By John Daniel Davidson
Tuesday, August 08, 2017
It has become obvious in the era of Trump that mainstream
media organizations see themselves as defenders of freedom and decency against
the depredations of the White House — a plucky band of present-day Woodward and
Bernsteins holding the powerful to account, saving democracy from dying in
darkness.
It’s a convenient and flattering narrative, especially
after eight years watching the media more or less allow their own partisan
biases to dictate what’s newsworthy. It’s not always obvious to readers how
this works, but every now and then the veil slips and we find out what
reporters really think.
This week, for example, we have hundreds of Department of
Justice documents provided to conservative groups Judicial Watch and the
American Center for Law and Justice, which have filed lawsuits for records
related to a private meeting between then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and
former President Bill Clinton at a Phoenix airport last summer.
The documents reveal what many conservative observers
noted throughout the Obama administration: the media’s reluctance to cover
anything that might damage the president or the Democratic Party, to the point
of ignoring what would have been considered major scandals in a Republican
administration.
In this case, the DOJ documents show that reporters for The Washington Post, The New York Times, and ABC News didn’t
want to cover the meeting on the tarmac between Lynch and Clinton, although it
happened when Hillary Clinton was under a legal cloud. One reporter for the Times emailed a DOJ official to say he
was “pressed into service to write about the questions being raised” by the
meeting. A reporter for the Post
emailed that although his editors “are still pretty interested” in the story,
he wanted to “put it to rest.”
Emails Reveal
Reporters’ Shocking Lack Of Curiosity
Can you imagine these reporters wanting to put such a
story to rest if had been about Donald Trump or any other GOP leader? Me
neither. Recall that at the time the Lynch-Clinton meeting took place,
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was under federal
investigation for her use of a private email server while serving as Obama’s
secretary of State.
It’s not just that mainstream news outlets were reluctant
to cover the story after conservative news organizations began reporting on it.
They didn’t think twice about it when the subject first came up at a press
conference in Phoenix the day after the meeting. Look at the follow-up question
to Lynch’s dubious claim that she and Clinton only talked about their
grandkids, golf, and Janet Reno:
Are reporters really this credulous? The head of the
Justice Department had just held a secret meeting with the husband of the
presumptive Democratic nominee for president, who was under FBI investigation,
yet the most pressing follow-up question this reporter could come up with was a
softball about whether the Phoenix police were doing a good job?
Later, another hard-hitting reporter thanks Lynch for her
visit and simply asks if she is “encouraged by some of the things you saw
today.” No one brings up the meeting on the tarmac again or asks Lynch if she
felt it was inappropriate, coming just months before the presidential election
and mere weeks before Clinton’s nomination to be the Democratic candidate.
The Lynch-Clinton
Meeting Was A Big Story
Reporters are often skeptical of things Republicans say,
with good reason. But here we see them accepting at face value that Lynch just
happened to cross paths with her old friend Bill Clinton while his wife was
under investigation.
We now know that this was the meeting that prompted
former FBI director James Comey to speak publically about the email
investigation. He felt that the Justice Department had compromised its
credibility in the matter, as indeed it had. Comey said that was why he took
the unprecedented step of publicly announcing last July that the FBI had
concluded its investigation and, although Clinton had been reckless in her use
of a private email server, “no reasonable prosecutor” would bring a criminal
case against her.
We also know, based on Comey’s testimony before a Senate
committee in June, that Lynch had instructed him not to refer to the Clinton
email investigation as an investigation but to call it a “matter.” Comey
complied, but told senators that the request “concerned me because that
language tracked with how the [Clinton] campaign was talking about how the FBI
was doing its work.” He said it gave him a “queasy feeling” but concluded that,
“This isn’t a hill worth dying on, and so I just said, ‘Okay.’”
Now, Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee are
asking for an investigation of how the Clinton email scandal was handled,
including how Comey managed the case. Such an investigation is indeed warranted
because it’s probably the only way we’ll ever know what happened, especially
since the media is determined not to cover the story.
Media Routinely
Ignore Stories That Don’t Confirm Their Biases
We’ve seen this sort of thing before. The media not only
didn’t want to cover the Internal Revenue Service targeting scandal back in
2013, but it showed little interest in revelations last summer that the FBI
knew the IRS was targeting conservative groups applying for nonprofit status in
2011 — two years before Congress and the public learned of the agency’s
misconduct. Obama’s Justice Department simply sat on that information and chose
not to act.
After congressional hearings and a vote to censure IRS
official Lois Lerner, the head of the tax-exempt division at the heart of the
scandal, the Department of Justice announced in 2015 that the administration
would not bring charges against Lerner or anyone else, saying it found “no
evidence that any IRS official acted based on political, discriminatory,
corrupt or other inappropriate motive.” Throughout the scandal, the media
dismissed it as a “scam” and attempted to draw false equivalences to IRS
scrutiny of liberal groups.
More recently, we’ve heard almost nothing from national
news outlets about the case of Imran Awan, the congressional information
technology staffer arrested July 24 while attempting to board a flight to
Pakistan. Awan had been in the employ of Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, as well
as other top House Democrats. He was arrested on charges of bank fraud after
wiring $283,000 to Pakistan. Wasserman Schultz continued to employ Awan even
after police told her he was the target of a criminal investigation into
cybersecurity issues.
As a congressional IT staffer, Awan had access to emails
and files of dozens of members of Congress, as well as the password to the iPad
that Wasserman Schultz used for Democratic National Committee business before
she was forced to resign in July 2016. In March, Awan’s wife and children
abruptly left the country. She had $12,400 cash in her suitcase.
The media is not interested in any of this. As Kim
Strassel noted last week, the story was dismissed by The New York Times as an “overblown Washington story, typical of
midsummer.” Slate referred to it last week as a “conservative media story.”
A recent fawning profile of The New York Times and The
Washington Post in Vanity Fair
captures the media’s mood perfectly: Trump, being a kind of supervillain in the
mind of the news media, has supposedly made good old-fashioned shoe-leather
journalism great again. But as my colleague Mary Katharine Ham noted last week,
“In a business that’s supposed to be driven by the pursuit of knowledge, there
is a stunning scarcity of self-awareness.”
So don’t expect a mea
culpa from the Post or the Times over this latest batch of emails
showing their reporters’ laziness and bias. After all, as far as they’re
concerned the whole thing was a non-story. Lynch and Clinton were just two old
friends catching up on the tarmac, talking about their grandkids. Nothing to
see here, move along.
No comments:
Post a Comment