Tuesday, July 17, 2012
According to conventional wisdom, the older the person,
the less young people are inclined to listen to him or her.
This is probably true for some of you. But I do not
believe that it is true for most of you.
Most young people have tremendous respect for older
people’s views. I saw this firsthand in my own life. I began lecturing publicly
at the age of 21, and I give you my word that young people (and certainly older
people) are far more respectful of my views today than when I was their age.
All things being equal, it is very rare for a 25- or 35-year-old to command the
respect that a 50- or 60-year-old commands.
So, I am not afraid that you will dismiss what I have to
say here as the irrelevant thoughts of an older person.
But just in case you need an argument to take an older
person’s thoughts seriously, ask any adults you respect whether they have more
wisdom and insight into life now than they did ten years ago, let alone when
they were your age. The answer will always be yes. (And any adult who has not
gained wisdom over the course of a lifetime is not worth listening to.)
Which directly leads to my point: Did you ever wonder why
people are far more likely to become conservative in their views and values as
they get older?
When this rather devastating question is posed to
liberals, leftists, progressives, Democrats — you choose the label or group —
they answer that people get more selfish as they get older.
Progressives have to give this answer. There is no other
response that enables them to avoid confronting the quite embarrassing fact
that just about every adult, at every age of life, thinks he/she is wiser than
when younger — and that as they accumulate wisdom they become more
conservative.
So the liberal explanation — that people get more selfish
as they get older — is not only insulting, it is nonsense.
People get worse as they get older?
If you were walking in a dark alley at midnight, which
would you fear more — a group of teenagers or twentysomethings or a group of
senior citizens?
Do older people or younger people give more of their time
to charitable institutions?
Are our prisons filled with young people or old people?
The fact is that not only do people get more wise and
more conservative as they get older, they get more kind and more generous, too.
But what about “idealism”? We are told that young people
are more “idealistic” than old people.
Let me respond by asking: What does “idealistic” mean?
Presumably it means having ideals — a kinder, more
peaceful world, etc. Well, who told you that as people get older they lose
these ideals? This is so untrue as to constitute a lie. If anything, we older
people yearn for a peaceful world even more than young people do. We are the
ones who lost friends or relatives in some war. We are the ones who have lived
a lifetime of seeing and reading about human suffering. And we, not you, have
children and grandchildren whom we ache to see alive and healthy.
So, let’s put to rest the self-serving myth that young people
have greater ideals than old people.
What the term “more idealistic” really means when applied
to young people is that young people are more naïve, not more idealistic, than
older people.
Examples are legion.
Here’s one: Young people believe that when the government
gives more money and benefits to more people it helps them. This is naïve. As
you get older and wiser you realize that when people are given anything without
having to earn it (unless they are physically or mentally utterly incapable of
earning anything), they become ungrateful and lazy. They also become less
happy. Every study shows that people who earn money are far happier than people
who win many millions of dollars in a lottery. Happiness is earned, not given.
Here’s another: Young people are far more likely to
believe that world peace is achieved when nations lay down their arms and talk
through their differences. But this has never been the case. Of course, good
nations stay peaceful when they talk to other good nations. Bad nations — that
is, nations ruled by evil men — are never dissuaded from making war by talk.
They are dissuaded only by good nations having more arms than they do. That is
why the Marine Corps has done so much more for world peace than the Peace
Corps.
If you want to vote Democrat, don’t do so because that is
the party that cares more for the poor and the hungry. We older conservatives
(and young ones, too) care just as much for the poor. But after living a life
of seeing the naïve only make things worse for the poor, we are no longer
seduced by caring rhetoric. We are seduced by policies based on the awesome
American value of individual initiative combined with liberty to create and
retain wealth. It’s now called “conservatism.”
And, finally, you should know this: The “idealists” that
many of you find appealing are the ones leaving you with a national debt that
will render it very difficult for you to attain the material quality of life
that these people have had.
The next time President Obama goes to a college to get
your vote by promising you more and more benefits, ask him where the money will
come from. And when he says “higher taxes on the wealthy,” know that this is
exactly what they tried in Europe, a continent ruined by such “idealism.”
No comments:
Post a Comment