Friday, July 13, 2012
In numerous national polls, Mitt Romney is in a dead heat
with President Obama. But many conservatives are dissatisfied with Romney’s
campaign. They want to hear more, especially on the policy front. From the Wall
Street Journal editorial page to National Review Online, calls for specificity have
grown from a murmur to a clamor.
As we chat on Capitol Hill, Jim Talent, a top Romney
policy adviser, acknowledges the blank-slate tag that has dogged Romney for
months. But with respect to the critics, he says, such complaints are
unwarranted. “I would really encourage people to follow what he’s saying day to
day, because he has a very detailed agenda,” Talent tells me.
Talent, a former senator from Missouri, has been in
Washington this week huddling with Republican lawmakers. The case he has made
in those conversations has been relatively simple: Romney has already unveiled
most of his policy platform for the general election, so do not expect any
flashy, new proposals.
“On policy matters, there will not be some kind of
October surprise,” Talent says. “Most of Governor Romney’s policies, both
foreign and domestic, have already been outlined. You have seen some additions
in the last couple of months, and you’ll see a few more, but they will
elaborate on what he’s already talked about,” and they won’t “shock” voters.
But what about a big-picture vision? Conservatives worry
that Romney wants to make this election a referendum on Obama, not a choice
between conservative and liberal policies. Talent disagrees: “Governor Romney
understands that this is a ‘choice’ election, and that’s what he wants,” he
says. “He wants to win the election on terms where he can say, honestly, that
the American people had a real choice.
“Look, if you review what he has talked about, Governor
Romney has offered a more comprehensive agenda for change than anyone I can
remember who has run for president since Ronald Reagan,” Talent continues. “And
he has spoken clearly about what he wants to do right away.”
On health care, for example, Romney has been adamant that
he will repeal the president’s health-care law, Talent says — and at this point
in the debate, that’s enough. “We’ve not had tactical discussions with people,”
he says. “Now, if he wins the election as we hope,” then Romney will begin to
review various options. But for the moment, Boston will stick to highlighting
broad themes.
“Governor Romney has proposed a lot of specific things in
terms of replacement, such has pooling coverage with association health plans,
allowing people to buy insurance across state lines, and medical-malpractice
reform,” Talent says. “From now until November, he will promote these good
ideas about empowerment and conservative reform.”
“Now, has he sat down and talked with anyone about the
specifics about what would be in any particular bill? I’ve not been part of
those discussions,” Talent says. He expects Romney to emphasize full repeal,
period, in the run-up to the election, along with some snippets and previews of
what a Romney-presidency replacement could look like.
Romney has better impressed conservatives on education,
which he discussed in his speech to the NAACP in Houston earlier this week.
Whereas the former governor’s views on his preferred health-care system can
often seem nebulous, Romney’s education reforms are easily catalogued. His
support for charter schools has been a constant element of his campaign, and in
Texas, he pledged to “link” federal education funds to individual students,
enabling them to attend the schools of their choosing.
Foreign and defense policy is an area where Romney has
not gotten enough credit, Talent argues. From No Apology, the policy book
Romney wrote before his run, to a series of speeches he has given on the topic,
“he has drawn a contrast.” As evidence, Talent cites a litany of Romney
statements, from his criticism of China’s currency manipulation to his support
for naval shipbuilding and missile defense.
But on immigration, I ask, hasn’t Romney said quite
little? When the Supreme Court ruled on Arizona’s S.B. 1070, the campaign
issued a brief statement and Romney stuck to vague platitudes in a subsequent
speech on the topic. Once again, Talent disagrees. “He has always said that he
wants to bring this debate back to basics — border control, E-Verify, and
having a robust legal immigration process,” he says.
Same goes for entitlements. Whereas some conservatives
want Romney to better articulate aspects of the Ryan budget, Talent says
Romney’s public support of Ryan, and his many remarks on entitlements, signal
his “seriousness” about balancing the federal budget. “On Medicaid, Medicare,
and Social Security, he knows that we need to make significant changes to keep
them sustainable,” he says.
Romney has also mentioned tax reform on the stump, but he
has not been specific about the loopholes he would like to close. “If he’s
president, he would lay out the parameters, just as Reagan did in 1986 on this
issue,” Talent says. “He would not allow tax reform to be an avenue for a tax
increase, I can tell you that. But he’s open to looking at various parts of the
tax code that may need to be reformed.”
Romney’s hesitancy to offer line-by-line proposals in
each of these policy areas is not unexpected. Back in the spring, when he was
in the midst of the GOP presidential primary, Romney told The Weekly Standard
that he would likely avoid getting into the weeds this cycle, mostly because he
was burned when he did just that during his 1994 Senate bid, and lost.
“One of the things I found in a short campaign against
Ted Kennedy was that when I said, for instance, that I wanted to eliminate the
Department of Education, that was used to suggest I don’t care about
education,” Romney said. “So will there be some that get eliminated or
combined? The answer is yes, but I’m not going to give you a list right now.”
A handful of GOP observers observe that Romney’s policy
reticence is smart politics. “I think right now Romney is smart to wait before
he starts laying out proposal after proposal, but he ultimately will,” said
Haley Barbour, the former Mississippi governor, on CBS’s Face the Nation
recently. But that’s hardly the consensus. Other conservatives, including many
here at NRO, have openly complained that beyond his 20 percent tax-cut plan,
Romney has said very little.
Over the past year, Talent heard all of these arguments,
but none of them has fazed him. Romney is running a “horizontal” policy shop,
he says, where the candidate is intimately involved in discussing his positions
with many advisers, both inside and outside the campaign. Romney’s management
style, Talent says, reflects his policy strategy. Should he win the White
House, Talent expects Romney to look to push conservative policies through
Congress by working closely with congressional leaders — not by dictating
proposals from the Rose Garden.
And that’s why Talent is here, in Washington, as Romney
campaigns across the country. “Right now, it’s about building relationships,”
he tells me as we stroll by a House office building. “We are working to make
the folks here comfortable with him, and listening to what people think, and
absorbing that information into his organization.”
Indeed, as conservatives seek specifics, Talent and other
senior Romney policy advisers are not scrambling to generate white papers. To
them, this contest began as a race about the economy and it remains that. More
details may emerge at the Tampa convention, but as Talent says, the Romney
platform, for better or worse, is pretty much set.
No comments:
Post a Comment