Thursday, September 28, 2023

Dispatches from the Undercard Debate

By Jeffrey Blehar

Thursday, September 28, 2023

 

Remember back in 2015, after nearly two terms of Obama, when it seemed like everyone and their half-cousin had decided to seek the Republican nomination for president? It was a murderers’ row of big-name Republican officeholders and businesspeople: Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Scott Walker, Rand Paul, Rick Perry, Lindsey Graham, Bobby Jindal, Mike Huckabee, Chris Christie, Carly Fiorina, Ben Carson, the son of a postman, you name it. I’m pretty sure I was running for president for a moment there early on; everybody was getting into the race, including a reality-TV vanity candidate everyone assumed would fade quickly, so the early debates had to be sorted into two tiers: the “main” debate (for the top polling candidates) and the infamous so-called undercard debates, a bizarrely pointless exercise in which six or seven also-rans yelled at one another while whistling past the graveyard about Donald Trump, who eventually became not only the nominee but president of the United States.

 

In 2023, after all that, the GOP primary debates are now brutally an undercard all to themselves. Trump considers this race won already and is acting like it: rhetorically running on a national level against Joe Biden (by speaking to autoworkers tonight instead of attending the debate). Because that basic reality looms largest of all, it’s hard to get too excited about tonight’s scrap amongst the inevitable also-rans. Given Biden’s weaknesses, they are now running for something more than mere future political prospects. (As I have said recently, to great popularity, few seem to realize just how possible a second Trump presidency is and how weird it would be.)

 

My long account is probably not worth it — I would criticize the debate moderation, the cacophony of hearing candidates bark over one another about trivial matters, Vivek Ramaswamy’s amazing retro ’90s hairstyle, and the general irrelevance of it all. My summary is this: The story of tonight was Nikki Haley, who came out confident and swinging, perhaps overaggressively at times. When she laid into Vivek it was one thing (she devastatingly unmanned him, after his defense of Chinese business and TikTok, by saying that she’d gotten stupider for listening to him), but when she savaged Tim Scott for bizarre, South Carolinian inside-baseball political beefs, she came across like a woman with an assassin’s task: Remove all competitors. One wonders how it will play: Most of the time she was on point and confident, but when she overheated and the argument began to feel personal, she revealed her fatal flaw — a balance between magnanimity and precision dagger strikes suits her overall approach better than going all in.

 

Ramaswamy sought to be more conciliatory this time, after having presented himself as the True Conservative Visionary Leader in the last debate and having been pummeled for it. None of the other candidates were having any of it, even though I think on a purely presentational level his tone was vastly improved over the last time. The visceral hatred every other candidate on the stage felt for him was rather obviously an act of psychological transference: Since Trump wasn’t there to pummel, everyone decided to pummel Trump’s avatar instead. But because Ramaswamy’s tone was different this time (and because most viewers are neither aware of nor particularly interested in his rather sketchy pre-political history), he often came off the better in these exchanges.

 

DeSantis was on his way to having another disastrous non-showing of a debate — it was almost perverse how, as the non-Trump leader in the polls, he was allowed to speak last during the horribly managed introduction — but he rescued his performance with a solid back half, including a stirring defense of life that directly took on Trump’s squishiness about the issue. But the hour was late, and the stakes just too low by that point.

 

The other candidates should drop out tomorrow. Pence, Christie, Burgum, Scott — I could offer play-by-play commentary on their performances, but it feels almost insultingly unnecessary: To give them notice might encourage them to remain in a race in which they simply do not belong. All four have their merits as politicians, but if they care about stopping Trump (as opposed to seeking cabinet positions), they should leave now and winnow the race to the three remaining non-Trump candidates — Haley, DeSantis, and Ramaswamy — who have distinguished themselves. But, again: Donald Trump hovers at or above 50 percent nationally in the primary polls. All of this is a sideshow, an undercard, until something happens to alter the larger Trump vs. Biden rematch dynamic.

No comments: