By David French
Tuesday, January 26, 2016
Among the more amusing responses to National Review’s
“Against Trump” editorial effort was the claim that Dr. Frankenstein was
turning on its monster. In other words, we at National Review created the
allegedly racist, xenophobic conditions necessary for Donald Trump’s rise.
Here’s the New Republic’s Jeet Heer articulating the conventional wisdom:
There is very little that Trump has said or done that can’t find prior
sanction in National Review, be it racism, anti-immigrant nativism, or sexism.
In the last debate, in response to an attack on his “New York values,” Trump
noted that conservatives do come from New York and cited William F. Buckley. It
is fair to see Trump’s version of white identity politics as firmly in the
tradition of Buckley and his magazine.
And Heer’s not alone. Media Matters helpfully compiled
multiple additional examples under the headline “They Built This.”
I have two responses. First — and most obvious — it’s
simply false to ascribe widespread conservative concern over immigration to
“white identity politics.” Does the Left really believe that National Review or
its readers would be indifferent to the national-security concerns of
anti-American terrorists attempting to infiltrate the ranks of, say, Latvian or
Norwegian immigrants? Would our economic concerns be any less valid if large
numbers of low-skilled Greek immigrants were depressing blue-collar wages and
straining social services?
Calling out alleged “white identity politics” is an
excellent way to avoid having to debate conservatives. After all, who needs to
debate racists? As my friend Ravi Zacharias frequently observes — in the battle
of ideas, stigma tends to defeat dogma. In other words, if you can shame and
insult your opposition, then you never have to engage their ideas.
At the same time, however, a small group of online trolls
have indeed gathered under Trump’s banner. Calling themselves the “alt-right,”
they’re a motley group of white nationalists and wanna-be fascists. They’ve
become adept at flooding Twitter feeds and comments boards, giving the illusion
of large-scale online strength. While it’s difficult to determine how many
actual American voters belong to the alt-right (versus the number who are busy
tweeting from their mom’s basement in Austria), they do exist, and they’ve
succeeded in elbowing their way into the national conversation.
But who’s to blame? First and foremost: They are.
Individuals are responsible for their own ideology and actions. At the same
time, however, people respond to their environment, and it is entirely
predictable that race obsession will yield more race obsession, and the
consequences are rarely desirable or controllable.
If anyone besides the members of the alt-right is
responsible for the latest iteration of whiteness-obsessed fanaticism, is it
the conservative movement that is consistently calling for a colorblind
politics and culture — echoing Martin Luther King’s call to look to the content
of one’s character over the color of one’s skin? Or is it the progressive
movement that pushes explicitly race-based organizations such as La Raza or
Black Lives Matter while specifically scorning whites, Western civilization,
and so-called white privilege?
The Left has elevated a man — Ta-Nehisi Coates — to the
pantheon of public intellectuals whose expressions of contempt for his white
fellow citizens are so pervasive that, if the roles were reversed, he’d be
relegated to the darkest corners of the hateweb. The Left is imposing race
obsession on its presidential candidates to the extent that they’re now afraid
even to declare that “all lives matter.” Does the Left really believe that such
nonsense will spawn only productive and thoughtful critiques?
The Left is fond of saying that “violence begets
violence.” It’s a tired trope, but it contains a kernel of truth — people do
tend to respond to violence with more violence. But doesn’t racial obsession
beget racial obsession? All my life I’ve been part of a conservative movement
that has been struggling mightily to move the culture past the politics of race
and into a politics of universal human dignity, with each of us created in the
image of God. It’s a tall order, made more challenging by the complex interplay
of history, culture, and man’s fallen nature, but our task has been made even
more difficult by leftist political warfare that empowers and enriches itself
by exploiting and perpetuating the historical, cultural, and racial grievances
that have plagued our culture (and virtually every culture on the face of the
Earth).
Who “built” modern white identity politics? White
supremacists did, but along the way the Left has handed them the bricks and
mortar to construct their edifice of hate. The blame for race obsession belongs
to the race obsessives — of all ideological stripes.
No comments:
Post a Comment