By Henry
Olsen
Wednesday,
September 27, 2023
Florida governor
Ron DeSantis’s attempt to defeat former president Donald Trump for the
Republican presidential nomination is clearly floundering. But so was Ronald
Reagan’s primary challenge to then-president Gerald Ford in 1976. DeSantis
should study Reagan’s comeback to engineer a similar rapid turnaround.
The
possibility of a Reagan presidency looked very dim in mid-March 1976.
Reagan had lost the Iowa caucus and five
straight primaries to the incumbent. Many of those battles were close, but a
loss is still a loss. The campaign was running out of money, and many leading
Republicans were calling on Reagan to drop out and
endorse Ford.
Reagan had to win the North Carolina primary or his campaign — and political
future — would be over.
Reagan
won the state, in large part by sharpening his rhetoric against the sitting
president. He drew a clear
distinction between
himself and Ford on a panoply of policy issues. Each had its role in his
comeback, but none was as important as Reagan’s opposition to the Panama Canal
Treaty.
The
United States had owned the land on which the Panama Canal would be built, and
some surrounding territory, since purchasing it in 1903. Panama’s authoritarian
government wanted it back, and Ford’s administration was engaged in
negotiations to give it back. Reagan believed this would threaten American
control over the vital waterway, especially if Panama came under the sway of
the Soviet Union.
Reagan increasingly highlighted his difference with Ford on
this issue in campaign-trail speeches. Republicans were growing fearful that
the United States was losing the Cold War, and they tended to blame the détente
strategy that both Ford’s and Richard Nixon’s administrations had pursued. The
Canal issue didn’t get Reagan the nomination, but it did keep him in the race
until he lost on the convention floor in August. That historically strong
performance made Reagan the front-runner in 1980, and the rest is history.
DeSantis
is in a similar position today as Reagan was then. No votes have been cast, but
his showing in national and state polls has steadily declined since he got into
the race. In today’s politics, that’s as deadly as losing six early races was
for Reagan in 1976. If DeSantis can’t stop the slide and get momentum back
soon, he will be hard pressed to make a rapid ascent later.
Fortunately,
Trump has given DeSantis an equivalent to the Panama Canal Treaty issue:
abortion. Trump’s clear disdain for pro-lifers and their ultimate objective —
to ban abortions across the board — is as out of step with today’s GOP as
Ford’s pro-Treaty stance was then. DeSantis cannot let this gift go to waste.
DeSantis
should do what Reagan did, and outline a set of differences with Trump on
policy — with a strong emphasis on abortion policy in particular. The message
should be simple: Trump says he’s fighting for you, but across the board he
either gives up the fight (he funded mail balloting, he kept Fauci and
criticized early lifting of lockdowns during the pandemic) or doesn’t share our
values. DeSantis cannot mince words: He has to force conservatives to choose
between him — a conservative fighter who wins — and Trump.
Abortion
should be front and center because church-going evangelicals, Catholics, and
Mormons are the party’s base. They represent the strongest and most loyal
voters in today’s Republican Party, and many have made opposition to abortion a
litmus test for decades. They need to be made to choose what they care about
more: saving unborn children or electing Donald Trump.
DeSantis
does not need to fall into a media trap and endorse a federal ban. He needs to
emphasize that he thinks abortion regulation is primarily a state issue and
that he does not favor anything stricter at the federal level than the 15-week
ban supported by many pro-life groups. He should instead emphasize the many
ways a genuinely pro-life president can act and talk to advance the culture of
life.
Trump
cannot meet him on those grounds. He has already blamed pro-lifers for the
party’s disappointing midterm-election results. He has also staked out a clear
principle that will govern his abortion policy if reelected: Abortion access
should be the subject of negotiations between abortion-rights activists and
pro-lifers. That principle is a chimera, something that simply cannot achieve
positive results given the vast philosophical gulf between the two sides.
Though
DeSantis will want to avoid this confrontation, he can’t. He needs a clear
rationale for his campaign. Vivek Ramaswamy and Nikki Haley have those, but
DeSantis’s efforts have thus far fallen flat. Haley is gathering the old
Reaganite wing to her banner while Vivek is becoming what DeSantis wanted to
be, the younger man MAGA World can back. Wait much longer, and those two will
squeeze DeSantis out of the race like toothpaste from a tube.
Ronald
Reagan met the party establishment head-on and ultimately won. Ron DeSantis
needs to show he can do the same thing, or else he’ll be yet another appealing
governor who falls flat on the national stage.
No comments:
Post a Comment