By Ralph Benko
Tuesday, October 29, 2013
While America was distracted by the theatrics of the
government shutdown and threat of default something of much greater importance
occurred. Niall Ferguson undertook a public flogging of Paul Krugman.
Krugman’s horns now forever will show under his dislodged
faux halo. For this the world will prove a safer, and much more decent, place.
Niall Ferguson — Harvard professor (and Stanford
University’s Hoover Institution fellow, and Jesus College, Oxford, Senior
Research Fellow) — launched a three part series, in the Huffington Post,
entitled Krugtron the Invincible, Parts 1, 2 and 3 with a notable coda at
Project Syndicate. Ferguson succeeds in methodically humiliating New York Times
columnist, celebrity blogger, and Nobel economic prize laureate Paul Krugman,
together with his “gaggle of bloggers who are to Krugman what Egyptian plovers
are to crocodiles.”
Ferguson calls Krugman and his acolytes out for many,
meticulously documented, errors and omissions. And he does not just show
Krugman up as wrong but as a blackguard surrounded by a bodyguard of hooligans,
all guilty of bullying. Ferguson on Krugman:
Where I come from, however, we do not fear bullies. We
despise them. And we do so because we understand that what motivates their
bullying is a deep sense of insecurity. Unfortunately for Krugtron the
Invincible, his ultimate nightmare has just become a reality. By applying the methods
of the historian – by quoting and contextualizing his own published words – I
believe I have now made him what he richly deserves to be: a figure of fun,
whose predictions (and proscriptions) no one should ever again take seriously.
Ferguson’s riposte, a courageous, moving, and decisive
reply to Krugman’s infamous defamation, was a tour de force worthy of the
virile Glaswegian. Ferguson candidly states that among his motives was “to
teach him the meaning of the old Scottish regimental motto: nemo me impune
lacessit (‘No one attacks me with impunity’).”
After Ferguson’s prosecution and execution there isn’t
really enough of Krugman left to bury. Yet in case you missed it … let us
reprise, and celebrate, the event. The essence of Ferguson’s argument nicely is
summed up in Part 3:
I am not an economist. I am an economic historian. The
economist seeks to simplify the world into mathematical models – in Krugman’s
case models erected upon the intellectual foundations laid by John Maynard
Keynes. But to the historian, who is trained to study the world “as it actually
is”, the economist’s model, with its smooth curves on two axes, looks like an
oversimplification. The historian’s world is a complex system, full of
non-linear relationships, feedback loops and tipping points. There is more
chaos than simple causation. There is more uncertainty than calculable risk.
…
The most that we can do in this unpredictable world is
read as widely and deeply as we can, think seriously, and then exchange ideas
in a humble and respectful manner. Nobody ever seems to have explained this to
Paul Krugman. There is a reason that his hero John Maynard Keynes did not go
around calling his great rival Friedrich Hayek a “mendacious idiot” or a
“dope”.
…
For too long, Paul Krugman has exploited his authority as
an award-winning economist and his power as a New York Times columnist to heap
opprobrium on anyone who ventures to disagree with him. Along the way, he has
acquired a claque of like-minded bloggers who play a sinister game of tag with
him, endorsing his attacks and adding vitriol of their own. I would like to
name and shame in this context Dean Baker, Josh Barro, Brad DeLong, Matthew
O’Brien, Noah Smith, Matthew Yglesias and Justin Wolfers. Krugman and his
acolytes evidently relish the viciousness of their attacks, priding themselves
on the crassness of their language.
He reprises the coup de grace — that Krugman is guilty of
behavior unbecoming to a gentleman and a scholar — at Project Syndicate, in
Civilizing the Marketplace of Ideas:
Finally – and most important – even if Krugman had been
“right about everything,” there would still be no justification for the
numerous crude and often personal attacks he has made on those who disagree
with him. Words like “cockroach,” “delusional,” “derp,” “dope,” “fool,”
“knave,” “mendacious idiot,” and “zombie” have no place in civilized debate. I
consider myself lucky that he has called me only a “poseur,” a “whiner,”
“inane” – and, last week, a “troll.”
