By Jonah Goldberg
Wednesday, June 24, 2015
‘Lots of folks expected us to do something strange and
break out in a riot. Well, they just don’t know us,” the Reverend Norvel Goff
told the packed, multiracial congregation of Emanuel African Methodist
Episcopal Church in Charleston, S.C., on Sunday. It was the first service since
the horrific slaughter of nine innocent souls by a racist fanatic.
Not being a Christian, I can only marvel at the dignity
and courage of the victims’ relatives who forgave the shooter. If I could ever
manage such a thing, it would probably take me decades. It took them little
more than a day.
Less shocking, but almost as uplifting, was the conduct
of the broader Charleston community, which has been unified and dignified,
despite the expectations of some in the media — and the accused gunman, who had
singled out Charleston because of its success at racial integration.
And this points to Goff being right, not just about
Charleston but about the South in general.
There are few subjects that ignite more casual,
uninformed bigotry and condescension from elites in this nation than Dixie.
“Practically the whole region has rejected nearly everything that’s good about
this country and has become just one big nuclear waste site of choleric, and
extremely racialized, resentment,” the Daily Beast’s Michael Tomasky wrote last
year.
How then to explain the tens of thousands of South
Carolinians, white and black, marching in unity across the Ravenel Bridge on
Sunday night? Did the city bus in decent Northerners?
The Washington Post’s Sally Jenkins glibly asserts that
“the Confederate battle flag is an American swastika, the relic of traitors and
totalitarians, symbol of a brutal regime, not a republic.”
If it were left to me, I would take the flag down (for
the reasons South Carolina governor Nikki Haley laid out Monday). But this kind
of cheap moral preening is galling. Is it really too much for people to muster
the moral imagination that the issue isn’t nearly as simple as that?
A November poll of South Carolinians found that 61
percent of blacks wanted it down. That means nearly four in ten blacks felt
differently. Are they deluded? Are they the moral equivalent of self-loathing
Jews, happy to live under a swastika?
It’s a sure bet that some of the white South Carolinians
marching across that bridge and attending services at Emanuel AME Church also
support keeping the flag. That doesn’t mean they’re right, but they surely
aren’t the American SS of Jenkins’s imagination either.
Blogger Glenn Reynolds noted that when the South was
solidly Democratic, we got Gone With the Wind nostalgia. Now that it is profoundly
less racist, but also less useful to Democrats, it’s the enemy of all that is
decent and good.
If we’re going to offer ridiculous flag comparisons, a
better one would be the Japanese imperial flag. After World War II, the U.S.
banned it until 1949. Douglas MacArthur then opted to let a defeated,
once-authoritarian society keep a few symbols of its past in order to build a
better future.
Can anyone argue that the South hasn’t done likewise?
White Northern liberals explain how the South is an irredeemable cesspool of
hate, while ignoring the fact that blacks are abandoning the Northern blue
states in huge numbers to move to the South.
Demographer Joel Kotkin found that 13 of the 15 best
cities in the country for African Americans to live in are now in the South.
Over the last decade, millions of African Americans have been reversing the
Great Migration of a century ago to live in Dixie. A big part of that story is
economic, of course — the “blue state” model has failed generations of
minorities — but it’s also cultural. Word has gotten out that while the flags
may be around in some places, the Old Confederacy is gone.
Whenever conservatives complain that blacks vote
monolithically Democratic, liberals are quick to argue that this is a rational
decision given the realities of the black community. Surely, the same thing
holds when they vote with their feet?
No, the South isn’t perfect; name a region that is. But
it does have good manners, which is why it routinely acts with more dignity —
and in Charleston, with more grace — than its critics to the north.
No comments:
Post a Comment