By Dennis Prager
Tuesday, June 02, 2015
The difference between Right and Left addressed in this
column concerns a fundamentally different method that each utilizes to improve
society.
Conservatives believe that the way to a better world is
almost always through moral improvement of the individual — by each person
doing battle with his own moral defects. It is true that in particularly
violent and evil societies such as fascist, Communist, and Islamist tyrannies,
the individual must be preoccupied with battling outside forces. Almost
everywhere else, however, certainly in a free and decent country such as
America, the greatest battle of the individual must be with inner forces — that
is, with his or her flawed character and moral defects (see Left-Right Difference No. 1 concerning their differing perceptions of human nature).
The Left, on the other hand, believes that the way to a
better world is almost always through doing battle with society’s moral defects
(real or as perceived by the Left). Thus, in America, the Left defines the good
person as the one who fights the sexism, racism, intolerance, xenophobia,
homophobia, Islamophobia, and other evils that the Left believes permeate
American society.
That is one reason those on the left are more preoccupied
with politics than are those on the right. A simple example should make this
point clear. Whenever the terms “activist” or “social activist” or “organizer”
are used, one infers that the term refers to someone on the left.
One consequence of this difference is that conservatives
believe that good is achieved far more gradually than liberals do. The process
of making a better world is largely a one-by-one-by-one effort. And it must be
redone in every single generation. The noblest generation ever born still has
to teach its children how to battle their natures. If it doesn’t, even the best
society will begin to rapidly devolve, which is exactly what conservatives
believe has been happening to America since the end of World War II.
The Left does not focus on individual character
development. Rather, it has always and everywhere focused on social revolution.
The most revealing statement of then-presidential candidate Barack Obama, the
most committed leftist ever elected president of the United States, was made
just days before the 2008 election: “We are five days away from fundamentally
transforming the United States of America,” he told a large, rapturous
audience.
Conservatives not only have no interest in fundamentally
transforming the United States, they are passionately opposed to doing so.
Fundamentally transforming any but the worst society — not to mention
transforming what is probably the most decent society in history — can only
make the society worse. Of course, conservatives believe that America can be
improved, but not transformed, let alone fundamentally transformed.
The Founders all understood that the transformation that
every generation must work on is the moral transformation of each citizen.
Thus, character development was at the core of both child rearing and of young
people’s education at school.
As John Adams said: “Our Constitution was made only for a
moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
And in the words of Benjamin Franklin: “Only a virtuous
people are capable of freedom.”
Why is that? Because freedom requires self-control.
Otherwise external controls — which means an ever more powerful government —
will have to be imposed.
The more that leftist ideas influence society, the less
character education there is. Instead, children are taught to focus on social
issues. For example, the Wall Street Journal just reported that Common Core,
the federal standards program for elementary and high schools, has just
unveiled a new K-12 science curriculum, the “Next Generation of Science
Standards,” which will indoctrinate young Americans, from kindergarten on, into
the “correct” views on global warming.
And when they get to college, American young people will
be taught about the need to fight such things as “white privilege” and the
“rape culture” on their campuses.
At the same time, fewer and fewer young Americans believe
that there are any moral truths, as a professor of philosophy recently wrote in
the New York Times.
Meanwhile at home, fathers and religion, historically the
two primary conveyers of moral truths and moral self-discipline, are often
nonexistent.
As a result of all this, we are producing — indeed, we
have produced since World War II — vast numbers of Americans who are passionate
about carbon emissions, fighting sexism, and opposing “white privilege” but who
are also cheating on tests at unprecedentedly high levels.
But the age-old wisdom embraced by conservatives remains
as true as ever — before you fix society, you must first fix yourself.
No comments:
Post a Comment