By Andrew C. McCarthy
Saturday, December 26, 2015
Let me ask you a question.
Let’s say you are an authentically moderate Muslim.
Perhaps you were born into Islam but have become secularist. Or perhaps you
consider yourself a devout Muslim but interpret Islam in a way that rejects
violent jihad, rejects the concept that religious and civic life are
indivisible, and rejects the principle that sharia’s totalitarian societal
framework and legal code must be imposed on the state. Let’s just take that as
a given: You are no more inclined toward terrorism than any truly peaceful,
moderate, pro-democratic non-Muslim.
So let me pop the question: Is there any insulting thing
I could say, no matter how provocative, or any demeaning video I could show
you, no matter how lurid, that could convince you to join ISIS?
Mind you, I am not asking whether, upon my insulting and
provoking you, you would ever want to have anything to do with me again. I am
asking whether there is anything that could be said or done by me, or, say,
Donald Trump, or Nakoula Basseley Nakoula — the video producer (Innocence of Muslims) whom Hillary
Clinton and Barack Obama tried to blame for the Benghazi massacre — that could
persuade you to throw up your hands and join the jihad? Is there anything so
profoundly offensive to Islam that we could conjure up that would make a truly
moderate, peaceful Muslim sign up for mass murder? Torching and beheading?
Killing children? Participating in systematic rape as a weapon of war?
I didn’t think so.
Yet, understand, that is what Washington would have you
believe. Whether it is Barack Obama sputtering on about how Guantanamo Bay
drives jihadist recruitment, or Hillary Clinton obsessing over videos (the real
one by Nakoula that she pretended caused terrorism in Libya, and the pretend
ones about Donald Trump that she claims have Muslims lined up from Raqqa to
Ramadi to join ISIS), you are to believe violent jihad is not something that
Muslims do but that Americans incite.
And it’s not just Democrats who’d have you buy this
bunkum. Think of the Arab Spring fairy tale — about Libya, Egypt, and, most
recently, Syria — that Republicans have been telling for years, and critiqued
by yours truly in Spring Fever. It is
still GOP gospel, glibly peddled by Marco Rubio just a couple of weeks ago at
the 2016 presidential candidates’ debate. (Disclosure: I support Ted Cruz.)
The fairy tale goes something like this. There is a
terrible dictator who so tormented his people that they rose up against him.
These were noble people, overwhelmingly moderate, secular Muslims — adherents
of a “religion of peace” (or, as Bush secretary of state Condi Rice put it, “a
religion of peace and love”), who craved democracy. (Caution: You can call them “rebels,” but words like
“Muslim Brotherhood” and “sharia” are not to be uttered — we’re trying to build
a narrative here!) Sure, the noble people may have tolerated the occasional
jihadist in their midst, but that could happen to even the most
well-intentioned peaceful moderate, right? (The
pervasive presence of jihadists who used Syria and Libya as gateways to jihad
against Americans in Iraq is also not to be mentioned.)
Now let’s let bygones be bygones. No need to tarry over
small details — like how the noble people installed anti-democratic Islamists
who imposed a sharia constitution on Egypt after ousting their pro-American
dictator; or how Libya became a jihadist playpen where Americans are murdered
after the U.S. government sided with the noble people to oust the
U.S.-supported dictator who had been giving us counterterrorism intelligence
about jihadists in places like Benghazi.
Let’s just skip ahead to Syria. There, the noble people
needed America’s help, but Barack Obama turned a deaf ear. (No need to get into Obama’s collusion with
the Islamic-supremacist governments of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE to arm
and train the “rebels.”) This forfeited our golden opportunity to intervene
actively and empower the bounty of moderate, secular, America-loving,
democracy-craving Muslims (because that
worked so well in Libya). But for Obama’s default, these moderate legions
could simultaneously have toppled the dictator and purged the teeny-tiny number
of jihadists who might have been skulking about. (Let’s not get into how there don’t seem to be enough of these moderates
to man a soccer team, let alone a legion; or how weapons supplied to these
“rebels” somehow keep ending up in the hands of the jihadists.) Obama’s
default, coupled with the ruthlessness of the dictator, created a leadership
and territory void into which jihadists suddenly poured (apparently out of nowhere). Somehow, these spontaneously generating
jihadists managed to entice recruits, vastly increasing in number and power (even though — you’ll have to trust us on
this — the moderate, secular Muslims really want nothing to do with them).
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how ISIS was born and
al-Qaeda rose from the ashes.
You buying it? Me neither.
About 20 years ago, I prosecuted a dozen jihadists, led
by the “Blind Sheikh,” Omar Abdel Rahman, for waging a terrorist war against
the United States — including the World Trade Center bombing and a plot to
attack the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels, as well as other New York City
landmarks. The defendants were caught on tape building bombs, scheming to
strike at American military sites, and planning attacks timed to achieve
maximum infidel carnage.
At trial, the jihadists tried to tell the jury they were
just moderate, peace-loving Muslims who had been provoked by American foreign
policy, a perception of anti-Muslim bias, and videos of Muslims being
persecuted in Bosnia. The Blind Sheikh insisted his incitements to jihad were
simply a case of faithfully applying sharia principles, which, according to his
lawyers, the First Amendment gave him the right to do.
So I asked the jury a simple question:
Is there any obnoxious, insulting, infuriating thing I
could say to you, or show to you, that would convince you to join up with
mass-murdering terrorists? To become a terrorist yourself?
Of course, a dozen commonsense New Yorkers did not need
to be asked such a question. They laughed the defense out of the courtroom.
Alas, in the 20 years since, the defense they laughed out
of the courtroom has become the bipartisan government policy of the United
States.
Go figure.
No comments:
Post a Comment