By Ian
Tuttle
Friday,
January 09, 2015
NOTE: A
version of this piece appeared in the August 25, 2014, issue of National
Review.
Twitter
reached its most loathsome depths when, in late July, the hashtags
“#HitlerWasRight” and “#HitlerDidNothingWrong” became global trends. It was not
so long ago that Hitler was the unanimously agreed upon incarnation of evil.
Now, not 70 years after exterminating half of the world’s Jewish population, he
is finding a constituency beyond the usual skinheads and Klan holdouts.
In July,
hundreds of Jews praying for peace in the Middle East were trapped inside a
Paris synagogue. The mob outside — a group of Gaza demonstrators — lobbed
bottles and bricks at the facility and shouted, “Death to the Jews!” and
“Hitler was right!” “Hitler for president!” was the refrain days later as Gaza
protesters rampaged through Sarcelles, a Paris suburb, torching cars and Jewish
businesses.
There
is, too, the equally insidious embrace of Holocaust denial: “Faurisson is
right! Gas chambers are bulls**t!” So proclaimed many of the 17,000 protesters
who marched through Paris on last January’s “Day of Anger.” Robert Faurisson is
a French academic whose “scholarship” includes statements such as “Never did
Hitler order or permit the killing of a person because of his or her race or
religion.” Who should worry French Jews more: those who deny the first
Holocaust, or those who call for a second?
The problem
is not restricted to France. In Germany, arsonists threw Molotov cocktails at
the Bergische Synagogue in the town of Wuppertal, setting it ablaze for the
second time in a century; the first was in 1938, when it was burned to the
ground during Kristallnacht. Also in July, Gaza protesters stormed the streets
of Berlin shouting, “Gas the Jews!”
In May,
four people were gunned down outside the Jewish Museum of Belgium in Brussels.
Two months later, a Belgian doctor refused to treat a Jewish woman who had
fractured a rib, telling her son, “Send her to Gaza for a few hours, then
she’ll get rid of the pain.”
Similar
events have been reported in Malmö, Sweden. Ask Jews there — if you can find
one. In 2012, a Jewish community center was bombed, and now the sole remaining
Jewish kindergarten boasts bulletproof glass.
Swastikas
and messages such as “Anne Frank was a liar” and “Jews, your end is near” have
recently appeared on the walls and windows of Jewish businesses near Rome’s
main synagogue. In Austria, Gaza protesters rushed the field and attacked a
visiting Israeli soccer club in July. Hungary’s neo-Nazi Jobbik party won 20
percent of the vote in the country’s general election in April, while
supporters of Greece’s Golden Dawn party gathered outside the country’s
parliament in June and sang the “Horst-Wessel-Lied,” the Nazi anthem.
Jewish
Europeans cannot help but notice. In 2013, the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights
polled Jews in eight EU member states about their “experiences and perceptions”
of anti-Semitism. Of the nearly 6,000 respondents, 66 percent believe
anti-Semitism is a problem where they live, and 76 percent say it has worsened
in the past five years. Forty-six percent worry about becoming victims of
harassment, one-third worry about becoming victims of violence, and nearly
one-quarter avoid Jewish events or sites for reasons of safety.
The
result is a new exodus — in the words of the famous Jewish Soviet dissident
Natan Sharansky, “the beginning of the end of European Jewry.” In 2013 France
surpassed the United States to become the world’s second-largest source (behind
Russia) of Jews emigrating to Israel — just under 3,300. That was a 72 percent
increase from 2012. Israeli officials expected to absorb 5,000 French Jews in
2014, which would have constituted the largest emigration of French Jews to the
Holy Land since the founding of Israel in 1948. In fact, they admitted 7,000.
A 2014
poll by the Paris-based Siona, an organization of Sephardic French Jews, showed
that 74 percent of Jews in France at the time had considered emigrating because
of perceived anti-Semitism. According to the EU poll cited above, 48 percent of
Hungarian Jews and 40 percent of Belgian Jews have considered it, too — and
those numbers have no doubt ticked up in recent months.
