By Ben Shapiro
Wednesday, August 09, 2017
Hillary Clinton wants to talk to you about God.
According to The
Atlantic, the once-sure-thing White House candidate is back on the campaign
trail, this time on behalf of Jesus. Hillary, they say, spent years holding
back her faith from public view; she avoided imposing the joy of Christ on the
assembled. But secretly, she and God were on solid terms. Never mind the public
spectacle of her explaining to religious Americans that their “deep seated
cultural codes, religious beliefs, and structural biases have to be changed.”
This was a woman hiding her light under a bushel.
No longer.
The Atlantic
explains:
Clinton brought her faith with her
as she entered political life, in times both good and bad. . . . Clinton might
argue that her politics were the ultimate expression of her faith.
This isn’t atypical language for top-shelf Democrats.
President Obama, another man who scorned religious Americans as Bible-thumping
rubes, used to regularly quote Matthew 25:40: “The King will reply, ‘Truly I
tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters
of mine, you did for me.’” Obama cited this passage as justification for
government intervention rather than as support for evangelism, the more
traditional reading.
Leftist politicians aren’t shy about sharing their faith.
But they seem puzzled that so few religious Americans seem to take their faith
seriously.
Perhaps that’s because religious Americans look at the
invocation of the Bible by the political Left as a bit of political
appropriation. Leftists seem to rely on the Bible only when calling for
precisely the reverse of the personal-responsibility ethos promulgated by the
Bible.
A recent poll from the Washington Post and Kaiser Family Foundation found that a plurality
of Christians, 46 percent, said that lack of effort was tied to poverty; just
29 percent of non-Christians felt that way. Among white Evangelicals, that
number was 53 percent, with only 41 percent blaming circumstances for poverty.
That’s a traditionally religious viewpoint: Free will, imbued in us by a just
and benevolent God, enables us to make decisions for which we should be held
responsible.
That doesn’t mean that charity should go by the wayside,
but it does mean that in a free society, blame for individual circumstance
should first fall on the decision-maker, and only then should we look to
society as the cause of suffering. Political leftism suggests precisely the
reverse, favoring social-justice engineering over individual self-betterment.
Religious Americans also look askance at the willingness
of the pseudo-religious Left to ignore or denigrate sections of the Bible that
run counter to their favored social policies. The same leftists who
high-handedly quote Matthew to support redistributionism will ignore Matthew on
marriage (19:4–6). They’ll scoff at religious Americans who simply wish to
operate their businesses or raise their children in accordance with Biblical
values. They’ll even call for the power of government to trump individual adherence
to the Bible.
Hillary herself opposed every version of the Religious
Freedom Restoration Act; supported the Human Rights Campaign, which wishes to
use federal law to crack down on businesses to “discriminate” on the basis of
“sexual orientation” and gender identity”; and opposed the Hobby Lobby Supreme Court decision, which allowed religiously owned
businesses to avoid promoting abortion.
Yet the Left remains confused about why religious
Americans wouldn’t trust Pastor Hillary. Hillary would “make a great pastor,”
says her former pastor, Bill Shillady, adding that she probably won’t go to
seminary. “I think it would be more of . . . guest preaching at some point.”
We’ve heard Hillary’s preaching. It sounds exactly like
her political agenda, just with a bit of God-talk sprinkled on top. Leftism,
American-style, usually does. Leftists like to hijack religious-speak in order
to deliver their unpalatable statism in the guise of godliness. Their program
is a godless theocracy that worships centralized power, and they understand
that Americans are more likely to support such a theocracy with a false image
of the Divine Countenance at the center. But that doesn’t make leftist tent
revival any less of an Elmer Gantry scam.
After Hillary’s election defeat, Shillady concluded, “I
think her faith is stronger.”
Surely it is. After all, the faith of leftists lies not
in a God of personal responsibility but in a god of collective blame. And that
god has never left Hillary’s heart, not even for a second.
No comments:
Post a Comment