By Bruce Bialosky
Sunday, January 26, 2014
It all kind of started to fall apart when he said “… no
such thing as shovel-ready projects.” That was of course after he committed
more than $800 billion to government expenditures that would supposedly
stimulate the private economy after the 2008 financial crunch. The fact that
President Obama was so blindly ignorant about what it takes to get any
construction project done in this country -- with the burdensome laws in place
-- was foretelling of the avalanche of examples deflating the moniker foisted
upon us that our latest and greatest President was “our smartest President.”
Recently we were promised certain things by incoming
administrations. Bill Clinton promised the most “ethical administration,” and
we all know that lasted about three minutes give or take a few seconds. Obama
promised us and then continued telling us “We are the most transparent and
ethical administration in history.” We can say no one has gotten shot as
happened in the Clinton Administration, but certainly this is the least
transparent administration since William Henry Harrison. Even his allies
complain about not having access to info. The press corps photographers have
been cut out of participating in photo sessions and then are promised by press
secretary Jay Carney that the White House is working on it. But the boast of
Obama being “Our Smartest President” was endorsed by Obama’s followers and
embraced by the Obamas.
The question of the President’s aptitude revolves
principally around operation of the government. It would be different if he
were anti-government, wanting to slash and burn operations. One would think
that he would know about how government operates and then proceed to speak
intelligently about how it does. He often seems befuddled.
As was stated to Chris Matthews, “The challenge, I think,
that we have going forward is not so much my personal management style or
particular issues around White House organization,” Obama said. “It actually
has to do with what I referred to earlier, which is we have these big agencies,
some of which are outdated, some of which are not designed properly.” This is
something you would expect to be said by Ronald Reagan in the first year of his
presidency, not by Barack Obama after five years of being president --
especially after no previous comments regarding the inefficiency of the
gargantuan federal government.
The list of times he has pled ignorance staggers the
imagination. Chief among them are the AP records incident, the IRS targeting
scandal -- and the list goes on and on – after which and about which our
President steps up to a microphone and tells people that he had no idea. Of
course, then there are his many foreign policy issues that could be delineated.
The fact that he receives an intelligence briefing daily and then pleads no
knowledge of events makes one wonder what is being conveyed during those
meetings. One might think that there would be a discussion around September 4th
or 5th that the anniversary of 9/11 is coming up, and what is being done to
protect our personnel in foreign countries plus stopping attacks on the
Homeland. But our President was severely unprepared for what happened in
Benghazi and the aftermath. He did not even seem to know much once things were
happening, and then went to bed while our Ambassador was being murdered.
My personal favorite that questions the aptitude of our
President is his professed lack of knowledge that the NSA was listening in on
phone calls of foreign leaders. Some may say he was just denying the truth, but
I don’t believe so. The argument can be made that denying he knew makes him
look stupid, but not as stupid as if he knew of the program. And I do not
believe it was willful ignorance. Our President did not think to ask whether the
NSA was not just spying on foreign governments but spying on foreign leaders,
especially ones that are our friends. It just rankles the imagination that
Obama could be overseeing this program and not think to ask that question.
In the end those who attempted to convince us Obama is
such a smart guy have been betrayed by their own naiveté. It is characterized
by the column in New York Times detailing how Obama’s most loyal followers (New
York liberals) have been caught in the Obamacare debacle with cancelled
policies and soaring premiums. One of the intelligentsia who attempted to
convince us how brilliant our President is was quoted as saying this about
Obamacare – “I’m for it, but what is the reality of it?” Enough said.
No comments:
Post a Comment