Sunday, July 28, 2024

The Short Goodbye

By Matthew Continetti

Thursday, July 25, 2024

 

Even before 1:46 p.m. on Sunday, July 21, when Joe Biden declared that he had changed his mind and would not be running for a second term as president, the 2024 election cycle was filled with historical rarities. Biden and Donald Trump were the two oldest major-party candidates ever. They were also among the least popular. It was the first rematch of prior nominees since 1956, and the first time since 1892 that the presumptive nominees were a sitting and a former president. President Biden suffered from the worst polling of any incumbent president since Jimmy Carter. And former president Trump was polling better than any Republican in 20 years.

 

Then things got weird. On June 27, Trump and Biden held the earliest presidential debate on record. Biden’s god-awful performance sent the Democratic Party into a spiral. The subsequent three weeks were chaotic, confusing, and acrimonious. Members of Congress called for Biden to withdraw from the race. Donors withheld campaign funds. In one of the most influential op-eds ever to be published in the New York Times, or anywhere else, the actor George Clooney demanded that Biden retire. The president fought back. He sat for interviews with ABC and NBC. He held a solo “big boy” press conference. Nothing stopped the revolt.

 

On July 13, Trump became the first sitting or former president to be shot in more than 40 years. The assassin’s bullets came within centimeters of ending Trump’s life and killed one bystander and injured two others. Days later, in Milwaukee, Trump became the first Republican to be nominated for president three consecutive times. (Eight years separated the first and second nominations of Richard Nixon, the other GOP three-timer.) A subdued Trump called for national unity. He chose Senator J. D. Vance of Ohio as his vice-presidential nominee, making Vance the first member of the Millennial generation to appear on a major-party ticket and the youngest VP nominee since Nixon in 1952.

 

On July 17, the third day of the GOP convention, Biden announced he had Covid. He cleared his schedule and self-isolated in his home in Delaware. The next day, Trump delivered the longest acceptance speech ever, bringing a remarkably successful convention to a close in the wee hours of July 19. Then Trump and Vance traveled to Grand Rapids, Mich., where they held their first rally as a ticket amid signs that President Biden’s support in battleground states was collapsing.

 

As late as midday, July 21, Biden’s campaign staff remained under the impression that their man was still in the race. Then came Biden’s announcement, delivered as a typed letter posted on the social-media platform X: “I believe it is in the best interest of my party and the country for me to stand down and focus solely on fulfilling my duties as President for the remainder of my term.” In a separate post 27 minutes later, he threw his support behind Vice President Kamala Harris.

 

Thus did Joe Biden become the first sitting president not to seek reelection in 56 years. But there is an important difference between this withdrawal and the last one. When Lyndon Johnson said that he would neither pursue nor accept his party’s nomination in 1968, the Democratic primaries were just beginning. That is not the case in 2024. Biden made his decision 107 days before the election. No presidential candidate, let alone an incumbent, has bowed out after winning his party’s primary. No candidate has thrown up his hands this late in the cycle.

 

Most Democrats greeted Biden’s departure from the race with feelings of gratitude, relief, and in some cases giddiness. They should temper their enthusiasm. While Biden’s retirement may answer one of the party’s problems, it also raises new questions. It creates a different set of problems.

 

This will be the first Election Day since 1976 without a Bush, Clinton, or Biden on the ballot. If Joe Biden completes his term in office, America will have had back-to-back one-term presidencies of opposite parties for the first time in over a century. In this epochal moment, there are three major players: Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and Donald Trump. Their personalities, policies, decisions, strategies, and next moves will determine the result of this most unusual election. Let’s examine them each in turn.

 

Biden

The end of his career is as stunning as its rebirth four years ago. In the winter of 2020, Joe Biden seemed to be finished. He placed fourth in the Iowa caucuses. He came in fifth in the New Hampshire primary. Vermont senator Bernie Sanders  beat him two to one in Nevada.

