By Jonah Goldberg
Friday, August 25, 2017
The virus seems to be approaching its breakout phase. We
could be looking at a full-scale epidemic here.
Zika? Ebola? Flu?
Nope. We don’t have a great word for this sickness yet.
“Iconoclasm” — i.e., the destruction of images and monuments that offend this
mob or that — comes close, but the toppling of statues is just one acute
symptom of the fever.
Indeed, the fight over Confederate statues is just a
discrete and more understandable eruption of the larger trend. This stuff has
been happening for decades. One of the first outbreaks involved the word
“crusader.” The term hurt the feelings of people who didn’t know what they didn’t
know. Left-wing historians (and the Islamists who love them) convinced
themselves that the Crusades were a trial run of Western imperialism and
colonialism. They were, in fact, largely defensive wars intended to beat back
the aggression of Muslim colonizers. Even the organization Campus Crusade for
Christ changed its name to “Cru” lest people get the wrong impression.
Sports teams — most famously the Washington, D.C., NFL
Franchise That Dare Not Speak Its Name — have been under increasing pressure to
drop any association with Native Americans. Columbus Day is outré. And statues
of Christopher Columbus may be heading to the pyre, if recent developments in
New York City are any indication.
My National Review
colleague Kyle Smith reports that Mayor Bill de Blasio has ordered a 90-day
review of “all statues and monuments that in any way may suggest hate or
division or racism, anti-Semitism — any kind of message that is against the
values of New York City.” Translation: De Blasio wants a carefully composed
list of stuff to tear down.
Orderliness is the one concession de Blasio’s brand of
progressivism demands of the mob.
But fear not, de Blasio has made it clear that the iconic
statue of Christopher Columbus in New York’s Columbus Circle is “obviously . .
. one of the ones that will get very immediate attention because of the
tremendous concerns about it.” What’s next, Smith wonders — Columbia
University? The District of Columbia?
In New York, the drive to purge Columbus from the
historical memory (save as a pioneer of imperialism, racism, and genocide) is
gaining newfound momentum.
“There obviously has been ongoing dialogue and debate in
the Caribbean — particularly in Puerto Rico, where I’m from — about this same
conversation that there should be no monument or statue of Christopher Columbus
based on what he signifies to the native population . . . [the] oppression and
everything that he brought with him,” Melissa Mark-Viverito, the speaker of the
New York City Council, said this week.
I wonder what Colombians think about all this.
What fascinates me about this civilizational auto-immune
disorder is how superficial it is. Mark-Viverito is from Puerto Rico. More than
95 percent of the people there speak Spanish. The dominant religion of Puerto
Rico is Catholicism (85 percent). As far as I can tell, Mark-Viverito, who is
of mixed European ancestry (her mother, Elizabeth Viverito, was of Italian
descent and a prominent Puerto Rican feminist; her father, Anthony Mark, was a
prominent doctor), does not speak Taino, the native language of the Arawak
tribes who inhabited Puerto Rico when Columbus arrived. Rather, she speaks the
languages of her alleged oppressors — Spanish and, of course, English. She even
attended Columbia University. I could find no mention on the Internet that she
has burned her diploma in protest.
My point is not that the world ushered in by Christopher
Columbus has been very good to Mark-Viverito, though it obviously has. It is that
toppling some statues or even incanting some nonsense about “cultural
appropriation” cannot separate the iconoclasts from the culture they live in.
The mobs of students — and their enabling professors and administrators —
renaming buildings and bowdlerizing the language are still products of Western
civilization. Even the poseurs who think Googling a few phrases from Karl Marx
and wearing a Che Guevara T-shirt make them anti-colonialists are disciples of
Western thinkers. Where does Mark-Viverito think her mother’s feminism came
from? The Arawaks?
For centuries, to the extent that educated Muslims talked
about the Crusades at all, it was to boast about how they emerged victorious
from them. But Osama bin Laden and his ilk read too much Noam Chomsky and
caught the Western disease of victimization and resentment.
That is the plague sweeping the land now. And tearing
down some statues and renaming some streets isn’t a cure, it’s a symptom.
No comments:
Post a Comment