By
Augustin Forzani
Friday,
February 17, 2023
There is
no need for a “Buy American” program, much less an infrastructure plan.
In his
State of the Union address, President Biden doubled down on his strategy for his
ongoing infrastructure plan. He will require U.S.-made inputs in all public
works. Among the arguments in favor of the policy, two in
particular state that this strategy will create jobs and also protect America
against foreign goods that pose a national threat.
These
two arguments are wrong. The Buy American program will neither create jobs nor
enhance national security. It is possible to improve the U.S. economy without
an infrastructure plan, that is, without having to invest billions of taxpayer
dollars.
The
French economist Frederic Bastiat explained why public works do not create
jobs:
The state opens a road, constructs a palace, repairs a street, or digs a
canal; in doing this it provides work for certain workmen, that is what is
seen, but it deprives certain other workmen of employment, and that is what is
not seen.
The state
needs to collect taxes to build infrastructure. But the dollars collected could
be used for something else if there was no infrastructure plan. For example,
people could buy other goods and services, providing employment for other
people. That is why public infrastructure only shifts jobs from one task to
another. It does not create them out of thin air.
The
second argument in favor of the Buy American program has to do with national
security. In purchasing foreign goods, the U.S. allegedly “depends” on other
countries. What would happen, the argument implies, if those countries declared
war against America? Here again, Bastiat illuminates how misleading this
argument is. He remarks that “commercial” dependence is mutual. The U.S.
depends on foreigners as much as foreigners depend on the U.S.
Isolating
the U.S. with the Buy American program because of an expectation of war
actually increases the chances of war. Counterintuitively, cutting commercial
ties makes it easier for another country to declare war, since now it would
have less to lose. If two countries have strong commercial relations, they
would each lose much money by starting a war, as trade between them would end.
It’s
also the case that trade with American friends and allies helps strengthen
those ties, should conflict arise in the future. It’s one thing to preclude
trade with sworn enemies, such as Iran. It’s another to preclude trade with
Canada, Mexico, South Korea, Japan, the U.K., Germany, and India. By excluding
every other country on earth, “Buy American” rules even make relations with
friendly countries more difficult than they need to be.
Finally,
it could be true that the U.S. needs an overhaul of its roads, railroads,
airports, and so on. That could make the U.S. economy more efficient and reduce
costs. However, government-funded infrastructure is not the only way to
accomplish this goal. Bastiat’s suggestion? Reduce tariffs.
Inefficient
ports and clogged highways do make it more expensive to transport goods from
abroad. But every day, tariffs increase those same costs, purely through
government action. In other words, public infrastructure spending will attempt
to reduce part of the costs of goods and services that are already higher than
they should be due to the government’s tariffs. Cutting the tariffs would
reduce costs right away, with no need for years-long government construction
projects.
It is a
delusion to believe that the Buy American program is needed to create jobs,
increase national security, and make the U.S. economy more efficient. Jobs will
not be created, only diverted. Cutting commercial ties will increase the
chances of war and introduce obstacles to American alliances. Instead, we
should encourage lowering or eliminating tariffs which would improve the U.S.
economy and avoid wasting billions of taxpayer dollars. Politicians are
deceiving people with the usefulness of the Buy American program. As the great
Bastiat wrote, “To be fooled by others is already not very pleasant, but to use
the huge system of representation in order to fool yourself is to fool yourself
twice.”
No comments:
Post a Comment