By Matt
Parprocki
Tuesday,
May 16, 2023
Americans
are moving out of big, blue cites.
This is
not news. For years, people have been migrating out of high-tax,
high-regulation cities and states in favor of low-tax, more business-friendly
locales. Political and
public-policy trends show
the flow out of blue areas ends up in purple or red regions.
Are we
going to give up and see our great cities perennially bleed residents? How can
we come together to save the places we call home from that fate?
As a
proud resident of Chicago — a city that just narrowly elected one of the
most far-left mayors in the country — I’m proposing we blur the party lines
and build around ideas that help cities thrive. There is a way forward for
America’s big cities as well as the country as a whole. But it will require us
to acknowledge some hard truths before we can get to work.
First,
it’s important to examine why people are moving. From July 2021 to July 2022,
the U.S. counties that lost the most
residents to outmigration were Cook County, which encompasses Chicago, plus Los Angeles
County and three major counties in New York City.
While
there’s no single reason for these population losses, there are a few factors
we can put in better context.
The
first is Covid-19, at least as a proximate cause. In 2020 and 2021, as the
country, especially left-leaning cities, enacted strict lockdowns and vaccine
mandates, people began moving
in record numbers to
suburbs or states with less stringent restrictions. But Americans had been
moving out of blue cities and states long before
Covid. The pandemic
didn’t create the exodus, it simply exacerbated it.
We can
also discount the idea that more people simply want to live in the
suburbs. More people
are moving to the suburbs today than before the pandemic, but while the numbers fluctuate year to
year, during the past decade, cities such as Austin, San Antonio, Phoenix, and
Jacksonville have consistently gained new residents. Plus, data show Americans
still like living in big cities.
So if
blue cities’ population losses aren’t purely because of Covid or people just
being sick of the big-city hustle, what is the main cause?
One of
the most consistent data threads for shrinking cities is how policies adopted
in those cities have made them increasingly more expensive, unsafe, and
unfriendly to business.
In a
poll of 800 registered
Chicago voters conducted by Echelon Insights for the Illinois Policy Institute, 34
percent of respondents said they wanted to leave the city and cited “taxes or
affordability” and crime as the top reasons why. We’ve seen these sentiments
reflected in elections. During the past two years, crime and the economy were
the two biggest issues in both Chicago’s and New York’s mayoral elections. An outbreak of youth violence in Chicago
in mid April likely would not have helped
calm fears. A struggling public-education system is not providing an incentive
to stay in the Windy City. Nearly 80 percent of Chicago eleventh-graders could
not read or perform math at grade level, according to state data from 2022.
Meanwhile, half of Chicago Public School System (CPS) students are chronically
absent. Nearly 90,000 students have left the CPS, shrinking
it by 20 percent since 2010 as families opt for private schools or flee the city
entirely.
With a
sixth major company, Guggenheim Partners, readying an expected move out of
Chicago this year, Mayor-elect Brandon Johnson, a former Chicago Teachers Union
leader, cannot spend his term ignoring the city’s perceived declining safety
and attractiveness to job creators. And while Johnson ultimately prevailed in
the 2023 mayoral race, he must remember that his win was not a landslide —
nearly 48 percent of city voters did not favor his radical approach.
How
We Can Come Back Together
Just as
cities such as New York, Los Angeles, and my hometown of Chicago grew to be
magnets for families, entrepreneurs, and Americans from all walks of life in
the 20th century, they can do so again in the 21st century. The key will be to
embrace a more moderate approach to public policy. That means refusing to give
in to the extreme policies and ideologies that have gotten many major cities to
this point.
New
York’s new mayor, Eric Adams, while far from perfect, serves as an example of
this concept.
Adams
was elected as a moderate Democrat against a field of
candidates who
were pitching extreme ideas such as defunding the police, canceling rent,
hiking taxes to pay for expensive entitlement programs, and much more. Adams
won with a campaign promising to address crime and
public safety,
helping small
businesses succeed, and embracing school-choice
programs.
While
Adams is still early in his administration, his approach to governance seems to
be reducing
violent crime in
New York and has ushered in a new era of policy ideas and approaches in the Big
Apple.
But
reasonable and moderate elected leaders can only do so much. It takes residents
willing to fight for change in their hometowns to bring it about. While no one
can be faulted for moving out of a city for financial reasons or out of fear
for their family’s safety, our great American cities will only improve if
Americans are willing to stay and fight for their futures.
I truly
believe this, which is why — even though I disagree with many of the policies my
new mayor has promised to push for — my family is buying a home in Chicago. We’re dedicating
ourselves to making our city better.
Americans
are moving, and they have been for years now. But if our big-city leaders can
listen to their residents’ needs and steer for the center rather than the
fringes, I have faith that Americans will soon be moving back to our cities
regardless of political hue.
No comments:
Post a Comment