By Nate Hochman
Thursday, November 11, 2021
Things look increasingly dire for the prosecution in the Kyle Rittenhouse case,
and as the uphill battle to conviction grows steeper by the day, left-leaning
outlets such as the Washington Post have suddenly
discovered that the judge’s defense-friendly record on the bench is worthy of
scrutiny. That’s the title of yesterday’s Post piece: “As Kyle Rittenhouse trial nears end, judge’s decisions from the
bench come under scrutiny.”
This is a master class in how media bias works. The source of
said scrutiny — ostensibly the entire basis for the story — is primarily
the Post itself. This is common practice in the mainstream
media: Rather than reporting on organically occurring stories of interest,
journalists will decide that they want a story
to exist, and work backwards from there. The Post story began with
a preexisting conclusion — that Bruce Schroeder, the judge who may well rule
leniently in the Rittenhouse case, has a record of leniency that is deserving
of scrutiny — rather than reaching it as the result of serious, good-faith
investigation.
This is often referred to as the “raises questions”
blueprint: A reporter will personally decide he or she wants to raise questions
about a particular issue, and then proceed to write a story about how said
issue “raises questions.” In the Post’s Rittenhouse story, this
looked like the reporter combing through Schroeder’s judicial record, deciding
that it was suspiciously sympathetic to defendants, and then proceeding to
gesture toward the idea that this suspicion is somehow a widespread
sentiment. (“In the home stretch of a nearly four-decade career on the
bench, Schroeder’s sometimes unorthodox rules are now receiving nationwide
scrutiny.”)
But there wasn’t some grassroots surge in scrutiny of Schroeder’s
record; the Post decided it wanted to write a story saying
there was, and went out to ask leading questions accordingly. It is remarkably
easy to manufacture narratives this way. Conservatives often complain about
left-wing bias in terms of the slanted way that particular stories are
reported, and rightly so. But the more fundamental manifestation of media bias
can be seen in which stories reporters choose to write in the first
place — and which ones they don’t.
No comments:
Post a Comment