Monday, July 02, 2012
When the House voted last Thursday to find Attorney
General Eric Holder in criminal contempt of Congress, members of the
Congressional Black Caucus walked out.
Why is the Black Caucus trying to make this about race?
It’s about Holder’s refusal to turn over Justice
Department documents requested by the House Oversight and Government Committee
in its investigation of the “Fast and Furious” operation.
“Fast and Furious” was a “gun-walking” operation
conducted by the Justice Department’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms
(ATF). ATF would allow known smugglers to purchase arms from dealers in Arizona
with the idea that they would trace them to their destination to operatives in
drug cartels in Mexico.
Before the vote, Black Caucus chairman Emanuel Cleaver
(D-MO) appeared on CNN calling the House contempt vote “....silly and
detrimental to one human being.” On MSNBC he told Al Sharpton, “This is
partisanship at its most base level.”
Sure, it’s an election year. And if you had to stretch to
appreciate the complaint against Holder being made by Rep. Darrell Issa
(R-Calif), chairman of the House committee doing the investigation, you might
buy Cleaver’s claim that this is just Republican political grandstanding.
But you don’t have to stretch to appreciate the case
against Holder.
It seems pretty clear that “Fast and Furious” was a
botched operation. The ATF lost track of some two thousand weapons that
disappeared into the hands of criminals in Mexico. In December 2010, weapons
traced to this operation were found on smugglers who murdered U.S. Border Agent
Brian Terry. Others were tied to the murder of at least 200 Mexican citizens.
The investigation into these ATF activities began with
inquiries by ranking Senate Judiciary Committee member Charles Grassley
(R-Iowa) after Agent Terry’s murder.
The Justice Department, in a letter to Senator Grassley,
initially denied the existence of gun-walking operations. But this picture
changed when ATF whistleblowers brought facts to the contrary to light.
Subsequently, Justice withdrew its letter, saying its denial of the existence
of these operations was mistaken.
Inconsistencies in Holder’s testimony before the House
committee produced further reasons for suspicion. And then Holder’s stonewalling
for months, refusing to produce the documentation that the House committee
requested.
Whether there is a fire here remains to be seen. But
there is plenty of smoke.
Yet Cleaver calls the House vote holding Holder in
contempt “silly?” The chairman of the Black Caucus should have the opposite
reaction if only for concern for his own community. Illegal drugs smuggled into
the US from Mexico cause havoc among black youth. According to the Center for
American Progress, there have been more than 25.4 million drug convictions in
the US since 1980, and one third of them were black.
To grasp what’s really motivating Cleaver, I apply what I
call the “A Time to Kill” test.
In the 1996 film “A Time to Kill”, a black man in a town
in Mississippi hires a white lawyer to defend him after he kills two white
racists who raped and mutilated his daughter. When the lawyer makes his closing
argument to the jury, he asks them to close their eyes. He describes the
atrocities that were done to the girl and concludes by saying “now imagine
she’s white.” His black defendant is acquitted.
So close your eyes. Consider the details about “Fast and
Furious” and then picture that the Attorney General is not Eric Holder but John
Ashcroft (first Attorney General of President G.W. Bush) and that the murdered
border agent, Brian Terry, is black.
Would Emanuel Cleaver now call this contempt vote
“silly?” Would the Black Caucus have walked out?
For the Black Caucus this is about racial politics.
Fortunately for us, for Darrell Issa (who happens to
represent my home district in California) this is about shedding light on what
might be broken in ATF operations.
No comments:
Post a Comment