By Kurt Schlichter
Tuesday, July 23, 2013
The agonizing death of Detroit is cause for celebration.
It’s the first of the liberal-run big cities and states to fall, and we should
welcome its collapse with glee.
Yeah, liberals, eventually you do run out of other
people’s money.
The blue state model is a terminal disease, and Detroit
is its poster child. Only this is one telethon where we should pledge that we
won’t pay a single dime to keep the progressive party going a single minute
longer.
Detroit represents the epitome of the blue state,
Democrat machine liberalism that Barack Obama represents. Well, not one damn
cent for Barry’s Kids.
Liberal media mouthpieces like the New York Times are all
in a tizzy because the consequences conservatives have been warning America
about for years are finally arriving. “We have to step in and save Detroit,” it
cries.
We don’t have to do any such thing.
Steven Rattner, writing in the Times, says “But apart
from voting in elections, the 700,000 remaining residents of the Motor City are
no more responsible for Detroit’s problems than were the victims of Hurricane
Sandy for theirs, and eventually Congress decided to help them.” And apart from
the iceberg, the Titanic’s maiden voyage went swimmingly.
This is a problem created by the people of Detroit. It’s
their problem to solve – without our money.
If you listen to the hand-wringers, you’ll never hear an
honest examination of why Detroit is imploding. Nor do they offer any evidence
that the half-wits who elected the quarter-wit Democrats governing them have
learned anything at all from this trip to the precipice.
The most hilarious arguments are the ones where liberals
whine about the middle class fleeing from the city, taking jobs and the tax
base with them. Sure, regular folks took a look at the well-governed, stable,
crime-free Utopia that was Detroit and thought, “Yeah, we need to get the hell
out of here.”
Liberalism and the political, economic and social
pathologies it spawned drove everyone out of Detroit who wasn’t feeding at the
municipal trough, whether through some form of government job or some form of government
handout.
This isn’t a chicken and the egg brainteaser. It’s simple
cause and effect. Liberalism turned Detroit into a hideous dump that milked
those who contribute to society to pay off the Democrat machine’s constituents
who don’t. People didn’t feel like living in a pig sty while serving as piggy
banks for corrupt Democrats. The productive decided that while the
non-productive might win by voting at the ballot box, the productive would win
by voting with their feet.
Yeah, Detroit had some hard knocks. The auto industry
collapsed, which is not surprising since it was the blue state model in
corporatist form. But every city takes hits. Dallas and Houston have been
slammed again and again by the energy sector, and they keep coming back.
Not Detroit. It keeps milking the “GM went bye-bye”
excuse, with its apologists never mentioning that GM didn’t just disappear. GM
just went to places that didn’t suck.
What did Detroit do about it? Nothing. The auto industry
started changing decades ago, but liberals act as if that change somehow
excuses Detroit’s legacy of corruption and incompetence. Detroit’s most
significant export in decades was Eminem. That’s reason enough to want to see a
stake driven through its metaphorical heart.
But, of course it’s all the Republicans’ fault…for some
reason. Rattner says, “If I thought it could pass Congress, I’d happily support
a special appropriation, but the politics of any spending are toxic in
Washington these days.” Yeah, it is toxic to suggest that those of us who
didn’t vote in a succession of criminals to run our governments give our money
to morons who did. And, in any sane universe, no one would ever suggest doing
so.
But this is the Times, the voice of Big Liberalism. It
opines that, “America is just as much about aiding those less fortunate as it
is about personal responsibility.” Except, America isn’t about “aiding the less
fortunate.” It’s about the “less fortunate” working to make themselves “more
fortunate” – understanding that liberals think people become financially stable
not through hard work but by dumb luck.
Not surprisingly, in a Times article referring to the
miserable condition of a city run by a liberal Democrat machine for half a
century, there is no mention of either liberalism or Democrats. That’s like
writing about obesity and not mentioning food.
The liberal elite, which loves root causes, absolutely
refuses to admit that the root cause of Detroit’s woes is liberalism itself.
Liberals are like a drunk who wants the benefits of sobriety while continuing
to hoist highballs. Step One is admitting that their ideology has a problem.
Fat chance. For liberalism, the answer is “5,” and it’s
the “2 + 2” that’s somehow screwed up.
We conservatives should sit back and giggle as liberalism
hits bottom. No, Detroit’s collapse won’t teach liberals anything. The big
cities and the blue states will fail no matter what. Liberalism is the locust
of political ideologies; it will eat everything in sight and then starve.
But Detroit may serve a useful purpose once again as a
cautionary example for future generations, so for that reason as well we should
welcome its passing. And as it dies, the last words ringing in its ears should
be the voices of laughing conservatives saying, “We told you so.”
No comments:
Post a Comment