The Huffington Post reports, after the fact, that Paul
Krugman Says He’s Not Responding to Niall Ferguson (But Kind of Does).
Krugman’s plovers, of course, have recourse to their pathetic, characteristic,
tactic in defense of their idol: snark. “Business Insider’s Josh Barro probably
offers the best take because it includes a Lindsay Lohan reference: ‘Niall
Ferguson will teach us the importance of humility! Presumably in the same
manner that Lindsay Lohan can teach us the importance of sobriety.’”
A fish, indeed, rots from the head.
This columnist, from a far smaller perch, and possessed
of vastly less personal prestige, also, repeatedly, has called Krugman out.
Last July, here, in If Paul Krugman Didn’t Exist, Republicans Would Have to
Invent Him,
… Krugman ridiculed adversaries who anticipated inflation
right before the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that inflation has ticked
up, if only for a month, to 0.5% — a worrisome 6% annualized rate. (Core
remained at an unworrisome 0.2%, yet still it is a chilling gust….)
This blip does not disprove Krugman’s sanguine stance on
inflation. It may yet prove, however, were further proof needed, that the
Greeks were right: Nemesis inevitably follows hubris. Prof. Krugman might
privately reflect on this … and on his own call, in 2002, that “Alan Greenspan
needs to create a housing bubble to replace the Nasdaq bubble.”
Krugman, the record shows, was an accessory to the crime
of the century: the creation of the housing bubble that produced the financial
collapse. Krugman, conveniently, has forgotten.
But the record is indelible.
Last April, this columnist here set forth Paul Krugman v.
David Stockman: The Great Debate Over Gold Continues, noting how
Krugman himself got acidly critiqued by the populist
progressive Mike Whitney in CounterPunch for blowing his debate with Stockman
on This Week: ‘… It’s that Krugman’s elitist way of saying, ‘You dopes can’t
possibly understand the economy, so leave it all to us experts.’ … And that’s
how it ended, with Krugman backing up against the ropes while Stockman
delivered one haymaker after another like a windmill spinning in a gale-storm.
Mercifully, moderator Stephanopoulos intervened and stopped the carnage…’
And, last year, here, Unemployment Reality to Paul
Krugman: “I Refute It Thus”
Krugman’s Fairy Tales would be wonderful entertainment …
but for their power to destroy the livelihoods of millions. The confusions
Krugman and his progressive colleagues sow in the minds of less astute policy
makers have led, and are leading, to pure misery for millions of working
people.
Krugman, himself a member of the nomenklatura rather than
a worker, professes to champion labor’s interests. But the evidence is that his
prescriptions crush our dreams.
The gentlemanly Keynes, whose reputation Krugman sullies
by exalting, wrote, in the General Theory of Unemployment, Interest, and
Money (chapter 24, part V):
[T]he ideas of economists and political philosophers,
both when they are right and when they are wrong, are more powerful than is
commonly understood. Indeed the world is ruled by little else. Practical men,
who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influences, are
usually the slaves of some defunct economist. Madmen in authority, who hear
voices in the air, are distilling their frenzy from some academic scribbler of
a few years back.
Paul Krugman is a primary perp in the popular
distillation of frenzy in our era of political economic discourse. Shame now is
on him, and on his editors, for debauching contemporary journalistic standards
with so much unfit to print.
Now Niall Ferguson has court-martialed Paul Krugman for
intellectual high crimes and misdemeanors, administering a long overdue public
flogging. Ferguson also, conveniently, has disposed of “Krugman’s plovers” …
who henceforth deserve to be known by that fine diminutive, befitting their
very diminutive stature.
Keynes, in The General Theory, continued his reflection
on public intellectuals: “But, soon or late, it is ideas, not vested interests,
which are dangerous for good or evil.” While you were watching the melodrama in
Washington, Niall Ferguson captured the intellectual high ground and indicted,
and convicted, the perpetrator of many “ideas … dangerous … for evil.”
Ferguson thereby makes the world a safer, and more
humane, place.
Play Taps for Private Krugman.
No comments:
Post a Comment