The
causes of these trends — religious hatred, rising nationalist fervor, and
antipathy toward Israel — are several, but they are beginning to converge.
Across
Europe’s borders in recent years have flooded millions upon millions of
immigrants, the overwhelming majority from North Africa and the Middle East.
Consequently, the demographic makeup of Europe is changing rapidly. France may
be home to Europe’s largest Jewish population (500,000), but it is also home to
its largest population of Muslims — some 5 million, just under 10 percent of
the country’s total population. Four million Muslims reside in Germany. In
Belgium, Muslims constitute 6 percent of the population — but 25 percent of
Brussels. As of 2011, one in ten citizens in Malmö hailed from North Africa or
the Middle East. Because of migration and birthrates, all of those numbers are
projected to rise.
In other
words, the protesters coming out in hundreds and thousands to show support for
Gaza — often by smashing a Jewish storefront or two — rarely trace their
bloodlines back to the France of de Gaulle, let alone that of the Bourbons. The
anti-Semitic prejudices that are now not uncommon in the streets of Europe have
religious or cultural roots that, until recently, were rare on Europe’s shores.
Which is
not to deny that Europe has experienced centuries of anti-Semitism; but the
causes have traditionally been different. Small, tight-knit Jewish societies
throughout Europe, from which emerged a disproportionate number of the
continent’s successful scholars, merchants, and professional men, were
convenient scapegoats for demagogues who, keen to capitalize on periods of
calamity, aimed to convince the masses that they were oppressed. That strategy
characterized the Nazis of the 1930s, and it characterizes Golden Dawn and
Jobbik today.
Of note
is the way in which the new anti-Semitism of Europe’s immigrants and the
“old-fashioned” anti-Semitism of its radical parties are converging. In
France’s “Day of Anger” protest, demonstrators also chanted, “Jew: Get out!
France is not for you!” — thus laying claim to the national identity of a
country to which the immigrant population among them is very new. Meanwhile,
last November, Jobbik-party chairman Gábor Vona, on a visit to Turkey, declared
that “Islam is the last hope for humanity in the darkness of globalism and
liberalism.” Muslims are often anathema to nationalist organizations — the
English Defence League, for example — so the merger of the two is telling. If
jackboots and yellow stars are passé, anti-Semitism can be adapted to the needs
of the times.
And
then, of course, there is Israel. Certainly there are opponents of the State of
Israel who not are anti-Semitic, but they are increasingly difficult to find.
The tendency of anti-Israel demonstrations throughout Europe to degenerate into
mob violence against local Jews suggests that few distinguish any longer
between “the Jewish state” and Jews as such. Even the Boycott, Divestment, and
Sanctions movement, to which a number of American and European businesses,
universities, and other organizations have subscribed, often serves only as a
socially acceptable veil for anti-Semitic attitudes. Supporters of the movement
not infrequently compare Israel’s treatment of Palestinians to South African
apartheid — or even Nazi pogroms.
But the
interpenetration of religious and national identity that characterizes Israel
is what makes it unique. Few are the critics who lobby for Palestinian
repatriation and support Israel’s self-determination as an explicitly Jewish
state. A nuclear attack is not the only way to wipe Israel off the map; Israel
would be done in, too, by submitting to those who call for it to embrace a
Scandinavian-style multiculturalism that seeks something over and above what
Israel already guarantees: equal rights for Jews and non-Jews. An Israel that
is not Jewish is not Israel.
And an
Israel that is not Jewish would offer no sanctuary to Jews persecuted in
pluralistic societies elsewhere. The unique character and role of the Jewish
people in human history — its social cohesion, its disproportionate
contribution to the West’s cultural heritage, its abiding faith in its
“chosenness,” its exilic consciousness — has fomented a unique hatred against
it. The mere existence of a Jewish state may keep anti-Semitism at a higher pitch,
but there is ample reason to believe that Jews around the world would be even
more vulnerable without it.
Israel
is not committing a holocaust. It is ensuring that another never happens. For
Jews facing darkening prospects in Europe, that is a much-needed light.
No comments:
Post a Comment