By Kevin D. Williamson
Sunday, October 11, 2015
The Republicans have decided to have a little bit of
authentic democracy within their party, and polite Washington is flipping out.
John Boehner decided that he no longer wants to be
speaker of the House, or a member of Congress, so he is retiring. This in
itself confuses and vexes official Washington: Why would a man who worked so
hard in his life, rising from very modest origins to become the
second-most-powerful man in government, voluntarily relinquish power? That
there is a life beyond politics, even for the speaker of the House, is beyond
them.
Boehner’s No. 2, Kevin McCarthy, thought he wanted the
job, but he didn’t. Facing a revolt on the Right and a Democratic caucus happy
to see any Republican discomfited, and having himself made a crude and
embarrassing error with his boasting about using the Benghazi investigation
against Hillary Rodham Clinton, McCarthy decided that, for the moment, House
majority leader is as far as he desires to rise. The decision was “a shocking
move that throws the House into chaos,” CNN claims.
But the House isn’t in chaos. It has a complete
leadership structure in place, with Boehner staying on as long as needed. There
probably will be another fight with the White House and congressional Democrats
about various spending authorizations. In the Senate, Democratic leader Harry
Reid already is blocking an energy bill in a purely political attempt to force
Republicans to cobble everything together into one big Frankenstein’s monster
of a bill that will be too big to stop. There will be a fight over legislation
to raise the debt ceiling, which the federal government is expected to hit on
November 4, and over general operational funding, which will expire in
December. The usual hysterical ninnies will shriek that the United States is
about to default on its debt (it isn’t) and that allowing general spending
authorization to expire for a few days or weeks will lead to anarchy (it
won’t).
What really has the salon set shaking its head is that
the Republican party, which has within it a steep disagreement about tactics,
priorities, pace, and style, has decided to settle some of those questions
through an authentic democratic process. There is, apparently, going to be a
real race for the speaker’s gavel, rather than a negotiated settlement among
party leaders organized around the question of whose turn it is. A real
democratic fight instead of a backroom party-machine process — that is what CNN
calls a House in chaos.
Well, bring on the chaos.
The most interesting thing about this moment is that it
captures in miniature the broader reality that something close to the entirety
of substantive political debate in these United States is on and among the
Right. The fight in the House is an intra-conservative fight, despite the best
efforts of our talk-radio friends and the circus monkeys on cable to magically
transplant John Boehner et al. from the political tradition of Ronald Reagan to
that of Woodrow Wilson. On the left, there is endless rehashing of the economic
policies of the 1930s and the sad, deluded liberationist socio-sexual ethic of
the 1970s, and the hot topic is whether the Democratic field is too old and too
white and whether Jonathan Chait is too male (assuming that’s how he
identifies) and too white to remark upon the whiteness.
On the right, there’s a genuine fight.
There are cautious, reserved, process-oriented
conservatives among GOP leaders — Boehner, McCarthy, etc. — who are
conservative both in the ideological sense and in the temperamental sense. And
in opposition to them, there are radical conservatives, impatient with the pace
of change and excited almost beyond endurance that Barack Obama, the unlikely
left-wing back-bench nobody from Chicago, has twice managed to get himself
elected president, to keep his partisans in line, and to frustrate the hell out
of Republicans despite their holding their best position in Congress and in the
states since . . . ever, really. A great many of these more radical
conservatives are good, genuine, valuable public servants, some of whom also
want to be president. A few of them, mainly outside of government, are cynical
media manipulators who traffic in perpetual artificial outrage because
perpetual artificial outrage is how you sell people gold coins and freeze-dried
apocalypse entrees.
This is the radicals’ moment. Boehner and McCarthy have
simultaneously knuckled under and issued a challenge: “Okay, big boys, you
don’t like our leadership? Let’s see what you’ve got.” There are some potential
answers to that question that are very exciting.
The House is about to find out whether the more energetic
conservatives long dissatisfied with the leadership of John Boehner can
effectively put forward one of their own for the top House job — and, if they
do, Congress and the country are about to find out what that means. As a way of
settling a genuine political dispute, this could hardly be improved upon.
Washington retreats to its fainting couch. A passionate
fight over ideas, over how we govern and to what ends? Angels and ministers of
grace defend us!
No comments:
Post a Comment