By Noah Rothman
Thursday, November 04, 2021
There is no consensus around the extent to which a
backlash against the left’s all-consuming fixation with racial power dynamics
in America contributed to Democratic defeats at the polls on Tuesday. Some
believe it mattered quite a bit. Anti-critical race theory messaging featured
prominently in many Republican candidates’ stump speeches, and hostility toward
race-conscious curricula in schools mobilized the parental vote. Others think
it played a supporting role while pocketbook issues, such as the rising cost of
consumer goods, and the seeming permanence of the pandemic were more relevant
to most voters. Who knows?
If Democrats aren’t careful, however, they might
retroactively condition the public to believe that race
featured most prominently in the 2021 elections. In their efforts to salve the
wounds voters meted out on Tuesday, progressives are busily branding these
election results a manifestation of America’s latent racism. In the process,
they’re writing a narrative about this election cycle that will only reinforce
their psychological alienation from the voting public and accelerate the
Democratic Party’s retreat into the wilderness.
Why did Glenn Youngkin win the governorship of Virginia?
To hear the New York Times tell it, the Republican owes his
victory to many factors. The more legitimate among them, the story goes, are
overshadowed by nefarious efforts to balkanize the electorate. He “appealed to
Asian parents” who fear that progressive efforts to reduce the Asian-American
talent pool in colleges and advanced placement programs will rob their children
of opportunities. He reached out to “Black parents upset over the opposition of
teachers’ unions to charter schools.” He even released an ad featuring
Republican parents who were critical of a decision to assign Toni Morrison’s
difficult novel Beloved to high-school students—a “coded racist message,” according to Democrats.
All this, we’re told, is baseless fear-mongering.
“Critical race theory isn’t being taught,” said Color of Change president
Rashad Robinson. The backlash against the racialized curriculum that swept into
prominence with dizzying speed in the wake of George Floyd’s murder is “about
banning Black history.”
This self-soothing narrative has caught on in center-left media. Glenn Youngkin “did stoke white
grievance politics to mobilize the Republican base,” according to MSNBC host
Chris Hayes. His colleague, Joy Reid, deemed the Republican narrative around
education “code for white parents [who] don’t like the idea of teaching about
race.” The nearly universal assessment among those on the left is that critical
race theory isn’t being taught in schools. It is a “manufactured bogeyman” and
“the latest incarnation of the Southern Strategy,” via the Daily Beast’s Wajahat Ali. Any mention of it or its tenets is “dog
whistle” signaling to racist whites, who are anxious over losing their cultural
power to rising demographics. Youngkin’s goal, per Ja’Han Jones, is to “stigmatize any discussion of American
racism.”
This is a truly confusing message, as you might expect of
a fabricated narrative that is designed only to muscle scared Democrats into
ignoring the lessons voters taught them on Tuesday night. The idea that the
grab-bag of quasi-academic theories we now refer to as critical race theory
isn’t a prominent feature of modern pedagogy is an idea that challenges
parents’ experience. Young children are being divided by race in the classroom. They are being
taught the principles of intersectionality, which convey to children that the
accidents of their birth set them on what is in many ways a predestined path in
life. Many who support this initiative have defended it from critics in a
highly visible way, and the issue has organically driven
local elections for months preceding Tuesday’s contests. Telling
parents that they should not believe their own eyes is insulting.
If there is a parents’ revolt afoot, it is also the
opposite of a racist backlash. When parents object to ongoing efforts to
artificially circumscribe Asian students’ potential by eliminating
standardized testing and advanced-placement programs or by
imposing racial
quotas on selective schools specifically to keep the wrong races out,
those parents aren’t standing in a schoolhouse door. They’re doing their best
to keep those doorways open. When parents resent the classification of
elementary school children by their “power and privilege” and their place within an “oppression matrix,” they’re insisting that their child must
not be defined by the color of her skin. When parents refuse to allow their
children to internalize the notion that “urgency, deadlines, and time management” are racist
concepts that shouldn’t be applied to minorities, they are defending the
egalitarian ideals that still draw the oppressed peoples of the world to
American shores.
In their convalescence, the left is convincing itself that
everyone who doesn’t agree that critical race theory is an apparition and,
also, that its tenets must be applied at every level of education is a racist.
Judging from Tuesday’s results and the
country’s uniform swing away from Democratic candidates and issues, that’s
a whole lot of racists. The alternative to that message, one that centers on
colorblindness and equal access to opportunity, will be left to Republicans.
And judging by the incremental but observable
shift in the minority
vote away from Democratic candidates over the last 18
months, the audience for that message is only growing.
No comments:
Post a Comment