By Noah Weinrich
Wednesday, August 16, 2017
Note: This piece was originally published by
Acculturated.
Earlier this summer, I attended a two-week summer
philosophy course that included many students from Ivy League universities. It
didn’t take long for me to realize that although these students were brilliant,
they seemed to be receiving an education that was harming them.
I learned that Ivy League schools have lost sight of what
matters in education. Instead of focusing on truth, learning, and the higher
things in life, our elite colleges have turned into pressure cookers designed
to churn out the ideal professional. Instead of providing a challenging,
rigorous education, our higher institutions of learning are content to
indoctrinate their students before shipping them off to Silicon Valley or Wall
Street, diploma in hand, to make their millions. That’s not what college is
meant to be.
When our group of college seniors, which included students
from Cornell and Stanford Universities, among other elite colleges, visited the
National Gallery in Washington, D.C., this point was driven home. Viewing a
particular piece of art, I made an offhand comment about Plato’s cave. The two
students with me looked puzzled: “What’s Plato’s cave?”
Not everyone needs to know what Plato’s cave is, of
course, but I was stunned that two elite students, hand-picked for a summer
program that focused on philosophy,
had never heard of one of the foundational ideas of Western civilization. My
peers at Hillsdale College, a place not ranked among the nation’s elite
colleges, read portions of Plato’s Republic
during their freshman year, and even if they are not experts in philosophy,
they can at least recognize an allusion to Plato. If “elite” students don’t
understand history, philosophy, or literature, what are they learning?
Many of them are well versed in the contemporary
grievance industry and can speak fluently on politically correct subjects such
as “intersectionality.” Of course this is not universally true, but in the
absence of real core curricula at many elite colleges, much falls through the
gaping cracks.
By contrast, at many non–Ivy League liberal-arts
colleges, communities of learning are intact. Students take small classes, work
their way through a comprehensive core curriculum, and love learning and
challenging ideas. But at the Ivies, I get the impression from my peers that
accomplishments and skill and résumé-building often matter more than pursuing
truth and risking failure in the process.
This constant striving and fear of failure is a serious
issue. Mental-health challenges are a serious problem on college campuses —
last year Columbia University dealt with monthly suicides, and many of the
Ivies have been dealing with similar problems. Universities cannot be blamed
for suicides, of course, but as the parents of one dead teen asserted, their
son went off to college having “never experienced failure.” College is meant to
be a space for constant failure in the pursuit of something higher. When did
failure not become an option at our elite schools?
Another student at my summer program shook my faith in
the students of the Ivy League because of her weary cynicism about the future.
When I asked how she liked Harvard, she replied, “It’s alright, I guess. It’s
about the same as everywhere. It’s very career-focused. Everyone seems to just
go through so they can go into consulting.” When I asked her what she was
planning to do when she graduated, she replied, “Consulting.”
The facts bear her out. A few years ago, the New York Times reported the astonishing
rates at which Ivy League students graduate into work in the finance or
consulting sectors. In the year before the financial crash, a staggering 73
percent of Princeton graduates went into those two sectors, for example. That’s
not normal.
Those rates have declined slightly since then, but
they’re still high. Fifteen percent of Harvard grads go into consulting, but
only 0.5 percent want to be there a decade later. Why are they working in
fields they don’t even enjoy?
The fast-track to finance and consulting makes sense for
Ivy Leaguers, regardless of their major. For many of them, their lives have
been spent being groomed to pursue prestige (and wealth) with little risk. That
makes the two-year terms at McKinsey & Company and the like, with their
80-hour work weeks and large salaries, pretty appealing. Never mind that they
hate the field: It’s the next logical step, and elite colleges seem to punish
thinking outside the box.
Most of the top tier of our educational industry is just
that — an industry. Instead of creating an environment for learning, the top
eight schools in the nation have created a pipeline (largely filled with
children from upper-middle-class and very wealthy families) from private high
schools to Ivy League colleges and straight into powerful and well-paid
positions. While many liberal-arts schools around the country still focus on
art, philosophy, languages, and the formation of good human beings, the Ivy Leagues
seem mainly to be in the business of manufacturing cookie-cutter adults. The
Ivy Leagues may be “changing the world,” as they like to claim, but given the
evidence I saw this summer, it’s not in a good way.
No comments:
Post a Comment