By Jim Geraghty
Monday, November
15, 2021
In an in-depth
report published yesterday, CNN describes
Kamala Harris’s time as vice president so far as marked by “entrenched
dysfunction and a lack of focus,” and reports that Harris and her “frantic”
supporters feel she’s been “sidelined,” “constrained,” “struggling with a rocky
relationship,” “abandoned,” “annoyed,” and “hobbled,” and that “her staff
failed her.”
But other than that, things are going
swimmingly!
Five things to keep in mind based off
CNN’s deep dive:
One: Most of Kamala Harris’s Senate and campaign staffers aren’t
with her in the vice presidency.
Harris’s domestic-policy adviser, Rohini
Kosoglu, is one of the few exceptions, but beyond that, the vice president is
surrounded by newcomers and outsiders.
Harris’s chief of staff, Hartina Flournoy,
was previously chief of staff to former president Bill Clinton until joining
Harris in December 2020. Harris’s deputy chief of staff, Michael Fuchs,
was a senior
fellow at the Center for American Progress and a foreign-policy adviser to
Clinton before joining Harris in January.
Harris’s chief spokesperson, Symone Sanders, was press secretary for Bernie Sanders
in 2016 and switched over to Biden’s team in April 2019. Harris’s communications director, Ashley Etienne, was Nancy Pelosi’s
communications director and
senior adviser until she joined the Biden campaign in August 2020. Harris’s
national-security adviser, Nancy McEldowney, is a career
foreign-service official.
This means a whole bunch of former Kamala
Harris Senate and campaign staffers are on the outside looking in, probably
believing they should have been picked for the vice
president’s top staff, and are eager to talk to CNN, Politico, and other Washington publications about what a terrible job the folks
who did get hired are doing. When you hear an unnamed staffer lamenting that
the current Harris staffers aren’t supporting the vice president the right way,
there’s a good chance the subtext is, “They should have hired me for the job
instead of that idiot.”
Two: There is always at least a little tension between the interests
of the president and the interests of the vice president, but the circumstances
of this presidency are tailor-made to exacerbate those normal tensions.
The president wants to look good in the
here and now, and with the current
polling for Biden and Democrats looking abysmal, the president and his team desperately need ways to make the guy at
the top look good and to ensure he gets the most credit. But the vice
president’s staff is traditionally focused on the longer-term picture, setting
the veep up for a successful presidential campaign launch.
These tensions between these two
aims are usually minor, at least up until the last two years of a
president’s second term. But with Biden turning 79 on Saturday, and increasingly
open questions about his memory and mental acuity, he is effectively a lame duck already.
Throw in Biden staffers
and allies who had a hard time forgiving Harris’s debate attacks, and the fact that Biden didn’t
know Harris well before selecting her as his running mate, and you have a formula for discord.
Three: Harris can break ties in the Senate, but she doesn’t have the influence
to help with close votes.
Harris was sworn in as a senator on
January 3, 2017, and announced she was running for president on January 21,
2019. A senator who’s running for president spends a lot of time in Iowa and
New Hampshire and in fundraising events across the country — not on Capitol
Hill attending hearings and markups and building relationships with peers.
(Harris missed a lot
of votes in the 2020 cycle — even more than
other senators running for president.) A person who serves in the Senate for just two years before running
for president just isn’t going to have the relationships on Capitol Hill that a
long-time senator such as Biden does.
Anyone with eyes can see that with the
U.S. Senate split 50–50, what the Democrats can pass depends entirely upon what
West Virginia senator Joe Manchin wants to pass — and to a certain extent,
Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona. In January, Harris made one early attempt to
pressure Manchin by doing an
interview with a West Virginia television station, but it backfired horribly:
The
interview even took U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., by surprise. Friday
morning, Manchin visited one of West Virginia’s COVID-19 vaccination clinics.
His visit comes just one day after the vice president spoke with WSAZ’s Amanda
Barren about the proposed “American Rescue Plan” (ARP).
“I saw
[the interview], I couldn’t believe it. No one called me [about it],” Manchin
said. “We’re going to try to find a bipartisan pathway forward, but we need to
work together. That’s not a way of working together.”
During a
press briefing at the White House, Press Secretary Jen Psaki answered questions
around a number of topics, including the vice president’s appearance on two
local television stations Thursday.
Put another way: Think of the political
culture of San Francisco (where Harris was twice elected district attorney) and
California as a whole and think of the political culture of West Virginia. The
traits and style needed to thrive in California’s very liberal,
interest-group-dominated Democratic Party are not the ones that will take you
far in culturally conservative, coal-mining West Virginia politics.
Four: What is Harris good at?
Think of this as a version of Charlie
Cooke’s Joe Biden challenge.
Put aside for a moment the fact that if
you’re reading this newsletter, there’s a good chance you disagree with Harris
on just about everything. Harris’s campaign
imploding before the first contest is a sign that she’s not naturally politically gifted, and the
fact that she’s a woman, an African American, and an Indian American doesn’t
mean she automatically wins the support of women, African Americans, or Indian
Americans. And as mentioned above, Harris doesn’t really have particularly
strong or long-standing relationships on Capitol Hill.
Harris has limited experience in foreign
policy; note that her staff was idiotic enough to cooperate with a late
February Politico article entitled, “Harris gets a crash course on foreign policy” that declared, “But
after a political career focused on domestic issues, particularly law
enforcement, it’s going to take some time to get her up to speed. Compared to
the current occupant of the Oval Office, Harris comes to the vice president’s
job as a neophyte on foreign policy.”
To the extent that Harris has strengths,
they comes from her prosecutorial experience — law, criminal justice, and the
judiciary. The administration job she would have most naturally fit was
attorney general. Alas, with Merrick Garland — the guy who prosecuted or
oversaw the prosecutions of the Oklahoma City bombing, the Unabomber, and the
1996 Olympics bombing — running the Department of Justice, there’s probably no
pressing need for another prosecutorial mind in the administration.
Five: What does Kamala Harris actually want to do?
One of the more intriguing sections of
CNN’s report is this:
As CNN has
previously reported, Harris herself has said she didn’t want
to be assigned to manage the border, aware that it was a no-win political
situation that would only sandbag her in the future. But Biden’s team was
annoyed that Harris fumbled answers about the border, including when she gave
an awkward, laughing response about not visiting it during a spring interview
with NBC’s Lester Holt.
Harris’s presidential campaign ran into
trouble in part because of flip-flopping on big issues — abolishing
ICE, sanctuary cities, Medicare for
All, independent
probes of police shootings, banning
fracking. Flip-flopping on issues is ultimately a
reflection of a political leader who isn’t entirely certain what he or she
wants. Aspiring political leaders want to accomplish big and consequential
things and to be remembered as bold and willing to make the difficult but
correct choices. Aspiring political leaders also want to be popular. These two
objectives are often in conflict. Doing the right thing usually involves some
amount of sacrifice or short-term pain for long-term gain, and that is rarely
popular.
If Harris genuinely thought she couldn’t
do anything useful on border issues, she should have bluntly and directly told
Biden, perhaps privately. (Maybe she did!) If she did, and Biden assigned her
the task anyway, credit her for being a good soldier, saluting, and doing the
dirty work that Biden didn’t want to do.
But if Harris feels as if her time as vice
president has been this unfocused mess, perhaps the place to start turning her
tenure around is by clarifying what she herself wants to accomplish in the job.
No comments:
Post a Comment