By Elise Amyx
Saturday, January 18, 2014
Note: This column was co-authored by Jay W. Richards.
The debate over income inequality is a perennial one, but
President Obama has made it the cause du jour with a renewed emphasis in his
upcoming State of the Union speech. He has invoked Pope Francis in his renewed
campaign to brand inequality as the “defining challenge of our time.” Even New
York City mayor Bill de Blasio is getting in on the action.
These men are not lonely voices crying in the wilderness.
A 2013 Pew Research Center poll reports almost half of Americans believe the
wealth gap is a serious moral problem.
Poverty is unquestionably a serious concern, but even if
poverty were eradicated there would remain an enormous income gap between the
family living comfortably on $100,000 a year and people like Oprah Winfrey,
Bono and Bill Gates. So what exactly is the problem with income inequality?
Some think there is a theological problem. Jim Wallis has claimed—when calling
for an increase in the minimum wage—“God hates inequality.”
The Judeo-Christian tradition teaches that everyone is
created in the image of God, and so all people, whatever their social status,
should be treated with dignity and as equals before the law. There’s a lot
about greed in the Bible, but not a single passage of Scripture or traditional
Judeo-Christian teaching suggests that income inequality, in itself, is a moral
evil.
In the Old Testament, Job and Abraham were wealthy and
held up as righteous. In the New Testament, Jesus tells His Apostles they will
sit on twelve thrones in the kingdom of God. So far as we know, nobody else
will get those thrones. Then, too, in the early church, wealthy members gave
out of their wealth to help those in need, but the redistribution that occurred
was not a forced leveling but a voluntary generosity. And income differences
persisted since the early church met in the large homes of their wealthier
members.
So why are so many Americans, including religious
Americans, concerned about income inequality?
One reason is an economic misconception. Many assume that
the economy is a zero-sum game, in which Peter’s wealth can only come from
Paul’s poverty, thus they tend to view a wealth gap as evidence of theft.
But that’s not how a market economy works. We all know
this when it comes to, say, smartphones and groceries. Steve Jobs didn’t become
rich by stealing i-Pads from homeless people. He got rich by creating value for
others, including millions of people less wealthy than he was. Ditto for your
local grocer. The farmers grew the food, but the grocer also generates value by
orchestrating a service that allows you to acquire a wide variety of food items
safely and conveniently.
Wealth, in other words, can be created rather than merely
transferred from one account to the other. Do we really want a society in which
those who can create the most wealth are punished for doing so?
Though each of us is equal in the eyes of God, and should
be equal before the law, we have diverse skills, passions and physical
attributes. Where this is obvious, and where the contribution of those talents
is easily grasped, people are unlikely to complain. Few publicly begrudge the
incomes of professional athletes, actors and high tech entrepreneurs. The
greedy one percenters we hear about are invariably Wall Street bankers and
corporate CEOs, those doing jobs whose value is difficult to grasp because the
contribution is abstract.
There are nations that acted on this animus against
finance, labeling the business class as leeches and sending them out into the
fields either to be killed or do subsistence farming. Those economies imploded,
so apparently high-level business managers actually do perform something useful
and hard to replicate.
It would be easy to end there, but there’s another
wrinkle that when ironed out reveals a legitimate complaint against Wall Street
bankers and corporate CEOs. Some seem to have acquired their wealth through
political connections rather than value creation. That’s cronyism, not
capitalism. And many Americans rightly view cronyism as a moral outrage, since
it substitutes the voluntary exchanges of a market for the coercive power of
the state.
Rather than fixating on income inequality, then, we
should focus on the real problems: poverty, cronyism and the human capacity
wasted due to high unemployment. The significant “gap” is not between the
homeless and the Tom Bradys of the World, or between the McDonald’s employees
and all the Fortune 500 CEOs. The real divide is between the cronies in
Washington and everyone else, including the poor and unemployed. Vilifying and
punishing genuine wealth creation will remedy none of these problems.
No comments:
Post a Comment