By Bruce Bialosky
Sunday, January 05, 2014
Now that Obamacare has actually been unleashed on the
unsuspecting American public, there is mass speculation about whether it will
succeed as a program. Each political side presents its arguments with many
former supporters caught in the middle. But if you understand how insurance
works, it is basic that the program cannot work without even more coercion than
is in the law as presently constituted.
Prior to the passing of this massive law, there was a
basic pattern how health insurance matters worked in most states, which is
where these decisions were made. The state had an insurance commissioner to
oversee insurance companies. The state legislatures would establish laws
regarding health insurance policies which were far more extensive than for auto
or homeowners’ insurance. The legislature would be lobbied by either a special
interest group or by a few “suffering” souls, and new mandatory benefits like
chiropractors or maternity care would be included in each policy. Basic
policies were larded up with so much that affordability became difficult for
families or businesses. Choice became limited as rules became dictated and
basic catastrophic policies became limited in their availability.
With all that being said, the insurance companies never
breached certain taboos which they knew would break the bank and make policies
soar beyond any reasonable economic sense. It was not because the insurance
companies were just cold, heartless corporate animals. These benefits were not
part of policies because the people who operate insurance companies knew
through sophisticated mathematical analysis they would have to charge such outlandish
fees that the average person would be overwhelmed financially.
In step the Democrats of Washington who had a guiding
light – equality. Everyone should bear the burden equally for the minority who
cannot instead of addressing those individuals in a different manner.
There are many “benefits” that were mandated by
Obamacare, but three were particularly financially unsustainable or corrupting:
1. The lifting of lifetime caps on benefits: The
insurance companies never did this because they cannot calculate what their
potential outlays would be in the future to be able to estimate what should be
properly charged to policy holders. They are shooting at an unknown and moving
target. They now have no choice but to jack up premiums to cover the potential costs.
2. Pre-existing conditions: The insurance companies
limited their exposure from new policyholders to highly-expensive illnesses
because they would have needed to either charge exorbitant rates to limited
individuals to cover the risks or massively increased the rates of others not
afflicted with the same ailments.
One might ask that since employer-sponsored plans do not
exclude people for pre-existing conditions now why this will be such a problem.
That is because the insurance companies are able to amortize their costs over
the members of the policy.
In this new situation they will just being throwing
people into an insurance group without any actuarial analysis. There is a
program that does that now – it is called Medicare. That is a large reason
expenditures for Medicare are out of control.
3. Equal charges for the two sex – Feminists never liked
that insurance companies charged more for health insurance for women than for
men. But you did not hear them arguing about auto insurance premiums that were
higher for young males than for young females? The reason those rates were
higher was because young males drove more and had more accidents. In
California, in an attempt at equality, Proposition 103 eliminated different
charges for males and females, so young girls were stuck with higher insurance
bills to cover their boyfriends’ errant behavior.
In the same manner, insurance companies were not charging
women more because the people who operated the companies hated their mothers.
It was because women use medical services more frequently than men and
therefore incur higher costs. They were charging the people who used the
services for what they were using.
All of these new policies as part of Obamacare are
wonderful in a make-believe world. But insurance is based on mathematical
calculations. Actuaries study pools of policy holders and then calculate based
on historical data what the projected outlays will be, then figure overhead and
profit above that. That is how they come up with a monthly fee for members of
their group.
Obamacare threw that all out the window. They figured on
a group of young people obtaining insurance at rates above what their medical
care experience would warrant. They have caused people to have significantly
increased premiums, most with much higher deductibles. That is all with what
for the most part are much smaller pools of providers (doctors and hospitals).
There are some winners, but most people are financial
losers. That was never explained to Americans, but now that it is hitting them
personally they are revolting. That is why there are so many penalties in the
law. This is not sustainable on its own without threats and coercion. You could
surmise that the writers of the bill new it would be hated. That is why
crafters of the legislation wrote so many penalties into the plan. If the plan
is so hotsy totsy people should be running to get it -- not running away?
One of two things will happen. The program will fail on
the weight of its outrageously expensive requirements, or it will remain in
place but only with the addition of much higher penalties and more threats of
actions against those who won’t willingly overpay for their health insurance.
We don’t believe the latter will be tolerated by the American people so we are
left with the former.
No comments:
Post a Comment