By Jonah Goldberg
Friday, January 03, 2014
On January 1, the Centennial State (it hasn’t yet changed
its nickname to “The Rocky Mountain High State”) became the first place in the
country to legalize marijuana sales for recreational purposes.
And Brandon Harris is stoked.
The 24-year-old Harris drove 20 hours from Cincinnati,
along with a smoking buddy, to be the first Ohioans to buy legal pot in
Colorado.
“It’s such a big day in history,” Harris, told the
Washington Times. “The fact that we don’t have to be criminals and can just
smoke, and not be looked down on, or have to mess with the local police.”
Well, he’s mostly right. Americans are still free — for
now, at least — to look down on people for whatever reason we want. Simply
because an activity is legal doesn’t mean I am barred from judging you
negatively for engaging in it.
Decorating your room from floor to ceiling with Justin
Bieber posters is perfectly legal — so long as you keep the paper a safe
distance from the votive candles on your Bieber shrine. But if I walked into my
doctor’s office and saw such a display, I would search for a new doctor pretty
quickly. The same goes if I found out he was a big pot smoker.
Whether you find that analogy insulting probably depends
on whether you smoke a lot of pot (or if you’re a “Belieber”).
But that’s okay with me. As non-judgmentalism becomes
part of the secular catechism, people lose sight of the fact that the freedom
to do what you want must include the freedom to form your own opinions about
how other people use their freedom.
Which brings us back to Mr. Harris. He and his pal were
so jazzed by the ability to buy pot legally, they decided to remain in Colorado
permanently.
“We’re staying,” he told the Denver Post. “We’re going to
become residents.”
Now, if I were an employer interviewing young Mr. Harris,
I might ask him, “What brought you to Colorado?” If he answered, “The legal
weed,” it’d be a pretty major strike against him. Personally, I think letting
dope become so important that you’re willing to uproot your whole life just so
you can have it legally all the time doesn’t speak well of you.
But that’s me. Others feel differently. And, if I’m going
to be honest, I can’t swear that if Washington, D.C., banned alcohol or
caffeine, I wouldn’t pull a Harris and ditch the District.
This is the way it’s supposed to work. People who want to
live one way vote with their feet and move to places where they can live the
way they want to live. It’s way too soon to know if Colorado’s collective
experiment will prove to be a mistake. It’s also too soon to know if some
Colorado residents will move to states where weed is illegal as a result. But
it’s an experiment worth conducting.
Pot-legalization advocates are fond of casting themselves
as the avant-garde of a new libertarian revolution sweeping the nation. I
generally hope they’re right. But I also hope we don’t lose sight of the
collective right of states and other legally recognized communities and
institutions to have the freedom to organize their lives the way they want.
I love America’s love of individual liberty. But no good
thing comes without a downside. Particularly since the “rights explosion” of the
1960s and 1970s, public-policy debates are too often framed as the individual
versus the government. Presented with that choice, Americans are going to err
on the side of individual rights. And that’s usually a good thing. The problem
is that the rights of a community — a town, a county, a state, a religious
organization, etc. — are left out of that formulation. And they matter.
Man is a social animal and wants to live in a community.
Hippies want raw milk, evangelicals want codes of decency, Amish want to reject
modern technology, the Sisters of the Poor don’t want to pay for birth control
under Obamacare. What’s wrong with that?
My objection to both the progressive vision of
one-size-fits-all government and some extreme notions of individual liberty is
that they both lack the imaginative sympathy required to let groups of people
organize their lives in the ways that will let the majority live the way they
want to live.
Why not let a thousand flowers bloom? If Colorado wants
to legalize weed, fine. If Alabama doesn’t, that’s fine too. Alabamians who
disagree can fight it out democratically, or they can follow Harris’s lead and
move.
No comments:
Post a Comment