By Mona Charen
Tuesday, January 21, 2014
Everyone knows by now that the governor (and possible
presidential contender) can be a hothead. Some have called him a bully. Even if
you think that's too strong, it's undeniable that a trace of bellicosity has
been important to what the professionals like to call his "brand."
Still, he shouldn't have said what he did in that radio
interview. However strongly he may feel about those who disagree, and certainly
he has his reasons for feeling aggrieved, he shouldn't have said that his
opponents "have no place" in his state. It's understandable,
considering the intemperance and intolerance he demonstrated, why the press is
going wild with this story.
What? Did you miss it? That's because it wasn't possible
presidential candidate and Republican Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey who
said those things about his opposite numbers, it was possible presidential
candidate and Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo of New York. Speaking on WCNY radio,
Cuomo told listeners that Republicans are in the midst of a civil war:
"Who are they? Are they these extreme conservatives
who are right-to-life, pro-assault weapon, anti-gay? Is that who they are?
Because if that's who they are, and if they are the extreme conservatives, they
have no place in the state of New York, because that's not who New Yorkers
are."
Naturally, there has been no outcry in the press. With
the exception of the vigilant Kathryn J. Lopez of National Review and a few
other "extremists," the interview had all the impact of a feather
floating onto a blade of grass.
Let's put the equivalent words into the mouth of
Christie. To do so, we must mischaracterize the Democrats' views as Cuomo was
caricaturing Republican views. "Pro-assault weapon"? Few second
amendment defenders see themselves as pro-assault weapon. The term
"assault weapon" is inexact -- and can sometimes amount to a matter
of cosmetics, not ballistics. In any case, people who resist gun control have
solid arguments and can be found in all counties of the state of New York.
Those who believe that the right to bear arms is a personal right that cannot
be unduly infringed by the state also form a majority of the members of the
United States Supreme Court. Are they not welcome in the state of New York?
As for "anti-gay," it isn't clear how Cuomo
would define the term, but he is presumably referring to people who oppose
same-sex marriage. Again, people who believe that a traditional understanding
of marriage is a key pillar of family and social life would not characterize
themselves as "anti-gay." They would observe, for example, that they
had also opposed liberalizing the divorce laws (New York was a
"pioneer" in that, too), and opposed the normalization of unwed
parenting. According to a 2012 Quinnipiac poll, "extremists" opposing
same-sex marriage still comprise about a third of New York State's population.
Are they "not who New Yorkers are"?
Cuomo has grouped those who call themselves
"pro-life" together with other "extremists." That's 48
percent of the U.S. population, according to a 2013 Gallup poll, and includes
31 percent of self-described Democrats, along with 46 percent of women and 51
percent of non-whites. Are they unwelcome extremists?
People who call themselves pro-life do so because they
believe that every human life, at every stage, is deserving of honor and human
dignity. They hold this view though they know it to be unfashionable. Fifty-one
percent of those surveyed told Gallup that they believed most Americans are
pro-choice, while the actual number who describe themselves that way was only 45
percent.
If Christie were to use comparable language about
Democrats, he'd probably have to describe them as "pro-criminal,
gun-confiscating, anti-Catholic bigots": "Pro-criminal" because
some Democrats have been opposed to the death penalty; "gun-confiscating"
because some Democrats have proposed gun-control measures; and
"anti-Catholic bigots" because the Democratic party is responsible
for Obamacare, which forces Catholic institutions and individuals to violate
their religious beliefs.
Obviously, such careless and inflammatory language from
the governor of a state -- all the more so when he is being mentioned as a
candidate for president -- would provoke a shrieking nervous breakdown by every
on-air personality at MSNBC. The cacophony would be only slightly less
pronounced on other outlets.
Conservatives are accustomed to slander. But in this
case, they should learn from the professional offense-takers on the other side
and demand that Cuomo apologize.
No comments:
Post a Comment