National Review Online
Monday, October 07, 2013
‘I just don’t know what they’re trying to accomplish.” So
says Jim Hagen, South Dakota’s secretary of tourism, about the federal
government’s blocking off not only the entrance to the Mount Rushmore monument
but also roadside viewing areas outside the park. “They won’t even let you pull
off on the side of the road,” he says, noting that this particular act of
shutdown theater is damaging his state’s tourism economy and ruining the plans
of countless travelers. Shutdowns are strangely labor-intensive things: After
setting up traffic cones to block off the Mount Rushmore viewing areas, the
feds had to pick them up again because of a blizzard, but apparently had plans
to put them right back down again after the plowing is done. Perhaps Mr. Hagen
has too gentle a cast of mind to appreciate just what the Obama administration
is trying to accomplish: It is an act of political theater, a gross and
possibly illegal abuse of political power, an assault on private property, and
a wanton subjugation of responsible governance to the political interests of
President Obama and his party.
Consider the case of Ralph and Joyce Spencer, 77 and 80
years of age, respectively, who were evicted from their home on Lake Mead in
Nevada by an officious park ranger who told them they had 24 hours to vacate
the premises. The Spencers own their home outright, but it sits on land leased
from the federal government. A lease is a legal contract, and the government
shutdown presents no legitimate reason for the violation of that contract. Even
if it did, the place to settle such a dispute is in a court of law — not
through the arbitrary exercise of federal police power. This is not a blunder:
It is the malicious harassment of private citizens in their own homes by an
administration intent on creating hardships and then using them for propaganda
purposes. You own your home right up until the moment when that the fact
becomes inconvenient to President Obama.
Likewise, monuments that require no federal oversight —
being, as they are, open to the public — have been barricaded by the federal
government as part of the shutdown theater. The government has even ordered the
closure of state-operated parks that sit on federal land. Anna Eberly, who
manages the Claude Moore Colonial Farm in McLean, Va., one such shut-down park,
says: “In all the years I have worked with the National Park Service, I have
never worked with a more arrogant, arbitrary, and vindictive group representing
the NPS.” “Vindictive” is the right word: It takes federal action to close the
sites and none to keep them open. This is not what an inactive government looks
like, but a spiteful one.
Likewise, federal websites have been shut down rather
than left alone, with the selection of blacked-out sites being “bafflingly
arbitrary,” in the words of Ars Technica. The Amber Alert site at the
Department of Justice was taken offline, but the first lady’s “Let’s Move”
campaign remained up and running. As with the case of the roped-off monuments,
it takes more work and resources to black out websites than it does to simply
leave them be. The administration is willing to do a great deal of work for a
political stunt, but apparently takes a nonchalant view of the situation of
abducted children.
Or veterans. After closing off the World War II Memorial
in Washington, the administration partly reversed itself, declaring the site
open for “First Amendment activities.” In the United States, having a thought
in one’s head or a word in one’s mouth is a First Amendment activity. We do not
exercise our rights at the sufferance of the federal government; Washington is
named after a man who fought for that principle, an irony apparently lost on
Barack Obama.
The point of this federal propaganda exercise is obvious:
The administration seeks to gin up ill will against the Republican-controlled
House of Representatives for refusing to crumble when Obama and the Senate
peremptorily refuse to even consider its proposals. But there is a bit more to
it than that. The Obama administration cleaves to the notion that “government
is the only thing we all belong to,” as the Democrats put it during their 2012
convention, and it seeks to put the state at the center of national life. That
the government has resorted to turning old people out of their homes suggests a
level of ruthlessness that is shocking if not surprising. The Democrats have
called their opponents “hostage-takers” in this matter — but they are the ones
conducting seizures.
This may simply be an extreme version of the Democrats’
usual strategy of closing the Washington Monument, but it is notable extremism:
throwing people out of their homes and forcing the shutdown of non-federal
facilities. It is, if anything, an excellent illustration of why conservatives
believe that the tentacles of the federal government are too long and too many.
No comments:
Post a Comment