By Andrew C. McCarthy
Tuesday, November 23, 2021
Progressive prosecutors always have the courage of
their convictions as long as they’re just gasbagging about their lofty
aspirations for society . . . which is to say, right up until their
abstractions about “equity,” “systemic racism,” and the need to “reform” our
“broken system” crash into the reality of violent, recidivist crime that
destroys the lives of flesh-and-blood Americans.
At that point, it’s always some underling’s fault — some
nameless bureaucrat who didn’t get the subtle, oh-so-thoughtful nuances of the
boss’s position.
I mean, how could subordinate prosecutors in the office
of Milwaukee district attorney John Chisolm have possibly thought that when,
for years, he donned the mantle of self-styled progressive crusader against
cash bail and in favor of diverting criminals away from incarceration, he meant
that criminals should be given low bail to keep them out of jail?
Maybe it was because Chisolm proudly said so himself?
In 2007, when he was elected DA, Chisolm told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that
it was inevitable — “guaranteed” — that some criminal who had
avoided being detained due to Chisolm’s, er, enforcement philosophy would use
that opportunity to go out and commit murder, but that even such a horrific
crime would not make him reconsider his approach. As he put it:
Is there going to be an individual
I divert, or I put into treatment program, who’s going to go out and kill
somebody? You bet. Guaranteed. It’s guaranteed to happen. It does not
invalidate the overall approach.
So thoughtful! So compassionate! So . . . recklessly irresponsible.
Naturally, now that the policies he’s spent his career
championing have apparently enabled a violent career criminal, Darrell Brooks
Jr., to murder five people and injure dozens of others in an unspeakably
horrific mass-casualty attack on Sunday in Waukesha, Chisolm is singing a
different tune.
Suddenly, he has decided that the paltry $1,000 bail
to which his office agreed three weeks ago when Brooks allegedly assaulted
the mother of one of his children — including running a car over her leg in a
gas-station parking lot — was too low, after all.
Chisolm can’t imagine how that happened, especially given
that Brooks had a long criminal record of violent offenses, was already on bail
in Milwaukee in connection with violent crime and firearms offenses (on which
Chisolm’s office had agreed to drastically reduced bail when it failed to
timely bring the case to trial), and was also the subject of a pending
Nevada warrant arising out of his failure to comply with sex-offender
provisions. (Yup, Brooks is a sex-offender, too — and the warrant was pending
on both occasions when Chisolm’s office recently released him on low bail.)
So now Chisolm says Brooks’s latest bail was
“inappropriately low,” and he’ll be conducting an internal investigation into
why his office would agree to such a thing. Don’t you feel better now?
I wonder what the internal investigation will find. It
couldn’t possibly be that agreeing to low-bail or no-bail arrangements is
exactly what junior prosecutors understood the boss expected, right? The boss
who has argued that cash bail “criminalizes poverty.” The boss who brags that,
when other progressive prosecutors across the country implement non-enforcement
policies, they are following the trail he blazed.
This is how it always goes. When it’s the political
season for progressives, there are no criminals. There is just a “system” that
is inherently racist — notwithstanding the prominence of progressives at the
helm of that system for a century. Since it is society, not the offender, who
is to blame, then obviously we must reject such measures as requiring bail to
be posted (to protect the society and encourage compliance with its court
procedures) and mandating that convicted criminals be incarcerated (again, to
protect the society).
Then, we’re supposed to look the other way when, as
predictably as the morning sun, something like the Waukesha massacre is carried
out by a violent career criminal who is at liberty to prey on the community
solely because of a preening progressive prosecutor.
At that point, the fearless, truth-telling reformer tells
you that five innocent people were murdered in cold blood at a holiday
celebration because of an unfortunate bureaucratic snafu. “It does not
invalidate the overall approach.”
No comments:
Post a Comment