 

Biden rebounded the following week in South Carolina. Party elites consolidated behind him. As the coronavirus dominated headlines, Biden seemed the safest bet to defeat Trump. By April, the nomination was his. Then Biden retreated to his basement. He hardly was seen on the campaign trail before his first debate with Trump in October. In retrospect, it was the only debate against Trump he ever won. A month later, when the votes were counted, Biden had defeated Trump 51 percent to 47 percent.

 

The next three and a half years did not go well. The lawless southern border became an issue as early as the spring of 2021. Inflation showed up not long after. That August, America retreated from Afghanistan. Thirteen service members were killed during the unnecessary, precipitous, hasty, and hazardous withdrawal. The next February, Russia invaded Ukraine.

 

Biden did not stanch the flow of illegal immigration, restore price stability, or provide Ukraine the tools it needed to launch a successful counteroffensive. Then Hamas invaded Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1,200 Israelis and taking more than 240 captives, including eight Americans. Antisemitism appeared on America’s streets and on America’s campuses. At the same time, the Iranian-backed Houthi militia in Yemen launched a war on maritime commerce. In the months since, the U.S. Navy has seen more action than at any time since World War II. Through it all, Biden dithered.

 

And through it all, Biden faced concerns about his age. He rarely spoke to the press. He returned to Delaware practically every weekend. He kept a light schedule. For three years, he and his team were able to project a façade of normalcy. Then the mirage disappeared. In February, Biden declined to be interviewed during the Super Bowl. That same month, special counsel Robert Hur released his findings about Biden’s handling of classified materials and described the president as a “well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.” A furious Biden appeared in a hastily organized press conference. That only made matters worse.

 

In front of a teleprompter, Biden could emote, inveigh, and plead in a way that resembled the backslapping Irish Catholic politician of yore. On his own, Biden was adrift. In early June, the Wall Street Journal reported that Biden showed signs of “slipping.” Evidence of his infirmities began to mount. When he traveled to France for the 80th anniversary of D-Day, Biden seemed frozen, confused, stiff. At a June 15 fundraiser in Los Angeles, Barack Obama grabbed his wrist and led him off the stage. At a Juneteenth concert a few days later, he seemed barely aware of his surroundings. As soon as he stepped on stage for the June 27 debate, it was clear that something was wrong with the president.

 

We don’t know what. Biden’s press team has dismissed reports that a specialist in Parkinson’s disease visited the White House on multiple occasions. When asked if he’d submit to a cognitive exam, Biden has dodged, saying he takes one every day on the job. (If so, he has failed repeatedly.) His condition seems to have deteriorated geometrically as the days have passed arithmetically. Biden was not seen in public for close to a week. In his letter to the American people, he spoke of fulfilling his duties as president. Does anyone seriously believe he is up to the task?

 

Republicans are asking why, if Joe Biden can’t serve four more years as president, he should serve another six months. It’s a partisan question, for sure. It is also a legitimate one.

 

Harris

The vice president is the front-runner for the 2024 Democratic nomination. She has the president’s endorsement, as well as endorsements from Bill and Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Representative James Clyburn of South Carolina, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, Governors Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania, Andy Beshear of Kentucky, Roy Cooper of North Carolina, Wes Moore of Maryland, and Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan. At this writing, Barack Obama has not made an endorsement, favoring a “process from which an outstanding nominee emerges.” By July 23, according to the AP, Harris had secured the support of enough delegates to be that nominee.

 

Right now, Democrats are excited about Harris in a way they never were about Biden. Money is deluging the campaign. The legacy media are on her side. One pool report breathlessly noted the outfit Harris wore on July 21 as she worked the phones to rally support. Liberal pundits gleefully point out that Trump is now the oldest candidate. “This Is Exactly What the Trump Team Feared,” read one headline in the Atlantic.

