By Jonah Goldberg
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
I never thought the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman case
deserved nearly the attention it got. But reasonable people can disagree about
that. What strikes me as unconscionable, however, is the way the supposedly
objective media have not only sensationalized a tragedy but at times appear to
deliberately bend the facts to fit a desired story line. Maybe it started with
the use of pictures of a younger Martin or with the sudden embrace of the term
"white Hispanic" to describe Zimmerman in order to more easily paint
him as a racist.
NBC News was the most egregious offender on this score.
Producers edited Zimmerman's 911 call to make it sound as if he were targeting
Martin because of his race. The "Today" show ran audio of Zimmerman
saying, "This guy looks like he's up to no good ... he looks black."
Those ellipses hide the fact Zimmerman said "he looks black" only
after the operator asked him to describe Martin. (NBC has apologized, and
Zimmerman is suing.)
Any hope that the editorializing would end with the trial
was naive. National Public Radio recently profiled Sybrina Fulton, Martin's
mother. In response to the tragedy and the trial, Fulton has become a civil
rights activist, NPR reported.
It was a deferential piece, and understandably so. Who
wants to add to the woman's pain? But there's a difference between deference
and advocacy. In a speech to the National Urban League, Fulton said her son was
killed "all because of a law, a law that has prevented the person who shot
and killed my son to be held accountable and to pay for this awful crime."
And how did NPR's Greg Allen put that statement in
context? He told listeners: "Fulton is one of many pushing for a repeal of
Florida's 'stand your ground' law." He noted that sit-ins have been staged
but that the Florida governor remains "unmoved." And that was it.
Allen then went on to report that one of the jurors told
ABC News, "George Zimmerman got away with murder but you can't get away
from God." We owe that revelation to ABC's interview with Juror B29,
a.k.a. "Maddy." The sole nonwhite juror in the case, Maddy made that
remark to ABC's Robin Roberts. The quote went viral across electronic and print
media.
The only problem: It's not clear that's what she thinks.
As Will Saletan of Slate magazine notes, the video was artfully edited to make
it appear as if Maddy generated this thought on her own. But when you watch an
unedited segment, she's repeating back a statement by Roberts, and ABC News was
happy to let the misinterpretation stand.
Letting misinterpretations stand is the hallmark of the
media's coverage of this story. For instance, nowhere in NPR's report did Allen
mention that Zimmerman's defense team never mentioned Florida's "stand
your ground" law. They argued traditional self-defense. The decision not
to arrest Zimmerman in the first place wasn't about that law either, despite
widespread insistence that it was.
Much has been made of the fact that the judge's
instructions to the jury included the phrase "right to stand his ground,"
without noting that it is part of a standard jury instruction. As prosecutor
John Guy declared, "This case is not about standing your ground."
This is not to say that "stand your ground"
laws have no conceivable bearing on the Zimmerman case. Thoughtful critics of
such laws, including President Obama, worry that they might create a climate in
which people are too quick to resort to deadly force.
But that is an airy justification for the media to treat
the law as if it were central to the whole controversy. Is it conceivable that
NPR would let, say, a gun rights activist's wildly tendentious interpretation
of a law stand without some explanation or context? Why should opponents of
"stand your ground" laws get different treatment?
I think part of the answer is that the media and civil
rights groups want a consolation prize. They didn't get the verdict -- or the
story line -- they wanted. But they need to get something positive out of this.
I certainly understand why Trayvon Martin's family feels that way. I fail to
see why the media should so eagerly oblige.
No comments:
Post a Comment