By Thomas Sowell
Tuesday, January 21, 2014
Someone summarized Barack Obama in three words --
"educated," "smart" and "ignorant."
Unfortunately, those same three words would describe all too many of the people
who come out of our most prestigious colleges and universities today.
President Obama seems completely unaware of how many of
the policies he is trying to impose have been tried before, in many times and
places around the world, and have failed time and again. Economic equality?
That was tried in the 19th century, in communities set up by Robert Owen, the
man who coined the term "socialism." Those communities all collapsed.
It was tried even earlier, in 18th century Georgia, when
that was a British colony. People in Georgia ended up fleeing to other
colonies, as many other people would vote with their feet in the 20th century,
by fleeing many other societies around the world that were established in the
name of economic equality.
But who reads history these days? Moreover, those parts
of history that would undermine the vision of the left -- which prevails in our
education system from elementary school to postgraduate study -- are not likely
to get much attention.
The net results are bright people, with impressive
degrees, who have been told for years how brilliant they are, but who are often
ignorant of facts that might cause them to question what they have been
indoctrinated with in schools and colleges.
Recently Kirsten Powers repeated on Fox News Channel the
discredited claim that women are paid only about three-quarters of what a man
is paid for doing the same work.
But there have been empirical studies, going back for
decades, showing that there is no such gap when the women and men are in the same
occupation, with the same skills, experience, education, hours of work and
continuous years of full-time work.
Income differences between the sexes reflect the fact
that women and men differ in all these things -- and more. Young male doctors
earn much more than young female doctors. But young male doctors work over 500
hours a year more than young female doctors.
Then there is the current hysteria which claims that
people in the famous "top one percent" have incomes that are rising
sharply and absorbing a wholly disproportionate share of all the income in the
country.
But check out a Treasury Department study titled
"Income Mobility in the U.S. from 1996 to 2005." It uses income tax
data, showing that people who were in the top one percent in 1996 had their
incomes fall -- repeat, fall -- by 26 percent by 2005.
What about the other studies that seem to say the opposite?
Those are studies of income brackets, not studies of the flesh-and-blood human
beings who are moving from one bracket to another over time. More than half the
people who were in the top one percent in 1996 were no longer there in 2005.
This is hardly surprising when you consider that their
incomes were going down while there was widespread hysteria over the belief
that their incomes were going up.
Empirical studies that follow income brackets over time
repeatedly reach opposite conclusions from studies that follow individuals. But
people in the media, in politics and even in academia, cite statistics about
income brackets as if they are discussing what happens to actual human beings
over time.
All too often when liberals cite statistics, they forget
the statisticians' warning that correlation is not causation. For example the
New York Times crusaded for government-provided prenatal care, citing the fact
that black mothers had prenatal care less often than white mothers -- and that
there were higher rates of infant mortality among blacks.
But was correlation causation? American women of Chinese,
Japanese and Filipino ancestry also had less prenatal care than whites -- and
lower rates of infant mortality than either blacks or whites.
When statistics showed that black applicants for
conventional mortgage loans were turned down at twice the rate for white
applicants, the media went ballistic crying racial discrimination. But whites
were turned down almost twice as often as Asian Americans -- and no one thinks
that is racial discrimination.
Facts are not liberals' strong suit. Rhetoric is.
No comments:
Post a Comment