By J. J. McCullough
Monday, April 30, 2018
Watching the Sean Hannity show the other day, I heard
four giddy words I can’t say I expected: “Up next, Piers Morgan!” Only a few
days prior, after all, Morgan had been involved in one of his trademark Twitter
spats — with Hannity mainstay Sebastian Gorka, no less — and it had ended with
Morgan declaring America’s contribution to World War II overrated and
unhelpful.
“Where would Britain be without you & your massive
GUNS?!” Morgan had snippily tweeted at an American. “Speaking German,” replied
Ben Shapiro, retweeted by Gorka. Morgan’s comeback? “It was really good of
America to join WW2 two years later, after millions had died. Many thanks.”
That tasteful comment did not come up during the Hannity
interview, which was instead a chummy exchange of shared disgust at the Mueller
investigation, James Comey, and the latest dumb thing Joy Behar had said.
Morgan would have made a curious guest for a conservative
talk show even without his recent foray into historical revisionism. To the
extent he’s made any political brand for himself in America, it’s been as a
hectoring anti-gun fanatic and generally condescending anti-American scold. Yet
because Morgan has had some mildly sympathetic things to say about Donald Trump
as of late (or at least hates some of the same people as the president) all is
forgiven, and he’s now understood as “one of us” to some corners of the
conservative base.
It was the same phenomenon that saw Kanye West’s
remarkable rebranding last week. A tweet or two in the president’s favor and
the man previously best known for calling George W. Bush a racist sociopath on
live television and contributing such immortal lines to the canon of American
music as “eatin’ Asian p***y / all I need was sweet and sour sauce” was reborn
as a conservative folk hero. Perhaps West was taking his cue from Roseanne
Barr, whom many on the right have given a similar mulligan for decades of
far-left lunacy on the grounds she kinda likes Trump.
Conservatives are at their worst when they obsessively
internalize leftist critiques, and no criticism has proven a greater font of
conservative insecurity than liberal teasing that the Right is crotchety,
backwards, and unhip. Much anxious effort has been exerted to prove these
critics wrong, yet desperation rarely produces flattering results. The hurried
search for conservatives with some progressive cachet — black, gay, famous,
young, etc. — often manifests as low standards and embarrassing self-delusion,
as the intellectual talents of various B-rate minds are inflated to heroic
status the moment their public rhetoric drifts even the teensiest bit
rightward.
It’s even worse than usual these days, given the very
definition of “rightward” has become hazier than ever amid the rise of a fairly
unideological Republican president and an increasingly visible fanatic
far-left.
Since Trump plays his partisan role awkwardly, and is on
the receiving end of a hysteria that often has little to do with politics, the
president can come off a sympathetic figure, even if — perhaps especially if — one’s understanding of
politics is fairly shallow. People who imagine themselves to be outspoken or
uncouth outsiders with stylistic similarities to Trump can easily empathize
with him, regardless of their policy opinions. This makes Trump a celebrity
president who is often judged on celebrity terms, where arguments like “I just
can’t stand him!” or “show those
haters!” are considered sufficiently full opinions.
Meanwhile, the cultural crusades of the far left have
become more conspicuous than ever through endless media coverage of language
and thought policing at college campuses, newsrooms, and elsewhere. Again,
regardless of the politics involved, this sort of thing is quite easy to engage
with at a cultural level alone. Americans don’t like being told what to do or
what to say, and there will always be a great deal of contempt leveled at
anyone who affects the personality of a scold or busybody — and support for
those who resist.
Conservatives can claim some degree of common cause with
anyone who feels Trump is being given a hard time and thinks the colleges are
going nuts, but this isn’t much. Identifying political allies exclusively on
such thin criteria will invariably require turning a blind eye to all sorts of
other deranged opinions, and redefining conservatism into a temperament of
shallow irritation with some characteristics of American political culture
circa 2018, as opposed to anything resembling a timeless or coherent
philosophy.
An obsession with building up superficially cool but
intellectually preposterous right-wing celebrities has already led to disasters
such as Milo Yiannopoulos, and one can’t help but feel a grim sense of déjà vu
as an ever-growing parade of semi-coherent supposed conservatives from
Hollywood, pop music, and YouTube are hyped by conservative media outlets
desperate for validation by young, hip audiences.
That said, critics do run the risk of snobbery.
Conservatives have to be open to newcomers, and ideological newbies —
particularly those who were on the left until five minutes ago — will
inevitably spout opinions that are one-dimensional, badly articulated, or
half-formed.
The key is sizing up the motive animating the alleged new
right-wing personality. Does the rhetoric of the nouveau-conservative appear to
be coming from a place of genuine political interest? Do his opinions reflect a
desire to engage in arguments beyond the present moment? Or has he simply
discovered a new way to get in front of the cameras and exploit the wishful
thinking of a uniquely desperate audience?
No comments:
Post a Comment