By Debra J. Saunders
Thursday, October 31, 2013
Apparently, President Barack Obama was fibbing when he
said in 2009 that under his Affordable Care Act, "if you like your health
care plan, you'll be able to keep your health care plan, period." On
Wednesday, Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler rated that pledge as a
four-Pinocchio whopper.
On Monday, Peter Lee, the executive director of Covered
California, the Golden State's Obamacare exchange, informed the San Francisco
Chronicle's editorial board that 800,000 to 900,000 Californians will lose
their individual health care plans at the end of the year. Nationally, as many
as half of the millions of consumers with private plans will lose their
coverage and have to buy an Obamacare plan. Asked about Obama's promise, Lee
responded that it was "not well-stated" and "may have been an
inarticulate way of describing what the realities are."
Lee argues that Covered California policies are better
than today's private plans. Exchange policies offer no lifetime cap on
benefits, preventive care with no copayments, and no refusal for pre-existing
conditions. Quoth Lee, consumers "can shop as they never did before."
Likewise, White House spokesman Jay Carney charged that
the current individual health care market is "the Wild West" with
"substandard" care. The suggestion is that those who are about to be
thrown off their health plans should be grateful.
James Stokes of Novato, Calif., isn't a happy shopper. An
Obama voter, he wrote to me that his family premiums will more than double if
he buys under Covered California. "Double premiums for the same service as
before," Stokes wrote. "Am I missing something here?"
Robert Laszewski, a Virginia insurance industry
consultant, won't be sending the White House a thank-you note. Blue Cross
canceled his "Cadillac" policy. "Never had a procedure for
either my wife or myself turned down," he blogged. "Wellness benefits
are without a deductible. It covers mental health, drugs, maternity, anything I
can think of."
If he buys on the exchange, Laszewski found, he'll have
to pay a 66 percent higher premium for reduced benefits.
House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton
has drafted a "Keep Your Health Plan Act" to save people such as
Stokes and Laszewski.
I asked Laszewski what he thought of the Upton bill.
"This makes sense, given all of the Obamacare government delays," he
replied. He recognizes the downsides: "Will the insurance companies be
expected to take all of the sick people with no expectation they will get the
healthy people to pay the bills? Will the sick be able to sign up at will while
the healthy sit it out?"
"From a political standpoint, it looks like a
reasonable compromise," reasoned Joshua Archambault, health policy
director for the Pioneer Institute. "From a policy standpoint, it could
put the insurers in a very tough spot." Insurers based their new premiums
on the expectation that they'd enroll healthy consumers who cannot keep their
old plans.
"If we can get a delay, we should delay it,"
argues Lanhee Chen, a Hoover Institution fellow and former policy adviser to
Mitt Romney.
Chen can think of modest fixes -- such as adjusting
subsidies to reflect the cost of living -- but sees dicey politics for
Republicans who suggest them: "It's just politically so hard because then
you get accused of being sympathetic to the law."
Because Obamacare is going to start Jan. 1, I'd like to
see a Republicans-to-the-rescue plan. Instead, the R's are going for the
cheap-and-easy moment -- for example, Upton's two-page bill that somehow
expects insurers to play along.
Maybe Republicans don't think it's in their interest to
fix the Affordable Care Act. Or maybe there's no point in reviving the canary
in the coal mine. Most likely, like the Democrats who wrote it, the Republicans
have no idea how to fix Obamacare.
No comments:
Post a Comment