By Michael Brendan Dougherty
Friday, November 19, 2021
Dr. Anthony Fauci sometimes changes the numbers on us, doesn’t he? You may
remember when he shifted his prediction for when the U.S. would reach herd
immunity to COVID-19. Was it new evidence about the disease? No — of
course not. “When polls said only about half of all Americans would take a
vaccine, I was saying herd immunity would take 70 to 75 percent,” Fauci
said. “Then, when newer surveys said 60 percent or more would take it, I
thought, ‘I can nudge this up a bit,’ so I went to 80, 85.” He actually
had told the New York Times possibly as much as 90 percent
vaccination was required.
This week we had another shift. Back in March of this
year, Fauci told CNN that the U.S. shouldn’t ease restrictions to prevent
COVID-19 until the number of new coronavirus cases falls below 10,000 daily. We
got very close to this number in the early summer months before the Delta wave
hit. Last week the U.S. reported a daily average of nearly 83,500 new COVID
cases. Fauci said that COVID cases may need to fall to 3,300 per day to enable
a return to what he called “a degree of normality.”
To put that number in perspective, Ireland had 5,483 new
infections reported last Friday, and 89.1 percent of Irish people over the age
of twelve have been vaccinated. Ireland has a total population comparable to
Alabama’s, just under 5 million. If a nation of 5 million, with that high rate
of vaccination, can’t stay under 5,000 new cases a day, what hope does the U.S.
have with a population over 330 million?
Or let’s put it another way. Assume that COVID is now
endemic — and we will be facing it every year like the common cold and the flu.
In a normal year, we experience tens of thousands of symptomatic flu cases per
day during flu season. In other words, for the foreseeable future and for as
long as we continue to test aggressively for COVID-19, we will still be short
of Dr. Fauci’s terms for “a degree of normality.”
Oh, and let’s not let that phrase go without comment. Is
that really all that’s on the table? A degree of normality?
Vaccines have already come to market, and the U.S. has
just gone through its fastest uptake of a vaccine in history. We are, if
reports are to be believed, shortly going to be sold a new therapeutic drug
that does wonders for COVID patients, reportedly stopping them from developing
a serious or life-threatening illness when they contract the virus.
In the face of that reality, and the reality that the
strains on hospital systems are becoming much more the normal strains that we
lived with for decades previously, what possible reason could there be for
talking about mere “degrees of normality”? By the definition of public health
as it existed 18 months ago, the current situation looks like a phenomenal
triumph and victory.
But yet, we are nowhere near getting a declaration of
victory by public-health officials. Instead they are fooling themselves into
more winter lockdowns, longer durations of masks, and impositions such as
social distancing. Politicians in Europe are increasingly engaged in an attempt
at scapegoating the remaining unvaccinated for policies that politicians
imposed.
COVID is endemic. We have the best pharmaceutical tools
we’re going to get. And health-care systems have learned a great deal about how
to treat COVID patients effectively. The virus itself is evolving, just as
expected — to be more transmissible but less deadly.
A degree of realism means ending any mitigation effort we
don’t want to carry on in perpetuity.
No comments:
Post a Comment