By Kurt Schlichter
Monday, January 13, 2013
Between global warming suckers getting entombed in ice
while trying to prove the Antarctic ice cap has melted to most of America doing
a Frigidaire impression, the entire façade of this bogus leftist power grab is
crumbling.
Understand that the climate change meme is simply the
latest attempt by leftists to trick society into remaking itself in their
image. It was never about science. It was always about power and money.
The scammers have been ably assisted by a palace guard
media that eagerly reports the scammers’ every lie while ignoring every
inconvenient truth. You’ll skim the mainstream media in vain for the reason
behind the trapped expedition’s trip to the Antarctic. And, of course, the most
inconvenient truth of all is that it hasn’t gotten significantly warmer since
the industrial revolution started generating CO2, and it hasn’t warmed at all
in recent years.
The left’s use of pseudo-science as a means to seize and
centralize control has a colorful history. One particularly colorful scheme was
the progressive nightmare of eugenics. Leftist icons like Margaret Sanger
eagerly advocated it as a tool to eliminate infants of color.
Let’s fast forward to the 1970s, when we were entering a
new ice age and the only possible solution was – surprise - more government
power. The global cooling panic morphed into the global warming panic.
Suddenly, temperatures were inexorably rising and the ice caps were melting. In
fact, they should be melted by now.
But “global warming” is problematic when the
uncherry-picked evidence shows that the Earth is not getting significantly
warmer. The hockey stick is stuck. Now, one might take this new evidence and
revise one’s conclusion to conform to the observed data. We call that science.
But we are dealing with “science,” and when the evidence doesn’t support your
conclusion you change the name of the phenomenon.
Hence, “climate change.” Its goal was stop us wacky
literalists from being able to point to a lack of warming to disprove global
warming. Apparently, we were fools to expect that what the scammers called
“warming” might involve warming.
“Climate change” is useful because it minimizes the
dangerous possibility of negating the theory through observation. Any kind of
change in the weather is “climate change.” That means literally any evidence
supports the theory. If you really want to tick off a scammer, ask him what
piece of observable data would lead him to conclude that his climate change
theory is incorrect.
Of course, in science, an unfalsifiable theory isn’t a
theory at all. But in “science,” you aren’t really talking about theories. You
are talking about politically necessary conclusions that are beyond question.
“Science” is a religion, and we’re the heretics.
But even “climate change” has become problematic. What if
the climate is not changing for the worse? Recent years have seen fewer
hurricanes, and of less intensity. The Antarctic ice the penguins stood on
while laughing at the trapped ship of fools was manifestly still there. Polar
bears continue to wander the northern wastes uncooked.
So the left has now moved to an even vaguer, less
empirically assessable concept – looming “climate collapse.” It’s a beautiful
notion, at once evoking some sort of horrendous catastrophe while offering
absolutely no way to evaluate its accuracy. The “climate collapse” remains off
in the future, vague and ambiguous, an unspecified disaster where something bad
might happen and no one can prove the negative, so there is no way to judge it
to be fact or fiction.
This is “science.” And if you doubt that something of an
undefined nature might possibly occur at some unknown point in the future and
maybe have unexplained negative effects, you reject “science” in all its forms.
You also probably believe in God and are definitely racist.
Climate change scam arguments pique my lawyerly interest
as exemplar tactics, techniques and procedures in the art of obfuscation. But
the nomenclature isn’t the only bit of dissembling. The scammers attempt to
intertwine the idea that human activity has some sort of impact on the climate
with their demand that we transfer to their control trillions of dollars and
much of our sovereignty. They intentionally erase the distinction between the
cause of the alleged problem and the proposed solution, neatly skipping the
effect.
Scammers tell us that 97% of scientists believe humans
have an effect on the climate. Of course humans have some effect on the
climate. A butterfly’s flapping wings have some effect on the climate. But the
mere fact of some effect of some unknown intensity does not lead to the
conclusion that we must undertake an anti-carbon crusade that will jack up our
utility bills several grand a year, force us to drive tiny boxes, and empower
yet another army of prissy unionized bureaucrats, this time to tell us we can’t
roast marshmallows in our own backyards.
If you believe in science, you can’t make that quantum
leap of logic. But if you believe in “science,” you and your media pals will
paint anyone who refuses to do so as a mouth-breathing halfwit “denier” who is
simultaneously an evil genius in the service of Big Oil.
Oh, how “scientists” hate deniers for actually applying
the scientific method to the scammers’ political propaganda. And, as fiascos
like Operation Mocking Penguin pile up, and as the coming climate collapse
never actually comes, they’ll get even more desperate. The Los Angeles Times
and Reddit recently barred dissenters from their pages – there’s no better
concession of defeat than silencing your opponent.
The science is settled that “climate change” was a lie
from the beginning. And every day without the long-promised climate catastrophe
is one day closer to the day leftists will have to find themselves a
replacement scam.
No comments:
Post a Comment