By Charles Krauthammer
Thursday, January 22, 2015
While Iran’s march toward a nuclear bomb has provoked a
major clash between the White House and Congress, Iran’s march toward
conventional domination of the Arab world has been largely overlooked. In
Washington, that is. The Arabs have noticed. And the pro-American ones, the
Gulf Arabs in particular, are deeply worried.
This week, Iranian-backed Houthi rebels seized control of
the Yemeni government, heretofore pro-American. In September, they overran
Sanaa, the capital. On Tuesday, they seized the presidential palace. On
Thursday, they forced the president to resign.
The Houthi have local religious grievances, being Shiites
in a majority Sunni land. But they are also agents of Shiite Iran, which arms,
trains, and advises them. Their slogan — “God is great. Death to America. Death
to Israel” — could have been written in Persian.
Why should we care about the coup? First, because we
depend on Yemen’s government to support our drone war against another local
menace, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). It’s not clear if we can even
maintain our embassy in Yemen, let alone conduct operations against AQAP. And
second, because growing Iranian hegemony is a mortal threat to our allies and
interests in the entire Middle East.
In Syria, Iran’s power is similarly rising. The mullahs
rescued the reeling regime of Bashar al-Assad by sending in weapons, money, and
Iranian revolutionary guards, as well as by ordering their Lebanese proxy,
Hezbollah, to join the fight. They succeeded. The moderate rebels are in
disarray, even as Assad lives in de facto coexistence with the Islamic State,
which controls a large part of his country.
Iran’s domination of Syria was further illustrated by a
strange occurrence last Sunday in the Golan Heights. An Israeli helicopter
attacked a convoy on the Syrian side of the armistice line. Those killed were
not Syrian, however, but five Hezbollah fighters from Lebanon and several
Iranian officials, including a brigadier general.
What were they doing in the Syrian Golan Heights? Giving
“crucial advice,” announced the Iranian government. On what? Well, three days
earlier, Hezbollah’s leader had threatened an attack on Israel’s Galilee.
Tehran appears to be using its control of Syria and Hezbollah to create its
very own front against Israel.
The Israelis can defeat any conventional attack. Not so
the Gulf Arabs. To the north and west, they see Iran creating a satellite
“Shiite Crescent” stretching to the Mediterranean and consisting of Iraq,
Syria, and Lebanon. To their south and west, they see Iran gaining proxy
control of Yemen. And they are caught in the pincer.
The Saudis are fighting back the only way they can — with
massive production of oil at a time of oversupply and collapsing prices,
placing enormous economic pressure on Iran. It needs $136 oil to maintain its
budget. The price is today below $50.
Yet the Obama administration appears to be ready to
acquiesce to the new reality of Iranian domination of Syria. It has told the
New York Times that it is essentially abandoning its proclaimed goal of
removing Assad.
For the Saudis and the other Gulf Arabs, this is a
nightmare. They’re engaged in a titanic regional struggle with Iran. And they
are losing — losing Yemen, losing Lebanon, losing Syria, and watching
post-U.S.-withdrawal Iraq come under increasing Iranian domination.
The nightmare would be hugely compounded by Iran going
nuclear. The Saudis were already stupefied that the U.S. conducted secret
negotiations with Tehran behind their backs. And they can see where the current
talks are headed — legitimizing Iran as a threshold nuclear state.
Which makes all the more incomprehensible President
Obama’s fierce opposition to Congress’s offer to strengthen the American
negotiating hand by passing sanctions to be triggered if Iran fails to agree to
give up its nuclear program. After all, that was the understanding Obama gave
Congress when he began these last-ditch negotiations in the first place.
Why are you parroting Tehran’s talking points, Mr.
President? asks Democratic senator Bob Menendez. Indeed, why are we endorsing
Iran’s claim that sanctions relief is the new norm? Obama assured the nation
that sanctions relief was but a temporary concession to give last-minute,
time-limited negotiations a chance.
Twice the deadline has come. Twice no new sanctions, just
unconditional negotiating extensions.
Our regional allies — Saudi Arabia, the other five Gulf
states, Jordan, Egypt, and Israel — are deeply worried. Tehran is visibly on
the march on the ground and openly on the march to nuclear status. And their
one great ally, their strategic anchor for two generations, is acquiescing to
both.
No comments:
Post a Comment