 

The headline writers need to take a deep breath. Harris is not a guaranteed winner. On the contrary: She enters the race with several liabilities. She has a lower favorability rating than either Biden or Trump. She is gaffe-prone. Her office has been plagued by mismanagement and turnover. And there is no saying how she will perform on the trail.

 

When Harris ran for California attorney general in 2010, she defeated Republican Steve Cooley by a mere 74,000 votes out of some 9 million cast. That was the last election in which she faced serious opposition. Representative Dean Phillips of Minnesota, who challenged Biden this year because he was rightly concerned the president was unelectable, has won more Democratic primary votes than Harris. She dropped out of the 2020 Democratic primary a full month before Iowa.

 

Harris’s office gives her the baggage of incumbency with few of the benefits. She is linked to the Biden legacy, no matter how much she or the media may deny it, while having neither the platform nor the power of the presidency to command attention and shape reality. In the spring of 2021, President Biden tasked Harris with investigating and resolving the “root causes” of illegal immigration to the United States. She was ineffectual. As the nominee of her party, Harris would have to answer not only for illegal immigration, but also for the 20 percent increase in prices since Biden took office and the chaos and American hostages held abroad. Little in her past suggests that she will respond convincingly.

 

Biden’s intention to remain president complicates Harris’s situation. When Vice President Hubert Humphrey left the 1968 Democratic convention as his party’s nominee, he had to deal with challengers Richard Nixon and George Wallace on one hand, and his boss LBJ on the other. Rather than make a clean break from Johnson, Humphrey found that he had to defend the president’s record while trying to forge an independent identity. He was unsuccessful. The dramatic events of 1968 resulted in a narrow Republican majority, with Nixon defeating Humphrey by a little more than 500,000 votes nationwide.

 

To date, most polls have shown Harris slightly more competitive than Biden. They also show her losing. Prior to July 21, Trump was ahead of Harris by two points in the RealClearPolitics average of polls. That is about where the Trump–Biden race stood before the June 27 debate.

 

Harris has a tough task ahead of her. She must reintroduce herself to the American public, for what seems like the fourth time, as an inspirational and unifying figure with a program for lowering the cost of living, fixing the border, and bringing peace to Europe and the Middle East while containing China. What she is likely to do instead is run a campaign based almost exclusively on women’s rights (including abortion), gay and trans rights, civil rights, and the defects of Donald Trump’s character. That was how Hillary Clinton ran against Trump eight years ago. It did not work out as planned.

 

Trump

Donald Trump overtook Biden in the polls last autumn and has not relinquished his lead. He rolled up the GOP nomination without having to debate. He has been indicted multiple times, found liable for sexual abuse, convicted of a felony in a New York court, and shot in a field in Pennsylvania. He installed allies on the Republican National Committee, allowed Biden to self-destruct in the debate, rewrote the GOP platform, selected a protégé as his vice president, and watched his former rivals Governor Ron DeSantis and former U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley endorse him. Trump begins the general election as the unquestioned leader of a party he remade in his image, a party more unified and enthusiastic than it has been in years. This is his election to lose.

 

And he might lose it. Democrats have outperformed expectations since 2022. A reinvigorated Democratic Party changes the dynamic of the race. Trump remains unpopular. His approval ratings are barely above Harris’s. To win, he must keep her numbers low. If independents find Harris more acceptable than Trump, if the voters who disapprove of both candidates nonetheless choose her over the former president, then his path to the presidency will narrow. Republican House and Senate candidates will waver. GOP confidence will fade.

 

But these are big ifs. As I write, the Democrats have yet to nominate candidates for president and vice president. Nor is it clear whether the nomination will be contested. The Democratic National Convention begins on August 19, leaving several weeks for turmoil. Biden’s health condition remains a mystery. Trump’s sentencing in New York has been delayed until at least September 18. He likely will debate his new opponent.

 

So much has happened in June and July that we are tempted to forget that there are several months left in the campaign. What will October bring? It’s an open race for the White House. And 2024 isn’t done with us yet.

No comments: