’s Eve festivities were canceled
entirely.
In Brussels, 2016 was rung in without the customary fireworks display
and downtown street party…. Earlier this week, Belgian authorities announced
they had arrested two men suspected of planning to stage attacks in Brussels
over the holidays…. On Thursday morning, forklifts and trucks removed
generators and other equipment from the Place de Brouckere, the broad square in
central Brussels where the fireworks show was supposed to happen.
In Paris, they were significantly scaled down.
Paris canceled its usual fireworks display in favor of a five-minute
video performance at the Arc de Triomphe just before midnight, relayed on
screens along the Champs Elysee, where people chanted. Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo
said the show was aimed at “sending the world the message that Paris is
standing, proud of its lifestyle and living together.”
Well, no, if Paris were standing tall, it would have had
its usual celebrations. Fireworks have an interesting symbolism, recalling the
sights and sounds of war. Presumably that’s the problem this year: fireworks
would be good cover for another shooting rampage. In the United States, legend
has it that the reason we have fireworks on the Fourth of July is to remember
the wars we fought to gain and keep our independence — the rockets’ red glare,
the bombs bursting in air. But you only want to remember that if you won the
war. If you’re losing, I can see why you wouldn’t be so excited about the
fireworks.
The most dispiriting thing said about Paris was from a
Parisienne on the street: “It was a very strange year, and we just want 2016 to
be different, simply a normal one. It does not need to be an excellent one, but
just a normal one.” Way to aim high.
But I doubt 2016 is going to be a normal year for
Europeans. German officials just admitted that a little more than half of a
wave of attacks during New Year’s Eve celebrations in Cologne were by North
African and Middle Eastern asylum seekers who have flooded into the country
during the Syrian civil war and have been welcomed under a foolishly,
sanctimoniously overgenerous refugee policy.
The most disturbing thing about the Cologne attacks was
the prevalence of sexual assault as a weapon, complete with gangs of Muslim men
stalking German women through the streets, yelling obscenities at them and
threatening them with sexual violence. Note to Western feminists: we finally
found real “rape culture” for you. Unfortunately, it is not found primarily
among middle-class American college boys, which is what you were hoping for.
This is
“normal” — if that word can be applied here — in the Arab and Muslim world.
Wherever large crowds gather, unaccompanied women are in danger. (Remember the
brutal attack on CBS reporter Lara Logan during the Egyptian revolution.) This
is a measure of the extent to which the culture of Islam, as it is practiced in
much of the world, deranges and brutalizes its believers, particularly when it
comes to their attitudes toward women and sex. This is what has now arrived in
the heart of a free, civilized, enlightened Europe.
But take heart, some people in Europe are really thinking
ahead. The famed Italian fashion house Dolce & Gabbana in now offering
high-end hijabs. So yes, it turns out that burqas do come in sizes.
This is an inauspicious start to 2016 — but it is exactly
what we should expect after 2015, which was the year the Specter of Islam rose
to loom high over the capitals of Europe.
Last year was bookended by parallel events in France and
the United States. The year began with the Charlie
Hebdo massacre in Paris, in which French jihadists with ties to ISIS wiped
out the top staff of an irreverent magazine that had flouted Islamic restrictions
— followed in March by the thwarted attack on Pamela Geller’s Draw Mohammed
contest in Garland, Texas. The year drew to an end with a large, coordinated
jihadist shooting attack on multiple targets across Paris, followed by the San
Bernardino massacre in the US.
In these attacks, we can see three clear patterns.
First, radical Muslims attack the mind first, then the
body. In a revealing statement, Secretary of State John Kerry blurted out that
he found the Charlie Hebdo attacks
understandable, with a “legitimacy” or at least a “rationale” about enforcing
Islamic restrictions. But that’s an utterly false distinction. Yes, the
jihadists’ first targets in the West are going to be those people who use
words, ideas, and art to challenge Islam. But those are only the first targets, not the last. As the attacks at the end of
the year demonstrated, the jihadists ultimately want to wipe out all the
infidels, not just the outspoken few. And as the New Year’s Eve attacks
demonstrate, their target isn’t just artists who draw provocative cartoons but
women whose “provocation” is not to cover themselves in public from head to
foot.
Second, the attacks in the US are smaller, less
organized, and less successful than in Europe. This reflects the fact that
Muslims in the US is a smaller percentage of the population and better
assimilated to American values. Fewer are attracted to the cause of jihad, and
they are less able to work with people around them to plan and organize. (And,
as I noted after the Garland attack, America is generally a harder target.) But
among the small number of violent radicals, the full murderous intent is there,
even if the means are not as effective. Europe is the front line, but we’re not
far behind.
This can be seen in the first Islam-inspired terror
attack of the New Year: the shooting of a Philadelphia police officer by a man
who pledged loyalty to ISIS and said he did it “in the name of Islam.” He will
no doubt be dismissed as No True Muslim.
And that leads us to the third lesson: we have a
president who is resolutely opposed to learning any of the other lessons.
Instead, he is focusing all of his efforts on doing what little he can to
disarm Americans. Unfortunately, judging from the presidential debates — in
which the Democratic participants steadfastly refused to use the phrase
“radical Islam” — we’re not going to get any better from the next round of
Democratic candidates.
The rise of the Islamic State and its ability to inspire
and organize terrorists attacks in the West, combined with the Democrats’
refusal to confront this threat, sets up one of the big questions for 2016,
particularly as the Republican primaries actually go to a vote in the next two
months. This must now be a national security election, and by that standard the
only interesting debate is between Republican candidates Marco Rubio and Ted
Cruz.
I don’t expect our current president to do much of
anything about the threat of Islam, or to help the Europeans with it, during
his remaining term in office. Instead, we have the rest of this year to decide
how we would like the next president to deal with it.
Because the specter of Islam is haunting us all.
No comments:
Post a Comment