By Kevin D. Williamson
Tuesday, August 02, 2022
Senator Joe Manchin, in his wisdom,
has decided to join the Biden administration and his fellow Democrats
in Congress to — wait! what? — raise the
gasoline tax.
In an underhanded way, of course.
You will recall that in the early summer,
as gasoline prices were skyrocketing, President Joe Biden, the fearful little
man in the White House, called for a three-month suspension of the federal
sales tax on gasoline. A little somethin’-somethin’ to help out all them
pickup-driving Joe Sixpack types out there in the great expansive
hydrocarbon-powered boonies — you know, voters. It was a dumb idea on its own,
and it was a dumb idea because it was offered as a substitute for the smart
idea, i.e., getting Uncle Stupid’s big fat foot off the neck of the U.S. energy
industry so that prosperity may emerge organically. It was a
quintessentially political proposal, one that would create the
impression of doing something and offer a synthetic sense of urgency — the sort
of action that is to real policy as stevia is to sugar.
But there was a kind of reflexive economic
truth to it: Policies that make gasoline more expensive make gasoline more
expensive. And while Democrats do intend to make hydrocarbon energy not only
more expensive but prohibitively expensive at some point in time, at that
moment the rising price of fuel was politically inconvenient. Climate action
can’t wait — except when it can.
But now, under the Joe Manchin–Chuck
Schumer climate-folly bill — in which the Democrats propose to decrease
inflation by flooding the economy with hundreds of billions of dollars in fresh
federal spending, akin to treating diabetes with intravenous injections of
Mountain Dew — the gasoline tax is going to go up by billions of dollars a
year. The tax Manchin et al. mean to raise is not the one you see imposed at
the pump, but the so-called Superfund tax, which lapsed in the 1990s but will
be, if Manchin and Schumer have their way, coming back with a vengeance.
The tax is meant to fund federal
environmental-mitigation costs at Superfund sites, and it takes the form of an
excise on domestic and imported crude oil, as well as on imported petroleum
fuels. The original Superfund tax also included a tax on certain chemicals and
related “taxable substances,” and that part of the tax already had been revived
by the infrastructure bill signed into law in November 2021. The infrastructure
bill had the effect of doubling the prior tax rate on the
targeted chemicals, as Deloitte
figures it.
And there is current progressive
environmental policy in miniature: a cheap symbolic I’m-on-your-side gesture to
try to buy off the rubes with one hand while sticking the other hand into their
deliciously pillageable pockets. The economics of “tax incidence” — meaning the
question of where the burden of a tax falls not de jure but de facto — can get
pretty complicated, but it is a safe bet that whether the tax is tacked on at
the end of the supply chain or upstream, it will put upward pressure on
consumer energy prices.
In much the same way that lottery proceeds
are notionally intended to benefit politically popular projects such as schools
or veterans’ care but end up being dumped into the same revenue hole as
everything else, the Superfund tax is, like all taxes, fungible. The marketing
material may say that it is being used to clean up environmental-disaster
zones, but, as with every other dollar paid in federal taxes, some 80 percent
or so of that revenue will go to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and other
health-care subsidies, national defense, and interest on the debt, which is
where almost all federal spending goes.
I am sympathetic to Pigouvian taxes of an
environmental character and think there is a pretty good case for a carbon tax
to account for the externalities of hydrocarbon consumption. But this is not
that — it is nothing nearly so honest. This is simply playing both sides of
gas-price politics at the same time, attaching some notional revenue to the
climate package to fortify the pretense that it is going to be deficit-neutral
while simultaneously burdening the energy industry and setting
it up as the scapegoat in case of continued energy-price inflation. You know:
“We are trying to make them pay their fair share, and they are unfairly
punishing consumers in the service of their bottomless blah blah greed blah
blah.”
You can’t blame 100 percent of the price
of gasoline on Joe Biden or Joe Manchin. But if the bill becomes law more or
less as written, you’ll be able to blame them for an additional
16 cents a gallon or so.
Another Call for the Max Tax
Wikipedia reports that after the
nonrenewal of the Superfund excise, “the burden of the cost was shifted to
taxpayers” — as though petroleum and chemical companies were not, you
know, massive taxpayers.
Chevron reported in March 2022 that in the
past decade it has paid $64 billion in income taxes and another $48 billion in
non-income taxes to the several dozen jurisdictions around the world that tax
it. That’s not just a ton of money — that’s about a thousand tons of money in
stacked-up $100 bills. The notion that these companies are not taxpayers is
exceptionally asinine.
I will take this opportunity to renew my
call for a maximum tax.
Our lefty friends sometimes push for a
high minimum tax, or even for a “maximum income,” an income at which the
marginal tax rate would be 100 percent. This is the thinking of Barack Obama,
who once said: “At a certain point, you’ve made enough money.” (That’s the kind
of thing you say before your $65 million Netflix payday.) I take a different
view: that at a certain point, you’ve paid enough tax. People think I’m joking
about this, but I’m only half-joking at most: I don’t care how much money you
make, once you’ve paid $1 million in income tax, I think that’s enough — forever.
I don’t know what Senator Warren thinks is your “fair share,” but if you have
handed over $1 million to the Treasury, you have done your part. For
businesses, maybe cap total taxes at $1 billion.
We Americans are all good egalitarians,
right? I don’t want to hear about how Taxpayer X, who has put billions of
dollars into the national budget, hasn’t paid his “fair share” — coming from
people who haven’t paid enough taxes to pay for a Honda Civic.
