By Victor Davis Hanson
Tuesday, December 22, 2015
Black Lives Matter and other, related groups are still
demanding that Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel step down well before his term
expires. It appears that Emanuel did not release for over a year a police video
showing the possibly unjustified shooting of criminal suspect Laquan McDonald.
He apparently was too afraid of losing his reelection bid to another liberal —
and expected that, as a former Obama confidant, he would be granted immunity
from inner-city anger.
Is liberal anger at the liberal Emanuel a new trend? Will
populists one of these days go after the newly declared populist Hillary
Clinton for her Wall Street shakedowns? Will greens cannibalize Al Gore and
John Kerry for their dinosaur-sized carbon footprints? Will reformers swallow
Barack Obama for his scandal-ridden administration?
In Baltimore, crowds of angry minorities rioted and
burned stores over the death of detained suspect Freddie Gray — despite the
reassurances of a black mayor, black police chief, and black prosecuting
attorney. Community anger at police is now a hallmark of nearly every major
American city.
Note that in all these cases the protests and riots were
directed at city hall and its assorted bureaucracies — run for generations by
liberal Democrats. There is not an easy villain, like Bull Connor or Lester
Maddox, to be found among current American officials. In both his elections,
Obama, for example, captured overwhelmingly the votes in megalopolises like
Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Washington, D.C. None of these cities in
recent years has elected moderate Republican reformers demanding greater
transparency, meritocratic hiring practices, lower taxes, less regulation, open
bids for municipal services, balanced budgets, and an end to union monopolies.
Instead, the liberal municipal template of generous
government pensions, lavish subsidies and welfare, unionized workforces,
identity politics, lots of regulations, and high taxes apparently has ensured
permanent underclasses of Democratic voters in the inner city. And for some
reason, they are now furious at Democratic city halls, the police, and city
administrators.
The same theme characterizes the current targets of
university protests — whether they are over supposedly endemic racism or
nonstop sexual assault. Quite liberal student activists are enraged at their
quite liberal professors and administrators for not being quite liberal enough.
Serve ethnic foods — and they are not ethnic enough.
Water down protections for free speech, and there are protests that there is
any free speech. Turn the curriculum into therapeutic gut courses — and why are
there not more of them? Ignore meritocratic criteria for admissions, and why
are not more students accepted on the basis of race or gender? Expand two
genders to three — and students furiously ask why not four, five, or six?
How can all this anger arise when there are almost no
conservative administrators or professors on most major American university
campuses? Has there been any liberal demand on campus that has gone unheeded in
the last half-century? Do activists hate even more those authorities who cave
in to them, as if unprincipled weakness is more contemptible than principled
resistance? It is almost as if students would prefer to be told no by John
Wayne than by Tom Hanks.
I remember that 45 years ago at UC Santa Cruz, students
demanded pass/fail grading — only soon to want back grades when their
transcripts proved indistinguishable and uncompetitive. When co-ed dorms were
not enough, co-ed floors followed — only to be followed by female anger at the
lack of privacy. When street people were idolized and offered immunity on
campus, rich students whined that the homeless were camped out in their lounges
and bathrooms. Finally, anarchists grew angry at the enablers of their own
anarchy. The point was not protests directed at particular people or policies,
but protests for the sake of protests without consequences.
The ancients warned us about radical egalitarianism
immune from law, custom, and tradition. Aristotle worried that those who were
equal in voting would soon demand that they be equal in all other respects as
well: Equality of opportunity, he warned, always begat the illogical demand for
equality of result. A more cynical Plato thought the logic of enforced equality
would not play itself out until the donkeys and dogs roamed the city as equals.
We are now in a classic downward revolutionary spiral. In
daily psychodramas, pampered students want statues toppled and hurtful names
airbrushed. First, they Trotskyize Confederate heroes. Then they go after
illiberal liberals like Woodrow Wilson. Will they next turn on often-callous
womanizers, such as Bill Clinton, JFK, and Martin Luther King Jr., who might
serve as models of how not to treat young women on campus? We know Harry Truman
and LBJ used the N-word; will their images and names vanish as well?
Students have turned micro-aggressions into
nano-aggressions. After raging at the living, why not dig up the long dead? If
there are rock-climbing walls and latte bars on campus, then why not safe
spaces? If one dean will grovel and welcome reeducation from uneducated
20-year-olds, why not the president, the board of trustees, and the alumni?
For the spirit of Black Lives Matter to thrive, the
movement must canonize the lie of “Hands up, don’t shoot”; ignore the daily
carnage of young African-Americans murdering each other with near impunity;
brush off the fact that young black males, who form a tiny percentage of the
population, account for nearly 50 percent of violent crime; deny that protests
have called for violence against police; and forget that blacks are eight times
more likely to commit interracial crimes than are whites.
Abroad, we see the same tired scenario. The European
Union did its best to end national sovereignty, to create a spread-the-wealth
socialist utopia, to disarm, and to glorify noble non-Europeans over the
politically incorrect Europeans. Now the continent is ablaze and ready to
cannibalize its own liberal kings. Millions ask why is there no border
security, why are there no jobs, why are we collectively defenseless, and why
do so many young males from the Middle East swarm our cities and yet show
contempt for their hosts? Is the reason for all this a half-century of rule by
oligarchic aristocrats, heartless free-market libertarians, right-wing
bureaucrats, or narrow national chauvinists?
Civil wars are often more virulent than other types of
conflict. The rage often originates from within. Familiarity breeds contempt
and excites age-old envies and jealousies amid claims of betrayal and sellout.
The West is ablaze with protests not just because of the failure of the Left in
the cities, on campuses, and across Europe to offer a workable paradigm, but
also because of the Left’s canonic assurances that it could and would.
Deans and mayors promised utopia. When it did not arrive,
the only concession they had left was more failed efforts to achieve the
unachievable. People turn on their own more violently than they turn on others,
as if a liberal, paternal dean should be able to snap his fingers and make
liberal students happy. When he so promises, his ensuing failure only makes
things worse.
All the banned micro-aggressions, all the safe spaces,
all the trigger warnings, and all the fired deans will not make today’s
postmodern students happy, much less appreciative, any more than would mandating
authentic ethnic cooks and more year-round hot-tubs. Like addicts, they believe
one more cheap fix from a compliant supplier will finally do the trick. Don’t
expect the addict to show gratitude to his dealer.
Leftist revolutionaries cannot be satisfied, because they
have long ago been given all they asked for, and are now rebelling for the idea
of rebelling against something, even if it is reduced to a micro-aggression or
founded on a myth like “Hands up, don’t shoot.” Millions of inner-city youths
are as furious as are elite students. They got the liberal city and the liberal
university they wanted — only to rage that human nature is not liberal and that
contentment cannot be found through mirror-image government, but only within
themselves. How can you rebel against that age-old truth?
No comments:
Post a Comment