The Max Tax — an idea whose time has come!
And Furthermore . . .On the eve of the Normandy invasion, the commander of Allied forces,
General Dwight Eisenhower, wrote a short speech. It was the speech he didn’t
want to give — the statement he would make in case Operation Overlord was a
failure.
He made some last-minute edits, in one
sentence striking the words “this particular operation” and inserting instead
“my decision to attack.” My decision. Contemporary American
life has a whole genre of speech dedicated to avoiding statements of personal
accountability — “mistakes were made” — but General Eisenhower did not write
that way. He wasn’t a brilliant writer like Grant or Jefferson, but he was a
clear and direct one, ending his statement: “The troops, the air and the Navy
did all that bravery and devotion to duty could do. If any blame or fault
attaches to the attempt it is mine alone.”
Mine alone.
That wasn’t, strictly speaking, true:
There were dozens and dozens of variables that were beyond his control, and any
number of reasons the invasion might have failed through no fault of the
supreme commander. But it was General Eisenhower giving the orders while others
executed them — accountability, in his understanding, began at the top.
Can you imagine the speech Supreme Allied
Commander Donald J. Trump would have given if he had been the commander at
Normandy and the invasion had failed?
Not that Trump would ever find himself in
that position. When his country came calling, he showed himself to be a coward
and dodged the draft by means of a made-up case of bone spurs that somehow
magically cleared up — without treatment — as soon as the danger of service was
safely passed. Trump does have the most-interesting doctors.
Still, you can imagine it:
“Our invasion was perfect! People are
saying that it was the single greatest military campaign ever conceived, and I
am awarding myself the Distinguished Service Cross. People are saying that I
should win the Medal of Honor, but Democrats in Congress won’t give it to me —
very unfair. SAD! Haters are saying our invasion failed, that we lost — fake news! We won. We won, and it wasn’t
even close. I’m thinking about suing them for defamation. I have the world’s
greatest military experts saying that our invasion was perfect, that nobody
could have done what I did losing only 155,000 troops, which was a terrible
thing to watch on Fox News. All the best military analysts say we won: Bill
O’Reilly, Ted Nugent, Jon Voight, who was very strong in Pearl Harbor — I
mean Pearl Harbor the movie, playing FDR, who has been very
unfair to me . . . .”
Trump is still insisting that he won in
2020, because he is too weak and too much of a coward to face the facts: that
he wasn’t very good at the job, in the judgment of most of the American people,
who set him aside in favor of a dusty can of tuna with hair plugs. He is expected
to announce another campaign for the presidency any day now. His plan, if he
wins, is personal
government. If he loses? We can assume that it will
be more of the same: lying and whimpering.
That, and making eyes at men of the sort
he would like to be: Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, Kim Jong-un, Mohammed bin
Salman.
I’m not supposed to call the Trump boys
Uday and Qusay anymore, and, besides, Saddam Hussein is long gone — but Eric
Trump has searched all of Arabia and come up with an entirely different
murdering anti-American son of a bitch to suck up to, making an appearance at
Saudi potentate Mohammed bin Salman’s PR-project
golf tournament carrying a golf bag emblazoned with
an American flag and the legend: “Trump 2024.” Donald Trump has praised the
Saudi initiative, too. Jamal Khashoggi was not a U.S. citizen, but he was a
resident of the United States who worked for an American newspaper, and
Mohammed bin Salman had him cut up like a fryer chicken. He did that on Trump’s
watch, knowing that Trump, who has a weak man’s enrapturement with strongmen,
would let it slide. He wasn’t wrong. You’ll recall that super-spy Donald
Trump insisted that
the CIA had it all wrong.
But voters in that depraved and soul-sick
organization called the Republican Party still prefer Trump
to such potential competitors as Ron DeSantis, a conservative governor who is, for the most part, pretty good at his
job.
I don’t think very much of Harry S. Truman
(or, if you insist, Harry S Truman), but I do think highly of “the buck stops
here.”
The magnitude
and difficulty of the trust to which the voice of my Country called me, being
sufficient to awaken in the wisest and most experienced of her citizens, a
distrustful scrutiny into his qualifications, could not but overwhelm with
dispondence, one, who, inheriting inferior endowments from nature and
unpractised in the duties of civil administration, ought to be peculiarly
conscious of his own deficiencies.
That was George Washington’s
self-assessment upon taking office as president.
We have
been the recipients of the choicest bounties of Heaven. We have been preserved,
these many years, in peace and prosperity. We have grown in numbers, wealth and
power, as no other nation has ever grown. But we have forgotten God. We have
forgotten the gracious hand which preserved us in peace, and multiplied and
enriched and strengthened us; and we have vainly imagined, in the deceitfulness
of our hearts, that all these blessings were produced by some superior wisdom
and virtue of our own. Intoxicated with unbroken success, we have become too
self-sufficient to feel the necessity of redeeming and preserving grace, too
proud to pray to the God that made us! It behooves us then, to humble ourselves
before the offended Power, to confess our national sins, and to pray for
clemency and forgiveness.
That was Abraham Lincoln’s plan to make
America great again.
And Donald Trump’s legacy?
“They cheated like hell.”
“Very unfair.”
And not: “The troops, the air and the Navy
did all that bravery and devotion to duty could do. If any blame or fault
attaches to the attempt it is mine alone.”
No comments:
Post a Comment